Document(s) published by this organization: 350
Show: results per page
|New EEOC Guidelines Regarding Employers’ Obligations With Respect to Background Checks and Accommodation of Religious Dress and Grooming Practices|
Robert Mussig; Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP;
July 9, 2014, previously published on June 25, 2014The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) recently announced new guidelines that may impact the way employers conduct background checks and accommodate religious dress and grooming practices.
|Top 5 Actions to Consider for the New York Not-for-Profit Law Overhaul Effective on July 1|
Jay Gerzog, Tamar Rosenberg; Sheppard Mullin Richter Hampton LLP;
July 9, 2014, previously published on July 2, 2014On July 1, 2014, the New York Nonprofit Revitalization Act (the “Act”) took effect. The Act is the most significant modification of New York’s Not-for-Profit Corporation Law (the “NPCL”) in approximately 40 years.
|The Supreme Court’s Ruling in Hobby Lobby that Closely Held, For-Profit Companies Should Receive Religious Exemptions From ObamaCare’s Conception Mandate Likely Will Have Little Practical Impact Immediately in the Employment Arena|
Gregg A. Fisch, Nick Schnermann; Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP;
July 9, 2014, previously published on June 30, 2014On June 30, 2014, the US Supreme Court decided the case of Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. in a 5-4 decision along partisan lines. The Court ruled that closely held, for-profit companies are entitled to certain religious freedom protections from generally applicable regulations that violate the...
|Lessons From A Cautionary Tale of Electronic Discovery Pitfalls in Health Care Litigation|
David Douglass; Sheppard Mullin Richter Hampton LLP;
July 9, 2014, previously published on June 27, 2014E-discovery is especially challenging in healthcare related litigation due to the healthcare industry’s reliance on electronically stored information (ESI), the volume of medical records often at issue in health care litigation, especially, qui tam litigation, the time periods often at issue...
|California Supreme Court Issues Iskanian Decision, Ruling that Class Action Waivers in Arbitration Agreements Are Enforceable, But Still Allows PAGA Claims to Proceed on Representative Basis|
Gregg A. Fisch; Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP;
July 9, 2014, previously published on June 24, 2014On June 23, 2014, the California Supreme Court issued its decision in Iskanian v. CLS Transportation Los Angeles, LLC, confirming that an express class action waiver in an employment arbitration agreement is enforceable under California law. In its decision, the Court held that its earlier decision...
|Cal. Supreme Court Clarifies Standards for Class Certification of Independent Contract Class Actions|
Thomas R. Kaufman; Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP;
July 9, 2014, previously published on July 2, 2014On Monday, the California Supreme Court issued yet another decision on class certification; this time in an action challenging the independent contractor (“IC”) classification of a proposed class of Antelope Valley News newspaper deliverers, Ayala v. Antelope Valley Newspapers, Inc....
|Of Characterization and Common Sense: Court Holds That Erroneous Interpretation of Allegations of Complaint Doom Counterclaim to Bottom of Chicken Coop|
Don T. Hibner, Thomas D. Nevins; Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP;
July 7, 2014, previously published on June 30, 2014In In Re Processed Egg Products Antitrust Litigation, No. 2:08-Md.-02002-GP (E.D. Pa., June 10, 2014), the plaintiffs alleged that they purchased eggs from the defendant egg producing cooperatives, and that the plaintiffs had required that defendants provide only eggs that complied with a...
|A “Virtual Merger” is Underway between Chicago-Area Alexian Brothers Health System and Adventist Midwest Health|
Eric A. Klein; Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP;
July 4, 2014, previously published on June 25, 2014Chicago-area Alexian Brothers Health System and Adventist Midwest Health signed a non-binding letter of intent to form a joint operating company, a collaboration commonly referred to as a virtual merger. As Alexian brings five hospitals to the agreement and Adventist brings four, the health systems...
|Supreme Court Rules Compliance with FDA Labeling Guidelines Does Not Bar Lanham Act False Advertising Suits - POM Wonderful v. Coca-Cola Co.|
Bruce Colbath, Gregg Re; Sheppard Mullin Richter Hampton LLP;
July 2, 2014, previously published on June 19, 2014In a highly anticipated decision, the Supreme Court on June 12 announced that compliance with food labeling guidelines promulgated by the Food and Drug Administration will not operate as a bar against false advertising claims brought under the Lanham Act. In its decision, the Court made clear that...
|Beyond Truth, and Toward Repose: Price Increases Following “Merger to Monopoly” Do Not Rekindle Statute of Limitations|
Don T. Hibner; Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP;
June 30, 2014, previously published on June 19, 2014In February, 2007, Lubrizol Corporation made a “merger to monopoly” acquisition of the assets of a competitor. The acquisition established a monopoly in the market for petroleum wax-based oxidates. After the acquisition, Lubrizol increased prices for oxidates in March, July and...