Porter Wright Morris & Arthur LLP
Size of Organization: 250
Year Established: 1846
Web Site: http://www.porterwright.comVisibility Ranking  #168 out of 193,855 law firms |
Porter Wright Morris & Arthur LLP is a nationally known business law firm delivering creative solutions for large, mid-size and entrepreneurial businesses. The Firm, which traces its origins to 1846, has more than 250 lawyers practicing in Cincinnati, Cleveland, Columbus, and Dayton, Ohio; Washington, D.C.; and Naples, Florida. The Firm provides legal services to a worldwide base of clients in the areas of business and finance, commercial litigation, financial institutions law and regulation, commercial and personal lending, bankruptcy, government affairs, environmental law, personal injury and tort litigation, insurance, health care, employee benefits, labor and employment, real estate, federal and state tax, trusts and estates, probate proceedings and litigation, federal procurement and contracting, utility regulation, international and intellectual property, securities and technologies.
Martindale-Hubbell has augmented a firm's provided information with third-party sourced data to present a more comprehensive overview of the firm's expertise:
U.S. Federal Litigation Activity
Highest number of cases by Porter Wright Morris & Arthur LLP:
Contracts (53 cases in past two years)
Transactional Activity
Total number of Mergers & Aquisitions by Porter Wright Morris & Arthur LLP:
6 (in past two years)
U.S. Patent Activity
Total number of U.S. granted patents by Porter Wright Morris & Arthur LLP:
20 (in past two years)
Peer Review Ratings
Total number of Peer Review Rated lawyers of Porter Wright Morris & Arthur LLP:
145
What is This?
Articles by Porter Wright Morris & Arthur LLP on Martindale.com
2008 CMS Physician Fee Schedule Final RuleStacey Borowicz, Richard G. Terapak, Lloyd G. DePew, Theodore G. Fisher, Charles Y. Kidwell, Raphael J. Omerza, Daniel W. Scharff, Mark K. Velasco, Timothy J. Cahill, John Patrick Carney, October 7, 2008
Physician ventures involving diagnostic tests require compliance with federal and state anti-self referral laws (e.g. Stark Law), federal and state anti-kickback statutes, and Medicare billing regulations. Understanding the distinction and overlap between all of these rules and laws became more...
Treasury Provides Relief for Deferred Compensation PlansDavid A. Tumen, Richard J. Helmreich, Ann M. Caresani, Greg M. Daugherty, Susan Nolan Lubow, Charles Y. Kidwell, October 6, 2008
The IRS and Treasury Department recently issued two Notices (Notice 2007-86 and Notice 2007-89) that (1) extended key deadlines for employers to bring nonqualified deferred compensation ("NQDC") plans into compliance with Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code and (2) provided guidance...
Legislation Introduced to Nullify Effects of Supreme Court DecisionDonald M. Barnes, Alan R. Malasky, Salvatore A. Romano, October 4, 2008
Legislation recently introduced by Senators Kohl, Biden and Clinton would nullify the effects of the Supreme Court's decision last term in Leegin Creative Leather Products v. PSKS, Inc. and restore automatic illegality under the Sherman Act of agreements requiring distributors or retailers to...