Semmes, Bowen & Semmes A Professional Corporation

 – Firm Profile
 




Semmes, Bowen & Semmes <br />A Professional Corporation Law Firm Logo

Semmes, Bowen & Semmes
A Professional Corporation
 

Size of Organization: 73
Year Established: 1887
Main Office: Baltimore, Maryland
Web Site: http://www.semmes.com

Telephone: 410-539-5040
Facsimile: 410-539-5223



Profile Visibility
#507 in weekly profile views out of 281,362 total law firms Overall

Icon for Featured Peer Review Rated LawyerIcon for Featured Peer Review Rated Lawyer at this firm


Administrative LawAlternative Dispute Resolution
ArbitrationAsset Protection
Bankruptcy LawBusiness Law
Class ActionsConstruction Law
Corporate LawCreditors Rights
Eminent DomainEnvironmental Law
General PracticeInsurance Defense
Insurance LawIntellectual Property Law
Labor and Employment LawLand Use Law
Legislative PracticeMergers and Acquisitions
Personal InjuryPremises Liability
Professional LiabilityReal Estate Law
Securities LawTax Law
Toxic TortsTrademark, Copyright, and Unfair Competition
Trusts and Estates, Wills and ProbateWorkers Compensation
 
               Learn More

 

Commitment to Diversity

Semmes recognizes that excellence and success is achieved through the recruitment and retention of attorneys and staff with diverse backgrounds and experience. We are committed to promoting and preserving respect for the individual at every level. We understand that through the collaborative efforts of a diverse workforce we advance our understanding, perspective and appreciation of the wider community and the cultures of the clients we serve. Diversity is a primary focus of our recruitment strategy to employ qualified men and women who, through their different backgrounds, experiences, personalities and perspectives, can contribute added value to our clients. Semmes' Diversity Committee actively promotes and monitors the diversity objectives of the Firm. The Firm participates in the Black Law Students Association (BLSA) Minority Law Student Recruiting Job Fairs and Conferences, the Minority Clerkship Program, and local and regional bar association diversity recruitment and retention programs, including those offered by The Baltimore City and Maryland Bar Associations.

Semmes is an EEO/AA Employer.



Martindale-Hubbell has augmented a firm's provided information with third-party sourced data to present a more comprehensive overview of the firm's expertise:
U.S. Federal Litigation Activity
Source: U.S. Federal Civil District Court Databases. Powered by LexisNexis atVantage

Highest number of cases by Semmes, Bowen & Semmes
A Professional Corporation:
Toxic Torts (274 cases in past two years)
Peer Review Ratings

Total number of Peer Review Rated lawyers of Semmes, Bowen & Semmes
A Professional Corporation: 30


Documents by Semmes, Bowen & Semmes
A Professional Corporation on Martindale.com

Subscribe to this feed

Attempt to Void Final Judgment in Prior Debt Collection Case Barred by Principles of Res Judicata and Collateral Estoppel
Caroline E. Willsey, July 28, 2015
In Mostofi v. Midland Funding, LLC, et al., No. 1084, (Court of Special Appeals of Maryland, July 2, 2015), the Court of Special Appeals decided whether a subsequent lawsuit brought by Mr. Mostofi, which sought to challenge the final judgment in a prior debt collection case, was barred by...

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland Finds that A Court May Rely On Circumstantial Evidence in a Lead Paint Personal Injury Case
Nida Kanwal, July 28, 2015
Myishia Smith filed a negligence suit against Rowhouses, Inc., a property manager, alleging she was poisoned as a child as a result of ingesting lead-based paint inside the Oliver Street Property. Smith was born in 1991. According to her mother, the first home in which Smith lived, the Monroe...

Rooker-Feldman Doctrine Requires Remand of Part of Plaintiff’s Class Action Complaint, but Remaining Counts Will Remain in Federal Court
Colleen K. O'Brien, July 14, 2015
Murray v. Midland Funding, LLC, Civ. No. JKB-15-0532 (June 23, 2015), was removed from State to Federal court under the Class Action Fairness Act (“CAFA”), codified at 28 U.S.C. § 1332(d) and § 1453. The Plaintiff filed a Motion to Remand, which was granted in part and denied...






 

Complete a Client Review


Have you recently worked with this firm? Share your experience as a Client of this firm and complete a Client Review to help others make an informed choice when hiring legal counsel.
 
 

Compare this Firm

Compare this firm to other firms in your Favorites.
 

Add to Favorites

As a registered user of martindale.com Connected, you can add law firms to your list of Favorites. You can securely add comments and compare the law firms in your Favorites.