Practice Areas & Industries: Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP

 




Business Development Companies Return to Practice Areas & Industries

Group Profile Lawyers in this Group Offices Locations for this Group
 

Practice/Industry Group Overview

Sutherland is the nation’s preeminent leader in all aspects of BDCs—a significant financing source for the growth of private U.S. businesses.

Sutherland has represented business development companies (BDCs) for almost two decades, advising clients in all phases of business and regulation. BDCs—publicly held investment funds that invest primarily in private and thinly traded public U.S. businesses—have emerged as a growing source of capital for a sector of the U.S. economy historically underserved by traditional financing providers. Our work for BDCs covers their Investment Company Act of 1940 (1940 Act) obligations, Securities Act of 1933 registration, Securities Exchange Act of 1934 reporting requirements, Investment Advisers Act of 1940 registration and reporting obligations, and all aspects of public and private securities offerings.

Sutherland advises BDC clients in structuring and organization, operations, compliance and capital formation, including public and private debt and equity offerings, rights offerings, and convertible debt for both externally and internally managed BDCs. We’ve been involved in a majority of all the initial public offerings in the industry and consistently work with more BDCs than any other firm in the country. Our team blazed the trail for our clients with the use of the shelf registration statement for follow-on issuances. We counsel BDC boards of directors in all aspects of public company operations such as board-level corporate governance, listing obligations imposed by the national exchanges and strategic planning. Sutherland also has extensive experience representing BDCs in portfolio company-level transactions in compliance with unique BDC rules. For example, we advise clients regarding limitations imposed on BDCs under the 1940 Act with respect to ownership of registered investment advisers and broker-dealers, as well as the treatment of financing vehicles for purposes of asset coverage tests.

Recently BDCs expanded the menu of capital raising options, and Sutherland understands all the new financing tools. We have managed all regulatory and corporate aspects of acquisitions and dispositions of majority-owned affiliates, pools of assets, and lines of business, as well as mergers, exchanges and other strategic transactions with BDCs for both issuers and underwriters. We also work with privately owned Small Business Investment Companies (SBICs), advising on formation, structure and operation; guiding clients through the licensing process and developing compliance systems. Our depth of experience makes us uniquely qualified to advise BDCs looking to form SBICs or to counsel SBICs in their efforts to convert to BDCs.

Why Sutherland
In at the beginning. We have been active in this market for almost two decades and have been involved with every aspect of BDC formation, operation, compliance and ongoing capital raising. We have been advisers in nearly every M&A transaction in the BDC industry since 1994. We have deep relationships with the service providers who are critical to the industry, including underwriters, bankers and valuation consultants.

Unrivaled record. Sutherland has advised BDCs through practically all aspects of corporate and portfolio company acquisitions, divestitures and roll-ups. We also advise our clients on every aspect of traditional corporate governance and operational matters including disclosure, proxy contests, compliance exams, bank custody matters, conflicts of interest, corporate policy development and implementation, and internal controls design and implementation.

Dominance. We have achieved critical mass in the BDC sector, with past successes breeding future strength. We have the largest, deepest BDC legal team in the nation, and we work with more BDCs than any other firm. In 2012 alone, the BDC industry registered or raised more than $12 billion in capital, and we were involved in more than $8 billion of that total.

Trendsetting. We have been instrumental in developing the non-traded BDC and the non-listed BDC structures, and interpretations of the regulations around them. Sutherland has strong working relationships with trade organizations that advise regulators. We have also obtained precedent-setting exemptive relief from the SEC for BDCs.

We understand the BDC/SBIC relationship. We have unparalleled experience with BDCs seeking SBIC licenses. The depth of our knowledge in both areas also makes us uniquely qualified to advise BDCs looking to form or invest in SBICs or to counsel SBICs as they convert to BDCs.

Leadership. Sutherland has organized and hosted the Annual BDC Roundtable conference event since 2002 to provide a forum for BDC executives to discuss current events and issues facing BDCs. Sutherland attorneys are joined by leading staff members from the SEC’s Division of Investment Management, senior management from BDCs, financial and investment banking firms and other service providers to the industry. We update the industry through regular conference calls, and our attorneys are highly sought after as speakers and panelists at other industry events.

Nuts and Bolts
Sutherland provides the comprehensive suite of services necessary for the formation, operation, and growth of BDCs, including:

  • Fund formation
  • Regulatory and compliance
  • Debt and equity offerings
  • Corporate governance
  • Mergers and acquisitions
  • Reorganizations
  • Portfolio transactions
  • Credit facilities
  • Tax
  • Strategic alliances
  • Formation and contractual arrangements with registered investment advisers
  • Executive compensation
  • Intellectual property

Take Action
Business development companies are unique investment funds. Sutherland has the most BDC lawyers and largest BDC client base of any law firm in the country and has been active in every BDC merger since 1994. Private businesses need experience and connections when it comes to raising capital.

Selected Experience
Sutherland advises Stellus Capital Investment Corporation in initial public offering.
From fund formation, to registration with the Securities and Exchange Commission, to working with the underwriters to launch and complete the initial public offering, Sutherland attorneys worked with Stellus management through very uncertain market conditions to complete this $120 million transaction.

Sutherland counsels Allied Capital throughout its merger with Ares Capital.
In 2009, Allied Capital Corporation and Ares Capital Corporation—both BDCs—entered into a merger agreement, with Ares acquiring Allied. Sutherland advised Allied Capital on every aspect of the transaction, which closed in April 2010.

Sutherland represents Goldman Sachs & Co., Wells Fargo Securities and Morgan Stanley in connection with New Mountain Finance Corp.'s $100 million IPO.
Sutherland advised as underwriters' counsel for a business development company, New Mountain Finance Corporation, in connection with its IPO. The offering raising approximately $130 million in total gross proceeds including proceeds from a concurrent private placement.


 
 
Articles Authored by Lawyers at this office:

New CFTC Rules Provide Broad Enhancement of Protections for Customers of FCMs - But at a Cost
, November 15, 2013
On October 30, 2013, in a 3-1 vote, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC or the Commission) approved final rules that significantly strengthen the protections afforded to customers of futures commission merchants (FCMs). “Enhancing Protections Afforded Customers and Customer Funds...

Georgia Supreme Court Declines to Review Decision Regarding Limitation-of-Liability Clauses in Customer Contracts
, November 08, 2013
This week, the Georgia Supreme Court denied a request to review a divided Georgia Court of Appeals decision with potentially far-reaching consequences for companies that do business in Georgia and rely on limitation-of-liability clauses in their customer contracts. Monitronics International v....

California Strengthens Data Privacy and Breach Notification Laws
, October 15, 2013
At the end of September, California passed two new amendments to existing data privacy laws aimed to protect California consumers. The first focuses on the collection of personal information and requires companies engaged in such practices to disclose whether they honor web browser “do not...

New TCPA Rules Take Effect for Telemarketing Calls
Wilson G. Barmeyer,Thomas M. Byrne,Lewis S. Wiener, October 15, 2013
Significant regulatory changes are taking effect under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) on October 16, 2013, due to a revision of the Federal Communications Commission’s (FCC) TCPA rule. The amended rule will now require that consent be in writing for autodialed or prerecorded...

PCAOB Offers Guidance for Accounting Firms and Accountants Preparing Written Statements of Position
Samuel J. Casey,Patricia A. Gorham,Kurt Lentz,Amelia Toy Rudolph, September 26, 2013
On September 19 and 20, 2013, the American Law Institute presented its annual course, Accountants’ Liability: Managing Risks in a Changing Environment. One highlight of the conference was a Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) panel presentation featuring Claudius B. Modesti,...

An Ode to the Actuaries: Tax Court Concludes that Acuity’s Loss Reserves Were “Fair and Reasonable”
, September 12, 2013
On September 4, the United States Tax Court issued its opinion in Acuity v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2013-209. In brief, the court concluded that Acuity’s reserves for unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses for 2006, as used by the company in computing “losses incurred”...

After Four Years of Increased Activity, FINRA’s Sanctions Are Dropping in 2013
Andrew M. McCormick,Brian L. Rubin, September 10, 2013
Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) 2013 fines and disciplinary actions are on track to fall well short of 2012’s totals. During the first half of 2013, FINRA reported $23 million of fines in its monthly Disciplinary and Other FINRA Actions publications. In contrast, during the...

New Final Regs on Use of Differential Income Stream in Evaluating Cost-Sharing Arrangements
, September 04, 2013
On August 26, 2013, the United States Treasury Department issued new final regulations under Internal Revenue Code (IRC) Section 482. The new regulations provide guidance on the “income method” for determining taxable income in connection with cost-sharing arrangements (CSAs) entered...

Litigation Update on 14 Patronage Capital Cases in Eight States
Benjamin C. Morgan,James A. Orr, August 29, 2013
Since 2009, at least 14 cases have been filed against electric cooperatives over patronage capital (or capital credits) in eight states: Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Missouri, New Mexico, North Carolina, South Carolina, and Texas. Sutherland has previously issued Legal Alerts regarding these...

CFTC Issues Highly Anticipated Harmonization Rules
, August 15, 2013
Today, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) provided long-awaited clarification and relief to investment advisers that are registered with the CFTC as commodity pool operators (CPOs) and/or commodity trading advisors (CTAs). The CFTC issued final rules to harmonize certain compliance...

An End-User’s Guide to the CFTC’s Final Cross-Border Guidance
, August 09, 2013
Last month, the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) issued final interpretive guidance with respect to the cross-border application of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act’s (Dodd-Frank Act) requirements for swaps (Final Guidance). This Legal Alert...

Ready or Not: Lost Securityholders, Uncashed Checks and Dormant Accounts
, August 09, 2013
In the dog days of August, it would be tempting to put aside challenges created by new Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) rules. But we all know that would be a mistake. Instead, attention needs to be paid now to new rules requiring searches for lost securityholders and persons holding...

Georgia Court of Appeals: Fine Print Too Small to Save Limitation-of-Liability Clause in Home Security Contract
, August 01, 2013
A decision by the Georgia Court of Appeals has potentially far-reaching consequences for companies that include limitation-of-liability clauses in their customer contracts. In Monitronics International v. Veasley, the Georgia Court of Appeals upheld a $9 million jury verdict against an alarm...