Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP

 – Firm Profile
 




Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP Law Firm Logo

Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP 

Size of Organization: 320
Year Established: 1885
Main Office: Cincinnati, Ohio
Web Site: http://www.taftlaw.com

Telephone: 513-381-2838
Facsimile: 513-381-0205

Profile Visibility
#55 in weekly profile views out of 279,924 total law firms Overall

Icon for Featured Peer Review Rated LawyerIcon for Featured Peer Review Rated Lawyer at this firm


General Practice
 
               Learn More

 



Martindale-Hubbell has augmented a firm's provided information with third-party sourced data to present a more comprehensive overview of the firm's expertise:
U.S. Federal Litigation Activity
Source: U.S. Federal Civil District Court Databases. Powered by LexisNexis atVantage

Highest number of cases by Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP:
Labor and Employment (77 cases in past two years)
U.S. Patent Activity
Source: U.S. Patent Trade Office. Powered by LexisNexis atVantage

Total number of U.S. granted patents by Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP:
41 (in past two years)
Peer Review Ratings

Total number of Peer Review Rated lawyers of Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP: 204


Documents by Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP on Martindale.com

Subscribe to this feed

HHS OIG Issues Proposed Rule to Create New Safe Harbors and Exceptions Concerning Beneficiary Access to Care, Gainsharing
Gregory W. Bee, October 9, 2014
On Oct. 3, 2014, the Office of Inspector General (“OIG”) of the Department of Health and Human Services published a proposed rule (the “Proposed Rule”) that would modify certain safe harbors, and add other new ones, under the anti-kickback statute (“AKS”) and...

Industry Standards and OSHA Redefining VSSR Regulations
Nicholas E. Davis,Lawrence C. Davison,Samuel M. Duran,Christopher B. Ermisch,Cynthia C. Felson, October 9, 2014
The Ohio Supreme Court recently held that industry standards and OSHA laws may be considered by the Industrial Commission in the interpretation of VSSR (Violation of a Specific Safety Requirement) regulations. In State ex rel. Richmond v. Indus. Comm., Slip Opinion No. 2014-Ohio-1604, the claimant...

Subcontractors Beware: An Agreement to Sponsor an Appeal May No Longer Be Enough
October 9, 2014
The Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals’ (“ASBCA”) jurisdiction is limited by law to prime contractors. For the ASBCA to exercise jurisdiction over a subcontractor’s claim, a subcontractor’s appeal must be sponsored by the party in privity with the United States...






 

Complete a Client Review


Have you recently worked with this firm? Share your experience as a Client of this firm and complete a Client Review to help others make an informed choice when hiring legal counsel.
 
 

Compare this Firm

Compare this firm to other firms in your Favorites.
 

Add to Favorites

As a registered user of martindale.com Connected, you can add law firms to your list of Favorites. You can securely add comments and compare the law firms in your Favorites.