Home > Staas Halsey > Overview


Staas & Halsey LLP

 – Firm Profile
 




Staas & Halsey LLP Law Firm Logo

Staas & Halsey LLP 

Size of Organization: 33
Year Established: 1971
Web Site: http://www.staasandhalsey.com

Telephone: 202-434-1500
Facsimile: 202-434-1501



Profile Visibility
#897 in weekly profile views out of 281,522 total law firms Overall

Icon for Featured Peer Review Rated LawyerIcon for Featured Peer Review Rated Lawyer at this firm


Since 1971, the law firm of Staas & Halsey LLP has assisted clients from every major nation in the world in protecting their intellectual and industrial property rights. We have represented clients in the courts of the United States, before various U.S. government agencies, and in arbitration hearings. By emphasizing innovative yet practical solutions, we provide our clients with efficient, personalized service. We are qualified to assist clients in technology-related matters, since every attorney in the firm has experience and expertise in a range of technical areas.



Martindale-Hubbell has augmented a firm's provided information with third-party sourced data to present a more comprehensive overview of the firm's expertise:
U.S. Patent Activity
Source: U.S. Patent Trade Office. Powered by LexisNexis atVantage

Total number of U.S. granted patents by Staas & Halsey LLP:
2289 (in past two years)
Peer Review Ratings

Total number of Peer Review Rated lawyers of Staas & Halsey LLP: 6


Documents by Staas & Halsey LLP on Martindale.com

Subscribe to this feed

En Banc Federal Circuit Review of ITC Exclusion Order Based on Induced Infringement in Suprema v. International Trade Commission
June 26, 2015
On May 13, 2015, the en banc United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (“Federal Circuit”) sat to determine whether the ITC can rely on 35 U.S.C. 271(b) to support an exclusion order. The technology at issue relates to biometrics, specifically fingerprint scanners. Cross...

Federal Circuit Clarifies that Service Mark “Use in Commerce” RequiresMore Than Mere Advertising in Couture v. Playdom, Inc.
June 26, 2015
On March 2, 2015, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (“Federal Circuit”) affirmed the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) Trademark Trial and Appeal Board’s (“TTAB”) decision to cancel David Couture’s (“Couture”)...

Federal Circuit Says the Issue of Patentable Subject Matter Can Quickly Be Decided on Motion to Dismiss in Ultramercial, Inc. v. Hulu, LLC.
June 26, 2015
On November 14, 2014, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (“Federal Circuit”) affirmed the decision of the United States District Court for Central District of California (“District Court”) in favor of Hulu, LLC. (“Hulu”), noting that the District...






 

Complete a Client Review


Have you recently worked with this firm? Share your experience as a Client of this firm and complete a Client Review to help others make an informed choice when hiring legal counsel.
 
 

Compare this Firm

Compare this firm to other firms in your Favorites.
 

Add to Favorites

As a registered user of martindale.com Connected, you can add law firms to your list of Favorites. You can securely add comments and compare the law firms in your Favorites.