|
 | Richard D. GlovskyPartner
Prince Lobel Glovsky & Tye LLP
100 Cambridge Street, Suite 2200
Boston, Massachusetts
02114
(Suffolk Co.)
Telephone: 617-456-8012
Fax: 617-456-8100
http://www.princelobel.com/attorneys-13.html
|
Profile Visibility  | | #744 in weekly profile views out of 12,337 lawyers in Boston, Massachusetts | | #60,152 in weekly profile views out of 968,464 total lawyers Overall |
|
|
| |
| Practice Areas | Employment Law(60%); Civil Litigation(25%); Appellate Practice(10%); Domestic Relations(5%) | | | Education | Boston College Law School, J.D., 1972, Dartmouth College, B.A., 1969 | | | Admitted | 1972, Massachusetts; 1975, District of Columbia; 2005, New York; U.S. Supreme Court; U.S. Court of Appeals, First and Sixth Circuits; U.S. District Court, District of Massachusetts | |
| Born | Boston, Massachusetts, August 27, 1947 | | | Biography | Editor, Boston College Law Review, 1971-1972. Attorney/Advisor, Office of Legal Counsel, Department of Justice, 1973-1975. Assistant United States Attorney, 1975-1980 and Chief, Civil Division, 1978-1980, District of Massachusetts. President, Hanify, King & Glovsky, 1980-1983. Founding Partner, Glovsky & Tarlow, 1983-2000. Partner, Prince, Lobel, Glovsky & Tye, 2000—. Fellow: Massachusetts Bar Foundation; Litigation Counsel of America. | | | Reported Cases | Phelan v. May Department Stores Company, 443 Mass. 52 (2004); United States v. Cloutier, 966 F.2d 24 (1st Cir. 1992); United States v. Maguire, 918 F.2d 254 (1st Cir. 1990); United States v. Rengifo, 858 F.2d 800 (1st Cir. 1988); United States v. Dejesus, 752 F.2d 640 (1st Cir. 1985); United States v. Smith, 726 F.2d 852 (1st Cir. 1984); United States v. Budzyna, 666 F.2d 666 (1st Cir. 1984); United States v. Cermark, 622 F.2d 1049 (1st Cir. 1980); United States v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority, 614 F.2d 27 (1st Cir. 1980); N.A.A.C.P. v. Harris, 607 F.2d 514 (1st Cir. 1979); Falzarano v. United States, 607 F.2d 506 (1st Cir. 1979); O'Connor v. Yezukevicz, 589 F.2d 16 (1st Cir. 1978); American Science And Engineering, Inc. v. Califano, 571 F.2d 58 (1st Cir. 1978); Tauton Gardens Co. v. Hills, 57 F.2d 877 (1st Cir. 1977); Weiss v. United States, 146 F.Supp.2d 113 (D.Mass. 2001); New England Welding Contractors Inc. v. Hydra-Machinery Sales Inc., 704 F.Supp. 315 (D.Mass. 1989); United States v. Smith, 587 F.Supp. 653 (D.Mass. 1984); Daley v. United States, 499 F.Supp. 1005 (D.Mass. 1980); Gledhill v. Harris, 492 F.Supp. 1018 (D.Mass. 1980); Armor Elevator Co., Inc. v. Phoenix Urban Corporation, 493 F.Supp. 876 (D.Mass. 1980); Doe v. Sharp, 491 F.Supp. 346 (D.Mass. 1980); Becton v. United States, 489 F.Supp. 134 (D.Mass. 1980); Gerritson v. Vance, 488 F.Supp. 267 (D.Mass. 1980); Leduc v. Harris, 488 F.Supp. 588 (D.Mass. 1980); Gregory v. United States, 448 F.Supp. 126 (D.Mass. 1978); Commonwealth v. Hills, 437 F.Supp. 351(D.Mass. 1977); Taunton Gardens Co. v. Hills, 421 F.Supp. 524 (D.Mass. 1976); Harris v. United States, 424 F.Supp. 627 (D.Mass. 1976); Ziviak v. United States, 411 F.Supp. 416 (D.Mass. 1976); Farmer v. Dir. Trans. Systems, 1981 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13910 (D.Mass. 1981); United States v. Devito, 1982 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13986 (D.Mass. 1982); Blanck v. Harris, 1983 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12172 (D.Mass. 1983); United States v. Smith, 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 26170 (1st Cir. 1983); N.A.A.C.P. v. Harris, 1981 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10552 (D.Mass. 1981); In Re Mahoney Hawkes, LLP, 272 B.R. 19 (1st Cir. 2002); In Re Attlebrook Properties, 37 B.R. 338 (D. Mass. 1983). | | | ISLN | 907052560 | |
Documents by this lawyer on Martindale.com
New Law is a Potential Minefield for EmployersJoseph L. Edwards, Richard D. Glovsky, February 26, 2009 The Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act, which was signed into law today by President Obama, extends the time for an employee alleging pay discrimination to file a lawsuit.
Supreme Court Expands Reach of Anti-Retaliation ProtectionsLaurie F. Rubin, Richard D. Glovsky, June 17, 2009 On Monday of this week, the Supreme Court issued a decision expanding the anti-retaliation protections of federal law. Title VII prohibits retaliation against employees who "oppose" discriminatory practices or who "participate" in EEOC-related investigations - the aptly named... |
|
|
RSS | Blog | Advertising Opportunities | Site Map | Contact Us
