Practice Areas & Industries: Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP

 





Group Profile Lawyers in this Group Offices Locations for this Group
 

Practice/Industry Group Overview

Sutherland attorneys focus on resolving critical crisis management issues so clients can focus on running the business.

Companies and executives rely on Sutherland’s Crisis Management team to mobilize quickly and deliver the business insight, industry knowledge and complex litigation skill to navigate crises and develop legal response strategies. A major crisis can wreak havoc on a company’s image, employee morale, customer and vendor relationships and stock price, creating lasting consequences. Through Twitter and other social media outlets, news of a crisis can spread like wildfire—well before a company can determine exactly what transpired and craft an appropriate response.

Sutherland advises and defends clients facing challenges on a variety of legal fronts, including parallel civil litigation and criminal investigations, multidistrict proceedings, putative class actions, congressional investigations and hearings, regulatory investigations, internal investigations, shareholder direct and derivative claims and corporate disclosure issues. We often serve as the client’s primary counsel and participate in every aspect of the response, including corporate disclosure, media management, investor relations, board communications, litigation and regulatory investigations.

By partnering with our Crisis Management team, clients are able to remain focused on their day-to-day business objectives while Sutherland attorneys develop and, if necessary, help deliver a coordinated response. We mobilize quickly–across practice areas and office locations–and deliver the industry experience and legal skills needed to address the issues at hand.

Why Sutherland
Minimizing client risks. Sutherland works with internal and external communications consultants to craft responses that minimize legal risk and promote consistency and compliance with regulatory disclosure requirements.

Around-the-clock access. Sutherland partners are available 24/7 to develop and deliver comprehensive legal oversight and consistent messaging throughout the crisis.

Data collection and e-discovery expertise. Faced with complex legal issues, hundreds of witnesses and short deadlines, Sutherland executes responses that range from data production, review and privilege analyses to witness kit preparation.

Litigation expertise. Sutherland litigators are known for successfully and efficiently resolving litigation and arbitration for clients in a variety of industries.

Crisis preparation. Sutherland develops crisis response plans that include periodic audits and drills to evaluate the plan’s effectiveness and internal/external team responsiveness.

Nuts and Bolts

  • Team approach

Sutherland’s multidisciplinary approach to crisis management brings  together attorneys from numerous practice teams and office locations  who offer the industry experience and legal skills required to  address  clients’ needs.

  • Preparation

Effective crisis management requires thoughtful preparation. Partners on  our Crisis Management team leverage their industry, government and  litigation experience to develop crisis management plans that specifically  address a client’s anticipated risks.

  • Business insight

The Sutherland team includes many attorneys with industry and business  experience. We are adept at balancing a client’s mid- and long-term goals  with the immediate needs of in-house counsel and management, such as  maintaining accurate corporate disclosures and consistent public  statements, avoiding inappropriate corporate admissions, identifying and  retaining relevant data, and anticipating future claims.

  • Seasoned litigators

Clients rely on Sutherland when faced with high exposure disputes on a national stage. Our deep understanding of our clients’ business is applied to address the current crisis and deliver recommendations to avoid future risks. Sutherland’s experience with multiforum litigation, class actions and federal and state multidistrict litigation involving hundreds of litigants and defendants allows our clients to focus on their business objectives while we effectively manage these complex matters to resolution.

  • Disclosure and communications

Together with our clients, Sutherland develops and executes strategies for  responding to all types of demand for information—from  shareholders, rating agencies, auditors, federal and state agencies,  opposing counsel in high-stakes litigation, or any other group.

  • Data collection, review and e-discovery

Sutherland’s Crisis Management team has created and trained a unique  and experienced data review and e-discovery team. The team includes  senior staff attorneys, staff attorneys, and more than 50 long-term contract  attorneys dedicated to data identification, effective document assessment  and production projects. The attorneys are experienced at working  together to handle high-pressure, high-stakes situations, and effectively  use advanced technology to identify, preserve and assess documents  and data.

Take Action
In today’s 24/7 media environment, it’s more important than ever that a company be prepared to respond to an internal or external crisis. Sutherland’s Crisis Management team—comprised of partners with experience that ranges from litigation and regulatory compliance to internal investigations and electronic data collection—is uniquely qualified to not only help clients identify and mitigate potential risks in advance, but also craft and manage their response if and when the unthinkable occurs.

Selected Experience
Sutherland defends international drilling contractor in all matters arising from the 2010 Gulf of Mexico oil spill.
Within hours of the 2010 incident at the Macondo well in the Gulf of Mexico, our client, the owner of the drill rig, was inundated with inquiries. Sutherland attorneys worked with the company’s communications consultant to respond to media inquiries, guided the client through congressional inquiries and testified on the client’s behalf during congressional hearings. Sutherland’s data collection, review and production team managed more than 70 million pages of data to complete more than 50 sets of document requests from litigants and government agencies, including the U.S. Chemical Safety Board, the National Academy of Engineering, congressional committees, and the President’s oil spill commission. 

Sutherland assists privately held manufacturing company in antitrust claims alleging collusion with principal competitor to allocate customers.
Following a dawn FBI search it soon became evident that: the client was facing a coordinated investigation in the United States and Canada; its competitor was cooperating with the government and the crisis threatened the company’s financial viability as well as its long-term customer relationships. Sutherland immediately assisted on compliance issues during the search and represented the company throughout the investigations. This included working with the client and a PR firm to address business fallout and to preserve customer relationships by notifying potentially affected customers prior to the entry of a guilty plea. Sutherland ultimately negotiated individual settlements with most key customers.

Sutherland counsels publicly held, multinational industrial giant.
Six weeks prior to the scheduled release of year-end earnings, the multinational company’s auditors flagged multiple instances of revenue recognition irregularities affecting subsidiary and parent company financials and in turn, the company’s operations. A Sutherland rapid response team investigated, determined individual responsibility, addressed accounting and internal control issues and quantified the impact of problematic transactions to the satisfaction of the auditors. The company’s financial statements were released on schedule.


 
 
Articles Authored by Lawyers at this office:

New CFTC Rules Provide Broad Enhancement of Protections for Customers of FCMs - But at a Cost
, November 15, 2013
On October 30, 2013, in a 3-1 vote, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC or the Commission) approved final rules that significantly strengthen the protections afforded to customers of futures commission merchants (FCMs). “Enhancing Protections Afforded Customers and Customer Funds...

Georgia Supreme Court Declines to Review Decision Regarding Limitation-of-Liability Clauses in Customer Contracts
, November 08, 2013
This week, the Georgia Supreme Court denied a request to review a divided Georgia Court of Appeals decision with potentially far-reaching consequences for companies that do business in Georgia and rely on limitation-of-liability clauses in their customer contracts. Monitronics International v....

California Strengthens Data Privacy and Breach Notification Laws
, October 15, 2013
At the end of September, California passed two new amendments to existing data privacy laws aimed to protect California consumers. The first focuses on the collection of personal information and requires companies engaged in such practices to disclose whether they honor web browser “do not...

New TCPA Rules Take Effect for Telemarketing Calls
Wilson G. Barmeyer,Thomas M. Byrne,Lewis S. Wiener, October 15, 2013
Significant regulatory changes are taking effect under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) on October 16, 2013, due to a revision of the Federal Communications Commission’s (FCC) TCPA rule. The amended rule will now require that consent be in writing for autodialed or prerecorded...

PCAOB Offers Guidance for Accounting Firms and Accountants Preparing Written Statements of Position
Samuel J. Casey,Patricia A. Gorham,Kurt Lentz,Amelia Toy Rudolph, September 26, 2013
On September 19 and 20, 2013, the American Law Institute presented its annual course, Accountants’ Liability: Managing Risks in a Changing Environment. One highlight of the conference was a Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) panel presentation featuring Claudius B. Modesti,...

An Ode to the Actuaries: Tax Court Concludes that Acuity’s Loss Reserves Were “Fair and Reasonable”
, September 12, 2013
On September 4, the United States Tax Court issued its opinion in Acuity v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2013-209. In brief, the court concluded that Acuity’s reserves for unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses for 2006, as used by the company in computing “losses incurred”...

After Four Years of Increased Activity, FINRA’s Sanctions Are Dropping in 2013
Andrew M. McCormick,Brian L. Rubin, September 10, 2013
Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) 2013 fines and disciplinary actions are on track to fall well short of 2012’s totals. During the first half of 2013, FINRA reported $23 million of fines in its monthly Disciplinary and Other FINRA Actions publications. In contrast, during the...

New Final Regs on Use of Differential Income Stream in Evaluating Cost-Sharing Arrangements
, September 04, 2013
On August 26, 2013, the United States Treasury Department issued new final regulations under Internal Revenue Code (IRC) Section 482. The new regulations provide guidance on the “income method” for determining taxable income in connection with cost-sharing arrangements (CSAs) entered...

Litigation Update on 14 Patronage Capital Cases in Eight States
Benjamin C. Morgan,James A. Orr, August 29, 2013
Since 2009, at least 14 cases have been filed against electric cooperatives over patronage capital (or capital credits) in eight states: Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Missouri, New Mexico, North Carolina, South Carolina, and Texas. Sutherland has previously issued Legal Alerts regarding these...

CFTC Issues Highly Anticipated Harmonization Rules
, August 15, 2013
Today, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) provided long-awaited clarification and relief to investment advisers that are registered with the CFTC as commodity pool operators (CPOs) and/or commodity trading advisors (CTAs). The CFTC issued final rules to harmonize certain compliance...

An End-User’s Guide to the CFTC’s Final Cross-Border Guidance
, August 09, 2013
Last month, the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) issued final interpretive guidance with respect to the cross-border application of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act’s (Dodd-Frank Act) requirements for swaps (Final Guidance). This Legal Alert...

Ready or Not: Lost Securityholders, Uncashed Checks and Dormant Accounts
, August 09, 2013
In the dog days of August, it would be tempting to put aside challenges created by new Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) rules. But we all know that would be a mistake. Instead, attention needs to be paid now to new rules requiring searches for lost securityholders and persons holding...

Georgia Court of Appeals: Fine Print Too Small to Save Limitation-of-Liability Clause in Home Security Contract
, August 01, 2013
A decision by the Georgia Court of Appeals has potentially far-reaching consequences for companies that include limitation-of-liability clauses in their customer contracts. In Monitronics International v. Veasley, the Georgia Court of Appeals upheld a $9 million jury verdict against an alarm...