Practice Areas - Patent Litigation
- Intellectual Property Licensing
| - Intellectual Property Litigation
|
|
|
|
| Contact Info | Telephone: 312-551-9500
Fax: 312-551-9501
http://www.fg-law.com
|
|
| University | University of Chicago, A.B., Physics, with honors, 1992 |
|
| Law School | University of Michigan, J.D., 1995 |
|
| Admitted | 1995, Illinois and U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois; 1996, U.S. District Court, District of Arizona; 1998, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Michigan and U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit; 2000, U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit; 2001, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Wisconsin; 2002, U.S. District Court, District of Colorado; 2003, U.S. District Court, Western District of Wisconsin; 2009, U.S. Supreme Court; registered to practice before U.S. Patent and Trademark Office |
|
| Born | January 16, 1970 |
|
| Biography | Executive Production Editor, Michigan Journal of International Law. Law Clerk to Judge Brian Barnett Duff, U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois, 1995-1996. Author: Note, "U.S. Government Control over the Export of Scientific Data and Other Technical Information: Holes in the Sieve," 16 Michigan Journal of International Law, 583, 1995; "Is the United States Finally Ready for a Patent Small Claims Court," Minnesota Journal of Law, Science and Technology, 2009. Co-author: "Are Patent Trolls Really Undermining the Patent System?" IP Litigator, September/October 2006; "Obviousness after KSR v. Teleflex: a Private Practice Perspective," Intellectual Asset Management Magazine, July 2007, reprinted in IP Litigator, July/August 2007; "Don't Assume a Can Opener: Confronting Patent Economic Theory with Licensing and Enforcement Reality," Columbia Science and Technology Law Review, 2011. Registered to practice before the United States Patent and Trademark Office. |
|
| Reported Cases | 1st Technology v. Rational Enterprises, 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 21721 (Fed. Cir. 2008) (argued and won affirmance without opinion of $50 million judgment); HyperPhrase Technologies, LLC v. Google, Inc., 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 29796 (Fed. Cir. 2007) (argued and won reversal-in-part for patentee of summary judgment of noninfringement); IMS Technology, Inc. v. Haas Automation, Inc., 206 F.3d 1422, 1430 (Fed. Cir. 2000) (argued and won reversal for patentee of summary judgment of noninfringement). |
|
| ISLN | 910082974 |
|
Documents by this lawyer on Martindale.com | |
Don't Assume a Can Opener: Confronting Patent Economic Theory with Licensing and Enforcement RealityCatherine Cottle,Robert P. Greenspoon, June 13, 2011, previously published by Columbia Science and Technology Law Review on Spring/Summer 2011 Many different kinds of entities use the United States patent system, from individual inventors, to start-ups, to patent assertion entities, to massive operating companies. Meanwhile, “reward theory,” “prospect theory,” and “commercialization theory” are three... |
View Ratings & Reviews |
Profile Visibility  | | #5,139 in weekly profile views out of 39,821 lawyers in Chicago, Illinois | | #185,926 in weekly profile views out of 1,447,639 total lawyers Overall |
|
|