Premier Destination for Sophisticated Buyers of Legal Services
Home > Law Firm Profile > Overview

Porzio, Bromberg & Newman P.C.

 – Firm Profile
 




Porzio, Bromberg & Newman P.C. Law Firm Logo

Porzio, Bromberg & Newman P.C. 
Size of Organization: 86
Year Established: 1962
Web Site: http://www.pbnlaw.com

Telephone: 973-538-4006
Facsimile: 973-538-5146

Profile Visibility
#244 in weekly profile views out of 203,342 total law firms Overall

Icon for Featured Peer Review Rated LawyerIcon for Featured Peer Review Rated Lawyer at this firm


Environmental LawGeneral Practice
 
               Learn More

 

Firm lawyers represent clients in more than 30 jurisdictions in the United States and abroad, in industries as diverse as pharmaceutical and biotech, real estate, financial services, transportation, natural resources, entertainment, education, chemical and manufacturing.


Martindale-Hubbell has augmented a firm's provided information with third-party sourced data to present a more comprehensive overview of the firm's expertise:
U.S. Federal Litigation Activity
Source: U.S. Federal Civil District Court Databases. Powered by LexisNexis atVantage

Highest number of cases by Porzio, Bromberg & Newman P.C.:
Toxic Torts (197 cases in past two years)
Peer Review Ratings

Total number of Peer Review Rated lawyers of Porzio, Bromberg & Newman P.C.: 35


Documents by Porzio, Bromberg & Newman P.C. on Martindale.com


United States Supreme Court Alters Standards for Age Discrimination Cases Gross v. FBL Financial Services, Inc., June 18, 2009
Damian Shammas, July 9, 2009
The United States Supreme Court changed the manner in which age discrimination cases are to be proven, reaffirming that the burden of persuasion remains with the plaintiff at all times and confirming that a plaintiff must demonstrate that age was the "but-for" reason for the adverse...

United States Supreme Court Alters Standards for Age Discrimination Cases
Damian Shammas, July 8, 2009
The United States Supreme Court changed the manner in which age discrimination cases are to be proven, reaffirming that the burden of persuasion remains with the plaintiff at all times and confirming that a plaintiff must demonstrate that age was the "but-for" reason for the adverse...

State Treasurer Defines "State Redevelopment Entities" Pursuant to Executive Order 118
Brian P. Sharkey, Peter J. Wolfson, June 26, 2009
Pay to play is the concept that elected officials reward their campaign contributors with no-bid government contracts. A series of State laws enacted over the past several years impose restrictions on the award of government contracts to businesses that make certain political contributions.




 

Complete a Client Review


Have you recently worked with this firm? Share your experience as a Client of this firm and complete a Client Review to help others make an informed choice when hiring legal counsel.
 
 

Compare this Firm

Compare this firm to other firms in your Watch List.
 

Add this Firm to Your Watch List

As a registered user of martindale.com you can add lawyers and firms to your Watch List. You can securely add comments, compare firms in your Watch List, and access these firms with one click from your martindale.com homepage.