- Immigration Law
- Employment Authorizations
- Employment Immigration
- Labor Certifications
- Permanent Visas
- Removal Proceedings
- Family Immigration Law
- Immigration and Naturalization
Antioch College, B.A., 1981
Brooklyn Law School, J.D., 1985, cum laude
1986, New York and Illinois; U.S. Supreme Court; U.S. Court of Appeals, First, Sixth, Seventh, Eighth and Ninth Circuits; U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois; U.S. District Court, Western District of Michigan
Chicago, New York State, Illinois State and American Bar Associations; American Immigration Lawyers Association.
Bace v. Ashcroft, 352 F.3d 1133 (7th Cir. 2003); Bereza v. INS, 115 F.3d 458 (7th Cir. 1997); Boukhris v. Perryman, 2002 U.S. Dist LEXIS 1913 (N.D.IL); Bucur v. INS, 109 F.3d 399 (7th Cir. 1997); Cardona v. United State INS, 1995 U.S. Dist LEXIS 1853 (N.D. IL); Cervantes-Manzo v. INS, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 22406 (7th Cir. 2000); Kuhai v. INS, 199 F.3d 209 (7th Cir. 1999); Mazur v. INS, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17936 (N.D. IL); Morales-Morales v. Ashcroft, 384 F.3d 418 (7th Cir. 2004); Palacios v. Perryman, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 18179 (7th Cir.); Pop v. INS, 279 F.3d 457 (7th Cir. 2002); Sileikis v. Perryman, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12737 (N.D. IL); Singh v. Perryman, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18481 (N.D. IL 1998); Stroe v. INS, 256 F.3d 498 (7th Cir. 2001); Wigglesworth v. INS, 319 F.3d 951 (7th Cir. 2003); Wlostowska v. INS, 2003 U.S. App LEXIS 2793 (9th Cir. 2003); Yang et al. v. INS, 109 F.3d 1185 (7th Cir. 1997).
Disclaimer: No representation is made that the quality of legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers. The testimonial or endorsement does not constitute a guarantee, warranty, or prediction regarding the outcome of your legal matter. Any result that the endorsed lawyer or law firm may achieve on behalf of one client in one matter does not necessarily indicate that similar results can be obtained for other clients. Past success cannot be an assurance of future success because each case must be decided on its own merits. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Martindale-Hubbell® does not undertake to develop a Client Review Rating or Peer Review Rating for all firms and/or lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed as unfavorable. Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for and will not be liable for the content and accuracy of the individual Reviews and the aggregated Reviews.
Documents by this lawyer on Martindale.com