|
Document(s) published by this organization: 46
Show: results per page Sort by:  | Smartmatic Int’l Corp. v. Dominion Voting Sys. Int’l Corp., C.A. No. 7844-VCP (Del. Ch. May 1, 2013) (Parsons, V.C.)
Potter Anderson Corroon LLP;
Legal Alert/Article May 9, 2013, previously published on May 1, 2013 In this memorandum opinion, the Court of Chancery denied the parties’ cross-motions for partial summary judgment in a breach of contract case, reasoning that the contract language “in the United States” was ambiguous as to whether it included Puerto Rico.
| | Blaustein, et al. v. Lord Baltimore Capital Corp., et al., C.A. No. 6685-VCN, (Del. Ch. Apr. 30, 2013) (Noble, V.C.)
Potter Anderson Corroon LLP;
Legal Alert/Article May 9, 2013, previously published on April 30, 2013 In this memorandum opinion, the Court of Chancery granted defendants’ summary judgment motion dismissing claims based on the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing under a shareholders’ agreement and further denied plaintiffs’ motion for leave to supplement the complaint...
| | In re Wayport, Inc. Litig., Consol. C.A. No. 4167-VCL (Del. Ch. May 1, 2013) (Laster, V.C.)
Potter Anderson Corroon LLP;
Legal Alert/Article May 9, 2013, previously published on May 1, 2013 In this opinion, the Court of Chancery, applying the “special facts doctrine,” rejected the plaintiffs’ claims for breach of the fiduciary duty of loyalty against the defendants arising out of sales of the plaintiffs’ stock in Wayport, Inc. (“Wayport”), finding...
| | Eluv Holdings (BVI) Ltd., et al. v. Dotomi, LLC, C.A. No. 6894-VCP (Del. Ch. Mar. 26, 2013) (Parsons, V.C.)
Potter Anderson Corroon LLP;
Legal Alert/Article April 6, 2013, previously published on March 26, 2013 The Court of Chancery’s memorandum opinion in Eluv Holdings (BVI) Ltd. v. Dotomi, LLC awarded a defendant company summary judgment on plaintiffs’ claim for declaratory judgment regarding their purported ownership of defendant’s stock. According to the Court, plaintiffs’...
| | In re PAETEC Holding Corp. S'holders Litig., C.A. No. 6761-VCG (Del. Ch. Mar. 19, 2013) (Glasscock, V.C.)
Potter Anderson Corroon LLP;
Legal Alert/Article April 3, 2013, previously published on March 19, 2013 In this letter opinion, the Court of Chancery awarded attorneys’ fees and costs to plaintiffs’ counsel of $500,000 after analyzing plaintiffs’ unopposed fee request under the relevant Sugarland factors, and determining that certain supplemental disclosures secured by plaintiffs...
| | Zutrau v. Jansing, C.A. No. 7457-VCP (Del. Ch. Mar. 18, 2013) (Parsons, V.C.)
Potter Anderson Corroon LLP;
Legal Alert/Article March 28, 2013, previously published on March 18, 2013 In this memorandum opinion, the Court of Chancery denied a motion to dismiss derivative and direct claims filed by a shareholder of ICE Systems, Inc. (“ICE” or the “Company”) against the Company’s president, sole director and majority shareholder. In so doing, the...
| | In re Diamond Foods, Inc. Derivative Litig., C.A. No. 7657-CS (Del. Ch. Feb. 28, 2013)
Potter Anderson Corroon LLP;
Legal Alert/Article March 12, 2013, previously published on February 28, 2013 In this memorandum opinion, the Court of Chancery granted defendants’ motion to dismiss the plaintiffs’ breach of fiduciary duty claims.
| | Gallagher v. Long, C.A. No. 8181-CS (Del. Ch. Feb. 28, 2013) (Strine, C.)
Potter Anderson Corroon LLP;
Legal Alert/Article March 12, 2013, previously published on February 28, 2013 In this letter opinion, the Delaware Court of Chancery granted a motion to dismiss a breach of fiduciary duty claim under the doctrine of laches and rejected motions for oral argument and to recuse Chancellor Leo Strine.
| | Jepsco, Ltd. v. B.F. Rich Co., Inc., C.A. No. 7343-VCP (Del. Ch. Feb. 14, 2013) (Parsons, V.C.)
Potter Anderson Corroon LLP;
Legal Alert/Article February 27, 2013, previously published on February 14, 2013 The Delaware Court of Chancery held that claims for breach of statutory and fiduciary duties against a custodian appointed under Section 226 of the Delaware General Corporation Law (“DGCL”) failed as a matter of law because the custodian was entitled to judicial immunity as to certain...
| | In re Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold Inc. Derivative Litig., C.A. No. 8145-VCN (Del. Ch. Feb. 14, 2013) (Noble, V.C.)
Potter Anderson Corroon LLP;
Legal Alert/Article February 27, 2013, previously published on February 14, 2013 In this letter opinion, the Court of Chancery granted a motion to intervene by certain shareholders (the “Proposed Intervenors”) of Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold Inc. (“Freeport”) and approved the Proposed Intervenors’ application to certify an interlocutory...
|
|