Shulman, Rogers, Gandal, Pordy & Ecker, P.A.

 – Firm Profile
 




Shulman, Rogers, Gandal, <br />Pordy & Ecker, P.A. Law Firm Logo

Shulman, Rogers, Gandal,
Pordy & Ecker, P.A.
 

Size of Organization: 92
Year Established: 1972
Main Office: Potomac, Maryland
Web Site: http://www.shulmanrogers.com

Telephone: 301-230-5200
Telecopier: 301-230-2891



Profile Visibility
#366 in weekly profile views out of 280,991 total law firms Overall

Icon for Featured Peer Review Rated LawyerIcon for Featured Peer Review Rated Lawyer at this firm


General Practice including Trial and Administrative practice before U.S. Courts and State Courts, Government Departments, Commissions and Federal Agencies.



Martindale-Hubbell has augmented a firm's provided information with third-party sourced data to present a more comprehensive overview of the firm's expertise:
U.S. Federal Litigation Activity
Source: U.S. Federal Civil District Court Databases. Powered by LexisNexis atVantage

Highest number of cases by Shulman, Rogers, Gandal,
Pordy & Ecker, P.A.:
Contracts (14 cases in past two years)
Peer Review Ratings

Total number of Peer Review Rated lawyers of Shulman, Rogers, Gandal,
Pordy & Ecker, P.A.: 39


Documents by Shulman, Rogers, Gandal,
Pordy & Ecker, P.A. on Martindale.com

Subscribe to this feed

Strategic Considerations in Acquisitions by Government Contractors of Non-Contractor Companies
Roger A. Klein,David B. Robbins, April 21, 2015
Generally, government contractors have a clear understanding of the primary transactional issues when acquiring other contractors. However, insufficient attention is often given to the special risks present when contractors acquire commercial or international entities. Due diligence applied in...

FINRA and U4 Reporting: Do You Have A Target On Your Back?
Emily P. Gordy,Renee Kramer, April 14, 2015
FINRA member firms will soon face obligations set forth in FINRA Rule 3110(e), which takes effect on July 1, 2015 and requires that firms verify the accuracy and completeness of the information contained in an applicant's Form U4. The amended rule also requires that firms adopt written procedures...

Prince George’s County “Bans the Box”
Sandy David Baron,Meredith S. Campbell,Joy C. Einstein,Gregory D. Grant,Michael L. Kabik, April 14, 2015
Following on the heels of Montgomery County and the District of Columbia, Prince George’s County is the latest local jurisdiction to “ban the box.” The Prince George’s County law prohibits private employers from making inquiries about an applicant’s criminal record on...






 

Complete a Client Review


Have you recently worked with this firm? Share your experience as a Client of this firm and complete a Client Review to help others make an informed choice when hiring legal counsel.
 
 

Compare this Firm

Compare this firm to other firms in your Favorites.
 

Add to Favorites

As a registered user of martindale.com Connected, you can add law firms to your list of Favorites. You can securely add comments and compare the law firms in your Favorites.