Smith, Currie & Hancock LLP

 – Firm Profile

Smith, Currie & Hancock LLP Law Firm Logo

Smith, Currie & Hancock LLP 

Size of Organization: 62
Year Established: 1965
Main Office: Atlanta, Georgia
Web Site:

Telephone: 404-521-3800
Facsimile: 404-688-0671

Profile Visibility
#313 in weekly profile views out of 279,115 total law firms Overall

Icon for Featured Peer Review Rated LawyerIcon for Featured Peer Review Rated Lawyer at this firm

Construction LawEnvironmental Law
Government Contracts
               Learn More


The firm was established in 1965 and is one of the largest law firms in the United States concentrating in Construction Law and Government Contracts, as well as handling Commercial matters, Litigation, Arbitration and Mediation. Clients include multinational and Fortune 500 Companies and Trade Associations.

Martindale-Hubbell has augmented a firm's provided information with third-party sourced data to present a more comprehensive overview of the firm's expertise:
U.S. Federal Litigation Activity
Source: U.S. Federal Civil District Court Databases. Powered by LexisNexis atVantage

Highest number of cases by Smith, Currie & Hancock LLP:
Contracts (25 cases in past two years)
Peer Review Ratings

Total number of Peer Review Rated lawyers of Smith, Currie & Hancock LLP: 29

Documents by Smith, Currie & Hancock LLP on

Subscribe to this feed

Empower Your Arbitrator to Allocate or Award Attorneys' Fees
Eugene J. Heady, April 11, 2014
Claims and disputes involving construction projects tend to be technically complex and factually intensive. As a result, the resolution of construction claims and disputes can be time consuming and costly. In prosecuting or defending claims, one question that always arises is “Can I recover...

False Claims Act - Retaliatory Discharge Claims
Lochlin B. Samples, April 1, 2014
Recently, the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi issued a detailed ruling dismissing an employee’s retaliatory discharge claim under the Federal False Claims Act (“FCA”). See McCollum v. Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc., No. 3:13-cv-866, 2014 WL...

Fee Allocation in the Schedule of Values
Harry Rippeon, April 1, 2014
When contractors prepare their budget for a project, they often allocate costs among various line items. This allocation typically takes the form of a schedule of values (“SOV”), which is often presented to the owner (or general contractor, in the case of a subcontractor) for approval...


Complete a Client Review

Have you recently worked with this firm? Share your experience as a Client of this firm and complete a Client Review to help others make an informed choice when hiring legal counsel.

Compare this Firm

Compare this firm to other firms in your Favorites.

Add to Favorites

As a registered user of Connected, you can add law firms to your list of Favorites. You can securely add comments and compare the law firms in your Favorites.