Legal Articles: Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP

 







Document(s) published by this organization: 118


View Page: Prev  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next  >>
Show: results per page
Sort by:

HTMLCalifornia Makes Anti-Bullying Training A Component Of Mandatory Harassment Training
Will (Won Bin) Kim, Marlene M. Nicolas; Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
March 18, 2015, previously published on March 10, 2015
California employers with more than 50 employees must include “abusive conduct” prevention training in their mandatory harassment prevention training. Assembly Bill No. 2053 expanded the scope of training required by Government Code Section 12950.1, which requires employers with 50 or...

 

HTMLHospices To Self-Report Cap Without Sequestration; MACs To Capture Sequestration Later
Brian M. Daucher; Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
March 18, 2015, previously published on March 5, 2015
This week, the Medicare Administrative Contractors issued instructions for hospices to self-report FY 2014 hospice cap (reports due this month, March 31, 2015). These instructions include a spreadsheet substantially similar to what we offered earlier this year. Hospices that fail to submit reports...

 

HTMLThe Fourth Circuit Strengthens the FCA’s Implied Certification Theory in Triple Canopy
Matthew W. Turetzky; Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
March 18, 2015, previously published on February 25, 2015
Under the “implied certification” theory of liability, a government contractor can violate the False Claims Act (“FCA”) by submitting a mere invoice for payment. The theory is that the invoice’s submission impliedly certifies compliance with contract conditions. If a...

 

HTML“Unlimited” Time Off Policies - Fad or Fun?
Paul S. Cowie; Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
March 18, 2015, previously published on March 17, 2015
Over the past several years the concept of “unlimited” vacation policies have sprung up around the philosophy that it allows companies to treat its employees with respect and empower them to make their own decisions regarding when to work and when to play. Being at the center of...

 

HTMLAscertainability Saps Plaintiffs’ Energy in Dietary Supplement Class Action
Paul Seeley; Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
March 18, 2015, previously published on March 4, 2015
In the recent decision Mirabella v. Vital Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Case No. 12-62086-CIV-ZLOCH (S.D. Fl. Feb. 27, 2015) the plaintiffs attempted, but failed, to certify a nationwide class of all purchasers of an energy drink that allegedly caused harmful side-effects. The plaintiffs brought claims...

 

HTMLU.S. Supreme Court Holds Agency Interpretations Are Not Subject To Notice-and-Comment Rulemaking Requirement
Karina A. Layugan, Marlene M. Nicolas; Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
March 18, 2015, previously published on March 16, 2015
In 2004, the DOL revamped its regulations regarding the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) administrative exemption. In 2006, the Bush DOL issued an opinion letter finding that mortgage loan officers qualified for the administrative exemption. In 2010, the Obama DOL withdrew the 2006 opinion letter...

 

HTMLRead the Directions Carefully Before Playing: State Department Releases Military Drone Export Guidance
Reid Whitten; Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
March 18, 2015, previously published on March 5, 2015
The United States has a responsibility, or so the State Department tells us, to ensure the sales and exports of Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS) are consistent with U.S. national security interests, U.S. policy, and even U.S. values. While the government would be glad to keep the export of military...

 

HTMLCourt Finds that Class Action Plaintiffs’ False Advertising Claims are Stripped Bayer Based on Federal Preemption
Paul Seeley; Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
March 18, 2015, previously published on March 17, 2015
In the recent case of Gallagher v. Bayer AG, Case No. 14-cv-04601-WHO (N.D. Cal. March 10, 2015), the plaintiffs asserted that the defendants Bayer AG and related entities (collectively, “Bayer”) engaged in false advertising under California, New York, and Florida law. The products in...

 

HTMLSecond Circuit Holds That SIPA Does Not Permit an Inflation or Interest Adjustment to “Net Equity” Claims For Customer Property
Tyler E. Baker, Manuel F. Gomez, John P. Stigi; Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
March 18, 2015, previously published on February 27, 2015
In In re Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC, No. 14-97-bk(L), 2015 WL 727965 (2d Cir. Feb. 20, 2015), the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held that no adjustment for inflation or interest could be made under the Securities Investor Protection Act, 15 U.S.C. §...

 

HTMLPRC Foreign Investment Draft Law: What You Should Know
Jiamu Sun; Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
March 18, 2015, previously published on March 5, 2015
On January 19, 2015, China’s foreign investment regulatory authority Ministry of Commerce (“MOFCOM”) released a draft of new Foreign Investment Law (“Draft Law”) (See blog article Comparison Chart re JV Law and Foreign Investment Law Draft for Comments dated February...

 


View Page: Prev  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next  >>