Article(s) published by this organization: 10
Sort by:
 | United States Supreme Court Alters Standards for Age Discrimination Cases Gross v. FBL Financial Services, Inc., June 18, 2009 Damian Shammas; Porzio, Bromberg & Newman P.C.; July 9, 2009, previously published on June 29, 2009 The United States Supreme Court changed the manner in which age discrimination cases are to be proven, reaffirming that the burden of persuasion remains with the plaintiff at all times and confirming that a plaintiff must demonstrate that age was the "but-for" reason for the adverse... |
| United States Supreme Court Alters Standards for Age Discrimination Cases Damian Shammas; Porzio, Bromberg & Newman P.C.; July 8, 2009, previously published on June 29, 2009 The United States Supreme Court changed the manner in which age discrimination cases are to be proven, reaffirming that the burden of persuasion remains with the plaintiff at all times and confirming that a plaintiff must demonstrate that age was the "but-for" reason for the adverse... |
| State Treasurer Defines "State Redevelopment Entities" Pursuant to Executive Order 118 Brian P. Sharkey, Peter J. Wolfson; Porzio, Bromberg & Newman P.C.; June 26, 2009, previously published on June 1, 2009 Pay to play is the concept that elected officials reward their campaign contributors with no-bid government contracts. A series of State laws enacted over the past several years impose restrictions on the award of government contracts to businesses that make certain political contributions. |
| Filing Trademarks in the European Community Prior to May 1, 2009 will Save Fees Porzio, Bromberg & Newman P.C.; April 30, 2009, previously published on April 2009 For over a decade United States trademark owners seeking protection for trademarks in Europe have had the option of filing a single application covering the twenty-seven countries that comprise the European Community (Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Cyprus, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia,... |
| Construction Lienors: Does Your Project Qualify as a "Residential Construction Contract"? Sarah M. Canberg, Douglas R. Henshaw, Peter J. Wolfson; Porzio, Bromberg & Newman P.C.; April 30, 2009, previously published on April 2009 In these difficult economic times, collecting on accounts for certain qualified work performed at or materials delivered to construction projects often require aggressive tactics. |
| Construction Lienors: Does Your Project Qualify as a "Residential Construction Contract"? Sarah M. Canberg, Douglas R. Henshaw, Peter J. Wolfson; Porzio, Bromberg & Newman P.C.; April 16, 2009, previously published on April 2009 In these difficult economic times, collecting on accounts for certain qualified work performed at or materials delivered to construction projects often require aggressive tactics. |
| New Pennsylvania Law Places Significant Requirements on Your Business and Contracts Eric L. Probst; Porzio, Bromberg & Newman P.C.; April 1, 2009, previously published on March 20, 2009 On October 7, 2009, the Pennsylvania Legislature responded to the mounting consumer complaints about and lawsuits against home improvement contractors by passing the Pennsylvania Home Improvement Consumer Protection Act (the "Act"). |
| Over-the-Counter and Prescription Drug Manufacturers are Granted a One Year Reprieve from the Burdensome Requirements of the Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act Frank Fazio, Anne E. Wagstaff; Porzio, Bromberg & Newman P.C.; March 26, 2009, previously published on March 9, 2009 On August 12, 2008, Congress passed the Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act ("CPSIA"), which amended the Consumer Product Safety Act ("CPSA"). |
| United States Supreme Court Clears Way for Parents to Sue School Officials in Federal Court for Student on Student Gender Discrimination Thomas O. Johnston, Raquel Lesnever; Porzio, Bromberg & Newman P.C.; March 26, 2009, previously published on March 2009 On January 21, 2009, the United States Supreme Court decided Fitzgerald v. Barnstable School Committee, holding that parents and emancipated students can bring a student-on-student gender discrimination claim in Federal Court against public school officials under Title IX of the Education Amendment... |
| The New Jersey Supreme Court Upholds the Constitutionality of the State's Pay-To-Play Law and Requires Strict Adherence to Its Provisions Christopher P. DePhillips, Brian P. Sharkey; Porzio, Bromberg & Newman P.C.; February 6, 2009, previously published on January 20, 2009 New Jersey has enacted a series of laws in the past several years designed to address pay-to-play abuses. |
