Legal Articles: Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP

 







Document(s) published by this organization: 348


View Page: Prev  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next  >>
Show: results per page
Sort by:

HTMLNew Decision Clarifies Summary Judgment Standards for Off-the-Clock Claims
Thomas R. Kaufman; Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
May 26, 2014, previously published on May 21, 2014
On May 20, 2014, the First District Court of Appeal in Jong v. Kaiser Foundation Hospitals, issued a decision affirming the summary judgment granted as to one of the individual class representatives in a putative class action for overtime pay resulting from off-the-clock work. As explained below,...

 

HTMLFirst Circuit Affirms District Court’s Exclusion of Event Study as Unreliable Under Daubert
John M. Landry, John P. Stigi; Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
May 26, 2014, previously published on May 22, 2014
In Bricklayers & Trowel Trades Int’l Pension Fund v. Credit Suisse Sec. (USA) LLC , No. 12-1750, 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 8994 (1st Cir. May 14, 2014), the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit affirmed a district court’s exclusion of an event study as unreliable under...

 

HTMLThe Eleventh Circuit Interprets Prior Express Consent Under The TCPA
Mercedes A. Cook, Shannon Z. Petersen; Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
May 26, 2014, previously published on May 21, 2014
In Osorio v. State Farm Bank, F.S.B., No. 13-10951, 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 5709 (11th Cir. Mar. 28, 2014), the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit has provided some guidance on the parameters of “prior express consent” under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act...

 

HTMLOnce More Unto the Breach: the FCC Calls for Comments on Revamping Net Neutrality Regulations
Douglas A. "Drew" Svor, Brian D. Weimer, Paul A. Werner; Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
May 26, 2014, previously published on May 16, 2014
Following the D.C. Circuit’s decision in Verizon v. FCC, which struck down several key elements of the Federal Communication Commission’s 2010 Open Internet Order, the Commission yesterday released a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) that initiated a renewed effort to foster and...

 

HTML“They’re Here” - What You Need to Know Now About the Chilling New DoD Counterfeit Parts Rule ... and its NASA “Spinoff”
Alexander W. Major; Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
May 26, 2014, previously published on May 20, 2014
If you are a contractor that interacts with both the Department of Defense and “electronic parts,” it is time to grab the caffeinated beverage of your choice, crack open 79 FR 26,092, and begin the bone-tingling read that is sure to keep many supply chain managers up at night....

 

HTMLIn Michigan, CHE Trinity Health and Ascension Health Network come together in Together Health Network
Eric A. Klein, Rachel Landauer; Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
May 23, 2014, previously published on May 19, 2014
Competitors CHE Trinity Health Michigan and Ascension Health Michigan recently announced the Together Health Network, LLC—a separate and jointly owned, statewide, clinically integrated health network.

 

HTMLCSRC Issued New Drafts of Administrative Measures on Acquisition of Unlisted Public Companies for Public Comments
Xu Xiao; Sheppard Mullin Richter Hampton LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
May 23, 2014, previously published on May 14, 2014
China Securities Regulatory Commission (the “CSRC”) issued a notice on May 9, 2014 to seek public comments for the Administrative Measures on the Acquisition of Unlisted Public Companies (Draft for Comment) (hereinafter referred to as the “Acquisition Measures“).

 

HTMLDelaware Court of Chancery Underscores Heightened Pleading Standard Necessary to Support a Claim for Breach of Fiduciary Duty In Connection With a Merger
Alejandro E. Moreno, John P. Stigi; Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
May 23, 2014, previously published on May 12, 2014
In Houseman v. Sagerman, C.A. No. 8898-VCG, 2014 WL 1478511 (Del. Ch. Apr. 16, 2014), the Delaware Court of Chancery (Glasscock, V.C.) granted, in part, a motion to dismiss filed by certain directors and the financial advisor of Universata, Inc. (“Universata” or the...

 

HTMLCommingling and Personal Piggy Bank Leads to Summary Judgment on Veil Piercing Claims
Molly Masenga, Amanda Zablocki; Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
May 23, 2014, previously published on May 13, 2014
In Webmediabrands, Inc. v. Latinvision, Inc., No. 601048/2010, the Supreme Court (J. Friedman) pierced the corporate veil at the summary judgment stage.

 

HTMLPotential Risks of Healthcare Joint Ventures Between Insurance Companies and Hospitals
Charles L. Kreindler, Barbara E. Taylor; Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
May 23, 2014, previously published on May 21, 2014
Healthcare joint ventures are nothing new. Since the mid-2000’s, physician-hospital ventures have been resurgent, notwithstanding the Office of Inspector General’s skepticism regarding the risk of fraud and abuse when investors are sources of referrals and the filing of numerous...

 


View Page: Prev  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next  >>