Home > Lawyer Profile
Home > Lawyer Profile
No photo Available

Randall L. Harbour

PO Box 130077
Ann Arbor, Michigan 48113-0077
Peer Rating
4.7 of 5.0
Client Rating
N/R
AV Rated
Experience & Credentials
Practice Areas
Financial Institution Law; Corporate Finance; Governance & Securities; Mergers & Acquisitions; Strategic Transactions & Alliances; Financial Institution Regulation & Compliance; Real Estate Development; Real Estate Law; Business Law; Business & Corporate; Finance; Real Estate & Bankruptcy Law; Business Contracts; Arbitration & Mediation
University
University of Michigan, B.A., 1972
Law School
University of Michigan Law School, J.D., 1975
Admitted
1976, Michigan; 2000, Ohio; U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan; U.S. Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals; U.S. District Court of Northern California; U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals; U.S. Tax Court
ISLN
906704897
Peer Reviews (16)
AV Rated
4.7/5.0
Peer Rating
 
High Ethical Standard
Corporate Commercial Law, Banking Law, Business Law, Corporate Organization, Banking Regulation, Taxation and Intellectual Property
Areas of Practice
Legal Knowledge
4.7/5
Analytical Capabilities
4.8/5
Judgment
4.7/5
Communication Ability
4.8/5
Legal Experience
4.8/5
Peer Reviews (16)
5.0/5.0 Posted by a Of Counsel on 07/17/14
Very competent and professional. He is highly regarded in the legal community and with clients.
Legal Knowledge
5/5
Analytical Capabilities
5/5
Judgment
5/5
Communication Ability
5/5
Legal Experience
5/5
5.0/5.0 Posted by a Partner on 07/09/14
A leader in the banking law field and a great teaching partner.
Legal Knowledge
5/5
Analytical Capabilities
5/5
Judgment
5/5
Communication Ability
5/5
Legal Experience
5/5
5.0/5.0 Posted by a Member on 07/28/14
Legal Knowledge
5/5
Analytical Capabilities
5/5
Judgment
5/5
Communication Ability
5/5
Legal Experience
5/5
5.0/5.0 Posted by a Partner on 07/27/14
Legal Knowledge
5/5
Analytical Capabilities
5/5
Judgment
5/5
Communication Ability
5/5
Legal Experience
5/5
5.0/5.0 Posted by a Sole Practitioner on 07/26/14
Legal Knowledge
5/5
Analytical Capabilities
5/5
Judgment
5/5
Communication Ability
5/5
Legal Experience
5/5
5.0/5.0 Posted by a Partner on 07/25/14
Legal Knowledge
5/5
Analytical Capabilities
5/5
Judgment
5/5
Communication Ability
5/5
Legal Experience
5/5
5.0/5.0 Posted by a Partner on 07/17/14
Legal Knowledge
5/5
Analytical Capabilities
5/5
Judgment
5/5
Communication Ability
5/5
Legal Experience
5/5
5.0/5.0 Posted by a Partner on 07/09/14
Legal Knowledge
5/5
Analytical Capabilities
5/5
Judgment
5/5
Communication Ability
5/5
Legal Experience
5/5
5.0/5.0 Posted by a Principal on 07/09/14
Legal Knowledge
5/5
Analytical Capabilities
5/5
Judgment
5/5
Communication Ability
5/5
Legal Experience
5/5
5.0/5.0 Posted by a Partner on 07/09/14
Legal Knowledge
5/5
Analytical Capabilities
5/5
Judgment
5/5
Communication Ability
5/5
Legal Experience
5/5
5.0/5.0 Posted by a Judge on 07/09/14
Legal Knowledge
5/5
Analytical Capabilities
5/5
Judgment
5/5
Communication Ability
5/5
Legal Experience
5/5
5.0/5.0 Posted by a Sole Practitioner on 07/09/14
Legal Knowledge
5/5
Analytical Capabilities
5/5
Judgment
5/5
Communication Ability
5/5
Legal Experience
5/5
4.0/5.0 Posted by a Member on 07/18/14
Legal Knowledge
4/5
Analytical Capabilities
4/5
Judgment
4/5
Communication Ability
4/5
Legal Experience
4/5
4.0/5.0 Posted by a Partner on 07/09/14
Legal Knowledge
4/5
Analytical Capabilities
4/5
Judgment
4/5
Communication Ability
4/5
Legal Experience
4/5
4.0/5.0 Posted by a Member on 07/09/14
Legal Knowledge
4/5
Analytical Capabilities
4/5
Judgment
4/5
Communication Ability
4/5
Legal Experience
4/5
3.6/5.0 Posted by a Partner on 07/17/14
Legal Knowledge
3/5
Analytical Capabilities
4/5
Judgment
3/5
Communication Ability
4/5
Legal Experience
4/5
*Individual reviews provided before 2009 are not displayed
Disclaimer: No representation is made that the quality of legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers. The testimonial or endorsement does not constitute a guarantee, warranty, or prediction regarding the outcome of your legal matter. Any result that the endorsed lawyer or law firm may achieve on behalf of one client in one matter does not necessarily indicate that similar results can be obtained for other clients. Past success cannot be an assurance of future success because each case must be decided on its own merits. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Martindale-Hubbell® does not undertake to develop a Client Review Rating or Peer Review Rating for all firms and/or lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed as unfavorable. Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for and will not be liable for the content and accuracy of the individual Reviews and the aggregated Reviews.