Legal Articles: Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP

 







Document(s) published by this organization: 244


View Page: Prev  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next  >>
Show: results per page
Sort by:

HTMLStripping the ACA of Both the Carrot and the Stick: Sticking it to Consumers On and Off the Federal Exchange
Florence T. Wang, Ken Yood; Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
March 23, 2015, previously published on March 13, 2015
Even as we write and you read, the Supreme Court in King v. Burwell is considering whether qualifying (often low income) individuals and families who have an opportunity to purchase healthcare coverage through the Affordable Care Act’s (“ACA’s”) federal exchange also have...

 

HTMLMedicare ACO v. 3.0—More Risk, More Money?
Aytan Dahukey, Florence T. Wang; Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
March 23, 2015, previously published on March 12, 2015
The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) announced on March 10, 2015 that it is adding a new Accountable Care Organization (ACO) model to its cadre of innovative models. Titled the “Next Generation ACO Model,” CMS’ new ACO model allows provider groups to assume higher levels of...

 

HTMLRead the Directions Carefully Before Playing: State Department Releases Military Drone Export Guidance
Reid Whitten; Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
March 18, 2015, previously published on March 5, 2015
The United States has a responsibility, or so the State Department tells us, to ensure the sales and exports of Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS) are consistent with U.S. national security interests, U.S. policy, and even U.S. values. While the government would be glad to keep the export of military...

 

HTMLU.S. Supreme Court Holds Agency Interpretations Are Not Subject To Notice-and-Comment Rulemaking Requirement
Karina A. Layugan, Marlene M. Nicolas; Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
March 18, 2015, previously published on March 16, 2015
In 2004, the DOL revamped its regulations regarding the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) administrative exemption. In 2006, the Bush DOL issued an opinion letter finding that mortgage loan officers qualified for the administrative exemption. In 2010, the Obama DOL withdrew the 2006 opinion letter...

 

HTMLAdd Importers to Those Facing Expanding Whistleblower Claims under the False Claims Act
Curtis M. Dombek, Neil Ray; Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
March 18, 2015, previously published on March 5, 2015
On February 12, 2015, the Department of Justice (DOJ) announced that three U.S.-based importers had agreed to pay more than $3 million to resolve a lawsuit brought by the United States under the False Claims Act (FCA) alleging that they had made false declarations to U.S. Customs and Border...

 

HTMLCalifornia Makes Anti-Bullying Training A Component Of Mandatory Harassment Training
Will (Won Bin) Kim, Marlene M. Nicolas; Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
March 18, 2015, previously published on March 10, 2015
California employers with more than 50 employees must include “abusive conduct” prevention training in their mandatory harassment prevention training. Assembly Bill No. 2053 expanded the scope of training required by Government Code Section 12950.1, which requires employers with 50 or...

 

HTMLSecond Circuit Reiterates: Bigger Hurdles For Employers Under Big Apple’s Anti-Discrimination Law
Brian DeShannon, Adam Pekor; Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
March 18, 2015, previously published on March 10, 2015
On February 13, 2015, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit reiterated that courts must analyze claims under the New York City Human Rights Law (“NYCHRL”) “separately and independently from any [related] federal and state law claims.”

 

HTMLAscertainability Saps Plaintiffs’ Energy in Dietary Supplement Class Action
Paul Seeley; Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
March 18, 2015, previously published on March 4, 2015
In the recent decision Mirabella v. Vital Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Case No. 12-62086-CIV-ZLOCH (S.D. Fl. Feb. 27, 2015) the plaintiffs attempted, but failed, to certify a nationwide class of all purchasers of an energy drink that allegedly caused harmful side-effects. The plaintiffs brought claims...

 

HTMLFinal Anti-Trafficking Rule to Impose New - and Uncertain - Obligations on Contractors
Derek R. Mullins; Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
March 18, 2015, previously published on February 25, 2015
In late January, the FAR Council issued its long-awaited final rule amending the FAR to strengthen the U.S. Government’s policy against human trafficking. As discussed below, the amendments may have far-reaching compliance implications for government contractors.

 

HTMLYou Again?: Application of the First-to-File Bar Where Subsequent Actions Are Brought By the Same Relator
Charles L. Kreindler, Barbara E. Taylor; Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
March 18, 2015, previously published on February 25, 2015
The Federal False Claims Act (“FCA”), 31 U.S.C. § 3729, et seq., has unique procedural aspects that come into play when a private whistleblower (the “relator”) seeks to sue on behalf of the Government. One of these, the so-called “first-to-file” bar, applies...

 


View Page: Prev  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next  >>