Home > Legal Library > Advanced Search > Search Results









Join Matindale-Hubbell Connected



Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP Document Search Results (345)

 

View Page: Prev  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next  >>
Show: results per page
Sort by:
Sponsored Results

HTML“They’re Here” - What You Need to Know Now About the Chilling New DoD Counterfeit Parts Rule ... and its NASA “Spinoff”
Alexander W. Major; Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
May 26, 2014, previously published on May 20, 2014
If you are a contractor that interacts with both the Department of Defense and “electronic parts,” it is time to grab the caffeinated beverage of your choice, crack open 79 FR 26,092, and begin the bone-tingling read that is sure to keep many supply chain managers up at night....

 

HTMLThe Eleventh Circuit Interprets Prior Express Consent Under The TCPA
Mercedes A. Cook, Shannon Z. Petersen; Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
May 26, 2014, previously published on May 21, 2014
In Osorio v. State Farm Bank, F.S.B., No. 13-10951, 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 5709 (11th Cir. Mar. 28, 2014), the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit has provided some guidance on the parameters of “prior express consent” under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act...

 

HTMLNew Decision Clarifies Summary Judgment Standards for Off-the-Clock Claims
Thomas R. Kaufman; Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
May 26, 2014, previously published on May 21, 2014
On May 20, 2014, the First District Court of Appeal in Jong v. Kaiser Foundation Hospitals, issued a decision affirming the summary judgment granted as to one of the individual class representatives in a putative class action for overtime pay resulting from off-the-clock work. As explained below,...

 

HTMLThe FTC Continues Its Focus on the Mobile Arena
Gregory P. Barbee; Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
May 23, 2014, previously published on May 13, 2014
The Federal Trade Commission has recently focused its consumer protection efforts on the mobile arena, and particularly video game companies operating in that arena.

 

HTMLCommingling and Personal Piggy Bank Leads to Summary Judgment on Veil Piercing Claims
Molly Masenga, Amanda Zablocki; Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
May 23, 2014, previously published on May 13, 2014
In Webmediabrands, Inc. v. Latinvision, Inc., No. 601048/2010, the Supreme Court (J. Friedman) pierced the corporate veil at the summary judgment stage.

 

HTMLIn Michigan, CHE Trinity Health and Ascension Health Network come together in Together Health Network
Eric A. Klein, Rachel Landauer; Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
May 23, 2014, previously published on May 19, 2014
Competitors CHE Trinity Health Michigan and Ascension Health Michigan recently announced the Together Health Network, LLC—a separate and jointly owned, statewide, clinically integrated health network.

 

HTMLPotential Risks of Healthcare Joint Ventures Between Insurance Companies and Hospitals
Charles L. Kreindler, Barbara E. Taylor; Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
May 23, 2014, previously published on May 21, 2014
Healthcare joint ventures are nothing new. Since the mid-2000’s, physician-hospital ventures have been resurgent, notwithstanding the Office of Inspector General’s skepticism regarding the risk of fraud and abuse when investors are sources of referrals and the filing of numerous...

 

HTMLCSRC Issued New Drafts of Administrative Measures on Acquisition of Unlisted Public Companies for Public Comments
Xu Xiao; Sheppard Mullin Richter Hampton LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
May 23, 2014, previously published on May 14, 2014
China Securities Regulatory Commission (the “CSRC”) issued a notice on May 9, 2014 to seek public comments for the Administrative Measures on the Acquisition of Unlisted Public Companies (Draft for Comment) (hereinafter referred to as the “Acquisition Measures“).

 

HTMLDoes A Consumer’s Exercise of a Rescission Right Mean that the Loan Is Automatically Rescinded? Perhaps Not, According to One Federal Court, If the Consumer Does Not Also File a Lawsuit for Rescission
Sherwin F. Root, David H. Sands, Shoshana A. Zimmerman; Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
May 23, 2014, previously published on May 20, 2014
In Baker v. Bank of America, N.A., No. 5:13-CV-92-F, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9578 (E.D.N.C. Jan. 27, 2014), the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina held that even if a consumer timely exercises his or her right to rescind a loan transaction under the Truth in...

 

HTMLDelaware Court of Chancery Underscores Heightened Pleading Standard Necessary to Support a Claim for Breach of Fiduciary Duty In Connection With a Merger
Alejandro E. Moreno, John P. Stigi; Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
May 23, 2014, previously published on May 12, 2014
In Houseman v. Sagerman, C.A. No. 8898-VCG, 2014 WL 1478511 (Del. Ch. Apr. 16, 2014), the Delaware Court of Chancery (Glasscock, V.C.) granted, in part, a motion to dismiss filed by certain directors and the financial advisor of Universata, Inc. (“Universata” or the...

 


View Page: Prev  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next  >>