Smith, Currie & Hancock LLP

 – Firm Profile
 




Smith, Currie & Hancock LLP Law Firm Logo

Smith, Currie & Hancock LLP 

Size of Organization: 62
Year Established: 1965
Main Office: Atlanta, Georgia
Web Site: http://www.smithcurrie.com

Telephone: 404-521-3800
Facsimile: 404-688-0671

Profile Visibility
#127 in weekly profile views out of 283,013 total law firms Overall

Icon for Featured Peer Review Rated LawyerIcon for Featured Peer Review Rated Lawyer at this firm


100_Anniversary_Badge
100_Anniversary_Badge
Construction LawEnvironmental Law
Government Contracts
 
               Learn More

 

The firm was established in 1965 and is one of the largest law firms in the United States concentrating in Construction Law and Government Contracts, as well as handling Commercial matters, Litigation, Arbitration and Mediation. Clients include multinational and Fortune 500 Companies and Trade Associations.



Martindale-Hubbell has augmented a firm's provided information with third-party sourced data to present a more comprehensive overview of the firm's expertise:
U.S. Federal Litigation Activity
Source: U.S. Federal Civil District Court Databases. Powered by LexisNexis atVantage

Highest number of cases by Smith, Currie & Hancock LLP:
Contracts (25 cases in past two years)
Peer Review Ratings

Total number of Peer Review Rated lawyers of Smith, Currie & Hancock LLP: 26


Documents by Smith, Currie & Hancock LLP on Martindale.com

Subscribe to this feed

Florida Reaffirms "Consumer Expectations" Test in Design Defect Products Liability Cases
Eugene Polyak, January 8, 2016
In Aubin v. Union Carbide Corp., 40 Fla. L. Weekly S596 (Fla. Oct. 29, 2015), the Florida Supreme Court recently resolved an important conflict between Florida's intermediate appellate courts with respect to the test used in adjudicating design-defect claims in product liability cases.

Does an "Unrealistically Low" Price For a Fixed Price Contract Permit an Agency to Simply Eliminate a Proposal from Competition?
Alan I. Saltman, January 5, 2016
The Court of Federal Claims just issued a significant opinion in KWR Construction Inc. v. United States, regarding an agency's rejection of a proposal on the basis that the offeror's price was unrealistically low. The procurement was for a multiple-award construction contract and was set aside for...

Special Considerations for Subcontractors and Suppliers on P3 Projects
Todd M. Heffner, December 8, 2015
Public Private Partnerships, or P3s, are aptly named because they truly mix aspects of public and private construction. But does that mean they are like public projects and subject to state or federal bonding requirement and prompt payment obligations? Or are they like private projects with lien...






 

Complete a Client Review


Have you recently worked with this firm? Share your experience as a Client of this firm and complete a Client Review to help others make an informed choice when hiring legal counsel.
 
 

Compare this Firm

Compare this firm to other firms in your Favorites.
 

Add to Favorites

As a registered user of martindale.com Connected, you can add law firms to your list of Favorites. You can securely add comments and compare the law firms in your Favorites.