- Insurance Defense
- Criminal Defense
- Personal Injury
- Commercial Litigation
University of Nebraska at Kearney, B.S., 1991
University of South Dakota, J.D., 1994
1994, South Dakota; 1995, Nebraska; 1997, U.S. District Court, District of Nebraska; 1998, U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit; 2001, U.S. District Court, District of South Dakota; 2009, U.S. Supreme Court
Nebraska State Bar Association (Member, Young Lawyers Executive Committee; Treasurer, 2001-2002; Chair, 2003-2004); State Bar of South Dakota; Defense Research Institute; Nebraska House of Delegates.
Scottsbluff, Nebraska, November 2, 1968
Ronald E. Temple was born in Scottsbluff, Nebraska, on November 2, 1968. He received his education at University of Nebraska-Kearney, where he received a Bachelor of Science degree in Psychology and Criminal Justice in 1991. He earned his Juris Doctorate degree from the University of South Dakota School of Law in 1994. Mr. Temple is a member of the Nebraska State Bar Association and the State Bar of South Dakota. He is licensed to practice in all Nebraska and South Dakota State Courts as well as the United States District Court for the District of Nebraska and the District of South Dakota and the United States Court of Appeals for the 8th Circuit. In 2003, Mr. Temple was elected Chair of the Young Lawyers Division of the Nebraska State Bar Association. Mr. Temple practices law in the areas of criminal defense, personal injury, insurance defense, automobile negligence, products liability and commercial litigation.
State v. Sandoval 280 Neb. 309 (2010) (Capital case wherein "mental anguish" portion of aggravating circumstance declared unconstitutional); Volquardson v. Hartford, 264 Neb. 337 (2002) (First impression case, recognizing innocent co-insured's right to recover under homeowner's insurance policy); State v. MINER, 273 Neb. 837 (2007) (Recognizing application of double jeopardy clause on certain type of theft case and reversed conviction); Krusemark v. Thurston County Bd. of Eq., 10 Neb. App. 35 (2001) (Court determined that procedural due process applied at administrative hearing and reversed).
Disclaimer: No representation is made that the quality of legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers. The testimonial or endorsement does not constitute a guarantee, warranty, or prediction regarding the outcome of your legal matter. Any result that the endorsed lawyer or law firm may achieve on behalf of one client in one matter does not necessarily indicate that similar results can be obtained for other clients. Past success cannot be an assurance of future success because each case must be decided on its own merits. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Martindale-Hubbell® does not undertake to develop a Client Review Rating or Peer Review Rating for all firms and/or lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed as unfavorable. Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for and will not be liable for the content and accuracy of the individual Reviews and the aggregated Reviews.
Documents by this lawyer on Martindale.com