Richard advises clients on all aspects of intellectual property litigation, including patent, copyright, trademark, and trade secret litigation and related antitrust and unfair competition matters. He has represented numerous Fortune 100 companies in intellectual property infringement cases nationwide.
A registered patent attorney, Richard handles all forms of post-grant proceedings, including ex-parte re-examinations, inter-partes reviews (IPRs), covered business method (CBM) reviews, and post-grant reviews (PGRs). Richard also counsels companies in the development, protection, and licensing of their intellectual property portfolios, with a particular emphasis on computer software, telecommunications (including 3G, 4G and 4G LTE), medical devices and diagnostics. He also provides patentability, non-infringement, and invalidity opinions in a variety of technology areas and serves on Mintz Levin's Opinion Committee.
Richard has extensive experience performing intellectual property audits and due diligence for high tech and life sciences companies and investors in connection with various commercial transactions, including mergers and acquisitions, private placements and underwritten public offerings. He advises clients in structuring and negotiating a wide variety of technology transactions, including patent, trademark, and copyright licenses, software and database licenses, stock and asset acquisition agreements, strategic alliances, joint ventures, collaboration agreements, sponsored research agreements, and materials transfer agreements. Richard also has substantial experience in the valuation, monetization and securitization of royalty streams and other intellectual property assets.
Richard also completed his executive mediation training at Harvard Law School's Program on Negotiation.
Before joining Mintz Levin, Richard was a senior attorney at the intellectual property law firm of Fish & Neave in New York City. He began his legal career with Brown & Wood, where he practiced in the Securities and Mergers and Acquisitions departments.
During law school, he was Articles Editor for the Rutgers Law Journal.
• Mintz Levin Represents Underwriters Jefferies & Company and Leerink Swann, LLC in $20 Million Public Offering of Unilife Corporation, ( 07.09.2012 )
• Quoted in IP Legislation and Regulation to Watch in 2012, Law360 ( 01.10.2012 )
• Quoted in Quest for Patents Brings a New Focus in Technology Deals, The New York Times ( 08.17.2011 )
• Mintz Levin Represents Oppenheimer & Co., Inc. in Back-to-Back Closings of Two Offerings, ( 11.30.2009 )
• Richard G. Gervase and Julian Crump to moderate panel discussion at AdvaMed 2008 - The MedTech Conference, ( 09.23.2008 )
• Co-author, Federal Circuit Says District Courts Should Freely Grant Stays When CBM Proceeding Instituted, Intellectual Property Alert ( 11.25.2014 )
• Co-author, Computer Implementation Not Enough to Render Abstract Ideas Patent Eligible, Intellectual Property Alert ( 06.20.2014 )
• Co-author, Supreme Court Holds That Reverse Payment Patent Settlements Are Subject to Antitrust Scrutiny, Joint Alert: Antitrust Intellectual Property ( 06.21.2013 )
• Co-author, U.S. Supreme Court Rules That Isolated Human Genes Are Unpatentable, Intellectual Property Alert ( 06.13.2013 )
• Co-author, Patent Eligibility of Software Innovations After CLS Bank, Intellectual Property Advisory ( 05.17.2013 )
• Co-author, Online Copyright Liability and Safe Harbors, New York Law Journal ( 07.12.2012 )
• Co-author, The Kodak Bankruptcy: The Valuation and Sale of IP Assets, The Bankruptcy Strategist ( 04.01.2012 )
• Co-author, Supreme Court Invalidates Biotech Method Patent in Mayo v. Prometheus, Intellectual Property Alert ( 03.26.2012 )
• Co-author, Federal Circuit Affirms ITC's Extraterritorial Authority in Trade Secret Cases, Intellectual Property Alert ( 10.17.2011 )
• Co-author, Invention Assignment Following Stanford v. Roche: Implications for Technology Transfer and Government Contracts, Energy & Clean Technology Alert ( 06.27.2011 )
• Co-author, Invention Assignment Following Stanford v. Roche: Implications for Technology Transfer and Government Contracts, Life Sciences Alert ( 06.24.2011 )
• Moderator, As if AIA Hasn't Brought Enough Change - Patent Litigation Reform is Looming in the US, 2014 BIO International Convention, BIO, San Diego, CA (06.25.2014)
• Panelist, The America Invents Act: 1 Year Later, New York BIO Conference 2014, New York Biotechnology Association, New York, NY (05.15.2014)
• Speaker, Patent Prosecution and Enforcement Issues in Collaboration and Licence Agreements, Top Trends for IP: Hot issues in Patent Prosecution and Collaborations, BIA, Mintz Levin, and One Nucleus, Cambridge, UK (03.20.2014)
• Speaker, An Interactive Open Floor Discussion on Proposed Legislation on Non-Practicing Entities, Comprehensive Guide to Patent Reform, American Conference Institute, New York, NY (01.23.2014)
• Speaker, Post-Grant Proceedings Under the America Invents Act, Association of Corporate Counsel, Northeast Chapter (11.13.2013)
• Speaker, A Discussion of the Supreme Court's Mayo v. Prometheus Decision: Clarity or Confusion?, Mintz Levin, Webinar (04.18.2012)
• Chair, Recent Developments in U.S. and European Patent La, AdvaMed 2009, AdvaMed (10.13.2009)
• Speaker, Israel Venture Network, New York, NY (07.29.2009)
• Moderator, When Cash is King - Strategies and Trends for Royalty Monetization, BIO CEO & Investor Conference, New York, NY (02.10.2009) (Also at Stamford, CT Offices)