Home > Lawyer Profile
Home > Lawyer Profile
No photo Available

Richard David Carella

Principal
Updike, Kelly & Spellacy, P.C.
300 Plaza Middlesex, 203 Main Street
Middletown, Connecticut 06457
Peer Rating
4.6 of 5.0
Client Rating
N/R
AV Rated
Experience & Credentials
Practice Areas
Zoning, Planning and Land Use; Farm and Ranch Law; Real Estate; Commercial Law; Business Law; Corporate Law; Collections; Probate; Estate Planning; Wills; Trusts; Appellate Practice; Civil Practice
University
Fairfield University, Fairfield, Connecticut, B.S., 1988
Law School
Quinnipiac University School of Law, Hamden, Connecticut, J.D., 1991
Admitted
1992, Connecticut and U.S. District Court, District of Connecticut; 2009, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
ISLN
915670381
Peer Reviews (16)
AV Rated
4.6/5.0
Peer Rating
 
High Ethical Standard
Family Law, General Practice, Litigation, Real Estate, Commercial Finance, Commercial Real Estate, Real Estate Acquisitions, Commercial Contracts and Zoning Law
Areas of Practice
Legal Knowledge
4.7/5
Analytical Capabilities
4.6/5
Judgment
4.4/5
Communication Ability
4.6/5
Legal Experience
4.6/5
Peer Reviews (16)
5.0/5.0 Posted by a Partner on 04/05/12
We have worked in matters on and after past 20 years and Atty. Carella is both professional and knowledgable.
Legal Knowledge
5/5
Analytical Capabilities
5/5
Judgment
5/5
Communication Ability
5/5
Legal Experience
5/5
5.0/5.0 Posted by a Partner on 03/31/12
Legal Knowledge
5/5
Analytical Capabilities
5/5
Judgment
5/5
Communication Ability
5/5
Legal Experience
5/5
5.0/5.0 Posted by a Partner on 03/30/12
Legal Knowledge
5/5
Analytical Capabilities
5/5
Judgment
5/5
Communication Ability
5/5
Legal Experience
5/5
5.0/5.0 Posted by a Sole Practitioner on 03/28/12
Legal Knowledge
5/5
Analytical Capabilities
5/5
Judgment
5/5
Communication Ability
5/5
Legal Experience
5/5
5.0/5.0 Posted by a Staff Lawyer on 03/19/12
As a transactional attorney, Rich Carella is a very creative problem-solver
Legal Knowledge
5/5
Analytical Capabilities
5/5
Judgment
5/5
Communication Ability
5/5
Legal Experience
5/5
5.0/5.0 Posted by a Associate on 03/12/12
Legal Knowledge
5/5
Analytical Capabilities
5/5
Judgment
5/5
Communication Ability
5/5
Legal Experience
5/5
4.8/5.0 Posted by a Partner on 04/06/12
Legal Knowledge
5/5
Analytical Capabilities
5/5
Judgment
5/5
Communication Ability
5/5
Legal Experience
4/5
4.8/5.0 Posted by a Partner on 03/31/12
Legal Knowledge
5/5
Analytical Capabilities
5/5
Judgment
4/5
Communication Ability
5/5
Legal Experience
5/5
4.6/5.0 Posted by a Managing Partner on 03/29/12
Legal Knowledge
5/5
Analytical Capabilities
5/5
Judgment
4/5
Communication Ability
5/5
Legal Experience
4/5
4.6/5.0 Posted by a Principal on 03/28/12
Legal Knowledge
5/5
Analytical Capabilities
5/5
Judgment
4/5
Communication Ability
5/5
Legal Experience
4/5
4.6/5.0 Posted by a Principal on 03/11/12
Legal Knowledge
5/5
Analytical Capabilities
4/5
Judgment
5/5
Communication Ability
4/5
Legal Experience
5/5
4.6/5.0 Posted by a Principal on 03/11/12
Legal Knowledge
4/5
Analytical Capabilities
5/5
Judgment
5/5
Communication Ability
4/5
Legal Experience
5/5
4.4/5.0 Posted by a Principal on 03/11/12
Legal Knowledge
5/5
Analytical Capabilities
4/5
Judgment
4/5
Communication Ability
4/5
Legal Experience
5/5
4.0/5.0 Posted by a Principal on 03/20/12
Legal Knowledge
4/5
Analytical Capabilities
4/5
Judgment
4/5
Communication Ability
4/5
Legal Experience
4/5
3.6/5.0 Posted by a Sole Practitioner on 03/13/12
Attorney Carrella is an honest and fair person who is a benefit to the legal profession. As an opposing counsel, he is a pleasure to work with which truly benefits our respective clients as well as the perception of attorneys to the public.
Legal Knowledge
4/5
Analytical Capabilities
3/5
Judgment
3/5
Communication Ability
4/5
Legal Experience
4/5
3.0/5.0 Posted by a Associate on 05/03/10
Legal Knowledge
3/5
Analytical Capabilities
3/5
Judgment
3/5
Communication Ability
3/5
Legal Experience
3/5
*Individual reviews provided before 2009 are not displayed
Disclaimer: No representation is made that the quality of legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers. The testimonial or endorsement does not constitute a guarantee, warranty, or prediction regarding the outcome of your legal matter. Any result that the endorsed lawyer or law firm may achieve on behalf of one client in one matter does not necessarily indicate that similar results can be obtained for other clients. Past success cannot be an assurance of future success because each case must be decided on its own merits. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Martindale-Hubbell® does not undertake to develop a Client Review Rating or Peer Review Rating for all firms and/or lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed as unfavorable. Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for and will not be liable for the content and accuracy of the individual Reviews and the aggregated Reviews.