Semmes, Bowen & Semmes A Professional Corporation

 – Firm Profile
 




Semmes, Bowen & Semmes <br />A Professional Corporation Law Firm Logo

Semmes, Bowen & Semmes
A Professional Corporation
 

Size of Organization: 77
Year Established: 1887
Main Office: Baltimore, Maryland
Web Site: http://www.semmes.com

Telephone: 410-539-5040
Facsimile: 410-539-5223



Profile Visibility
#377 in weekly profile views out of 280,573 total law firms Overall

Icon for Featured Peer Review Rated LawyerIcon for Featured Peer Review Rated Lawyer at this firm


Administrative LawAlternative Dispute Resolution
ArbitrationAsset Protection
Bankruptcy LawBusiness Law
Class ActionsConstruction Law
Corporate LawCreditors Rights
Eminent DomainEnvironmental Law
General PracticeInsurance Defense
Insurance LawIntellectual Property Law
Labor and Employment LawLand Use Law
Legislative PracticeMergers and Acquisitions
Personal InjuryPremises Liability
Professional LiabilityReal Estate Law
Securities LawTax Law
Toxic TortsTrademark, Copyright, and Unfair Competition
Trusts and Estates, Wills and ProbateWorkers Compensation
 
               Learn More

 

Commitment to Diversity

Semmes recognizes that excellence and success is achieved through the recruitment and retention of attorneys and staff with diverse backgrounds and experience. We are committed to promoting and preserving respect for the individual at every level. We understand that through the collaborative efforts of a diverse workforce we advance our understanding, perspective and appreciation of the wider community and the cultures of the clients we serve. Diversity is a primary focus of our recruitment strategy to employ qualified men and women who, through their different backgrounds, experiences, personalities and perspectives, can contribute added value to our clients. Semmes' Diversity Committee actively promotes and monitors the diversity objectives of the Firm. The Firm participates in the Black Law Students Association (BLSA) Minority Law Student Recruiting Job Fairs and Conferences, the Minority Clerkship Program, and local and regional bar association diversity recruitment and retention programs, including those offered by The Baltimore City and Maryland Bar Associations.

Semmes is an EEO/AA Employer.



Martindale-Hubbell has augmented a firm's provided information with third-party sourced data to present a more comprehensive overview of the firm's expertise:
U.S. Federal Litigation Activity
Source: U.S. Federal Civil District Court Databases. Powered by LexisNexis atVantage

Highest number of cases by Semmes, Bowen & Semmes
A Professional Corporation:
Toxic Torts (274 cases in past two years)
Peer Review Ratings

Total number of Peer Review Rated lawyers of Semmes, Bowen & Semmes
A Professional Corporation: 32


Documents by Semmes, Bowen & Semmes
A Professional Corporation on Martindale.com

Subscribe to this feed

Defendant Host Did Not Breach Duty to Minor Plaintiff Who Was Injured in ATV Accident at his Property Where Plaintiff’s Father Permitted Plaintiff to Participate in the Activity and Knew or Should Have Known of Its Risks
Colleen K. O'Brien, February 25, 2015
In Lasley v. Hylton, No. 132408 (Supreme Court of Virginia, October 31, 2014), the Court examined the legal duty owed by a host to a child social guest when the child’s parent is present and supervising the child, which was an issue of first impression for this Court. In the underlying case,...

Defendant’s Removal Is Frustrated by Plaintiff’s Multiple Amendments to Complaint and an Action that Was Proceeding in Three (3) Courts Simultaneously
Colleen K. O'Brien, February 25, 2015
In Johnson v. Citibank, N.A., No. PWG-14-3024 (U.S. District Court of Maryland, December 5, 2014), the Court examined a complicated case of unsuccessful federal removal. After initially filing a case pro se in Maryland State District Court setting forth, inter alia, violation of the Fair Credit...

Fourth Circuit Affirms Grant of Summary Judgment for Physician-Plaintiffs and Holds That North Carolina Display of Real-Time View Requirement Violates First Amendment
Jhanelle A. Graham, February 25, 2015
At issue before the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in Gretchen Stuart v. Paul Camnitz, was a North Carolina statute that required physicians to perform an ultrasound, display the sonogram, and describe the fetus to women seeking abortions. According to the statute, a...






 

Complete a Client Review


Have you recently worked with this firm? Share your experience as a Client of this firm and complete a Client Review to help others make an informed choice when hiring legal counsel.
 
 

Compare this Firm

Compare this firm to other firms in your Favorites.
 

Add to Favorites

As a registered user of martindale.com Connected, you can add law firms to your list of Favorites. You can securely add comments and compare the law firms in your Favorites.