Customer Support: 800-526-4902
 

Thomas A. Isaacson: Lawyer with Covington & Burling LLP

Thomas A. Isaacson

LinkedIn
Of Counsel
Washington,  DC  U.S.A.
Phone202-662-6000

Peer Rating
N/R
 N/R

Client Rating

Printer Friendly VersionEmail this PageDownload to My Outlook ContactsAdd lawyer to My FavoritesCompare this lawyer to other lawyers in your favorites

Experience & Credentials
 

Practice Areas

  • Antitrust & Consumer Law
  • Antitrust Litigation
  • Class Actions
  • Litigation
 
Contact InfoTelephone: 202-662-6000
Fax: 202-662-6291
http://www.cov.com/tisaacson/
 
University Dartmouth College, A.B., cum laude, 1980
 
Law SchoolUniversity of Pennsylvania Law School, J.D., 1983
 
Admitted1984, District of Columbia
 
Born1958
 
Biography

Thomas Isaacson is of counsel in the firm's Washington, DC office and focuses on a wide range of commercial litigation and antitrust class actions. He has been involved in a wide range of civil litigation in more than a dozen federal district courts and numerous appellate courts, state and federal administrative agencies and alternative dispute resolution forums. The bulk of that work has involved antitrust litigation, and another significant portion has involved antitrust counseling and obtaining government clearance of dozens of mergers and acquisitions.

Representative Matters

· Louisiana Whole Drug Co. v. Schering-Plough Corp. Represents Schering-Plough Corporation in an ongoing antitrust action in which dozens of named plaintiffs, including two putative classes of direct and indirect purchasers of Schering's K-Dur pharmaceutical, allege that Schering conspired to exclude generic competition.

· In re Digital Music Antitrust Litigation. Represents Bertelsmann Inc. in an ongoing antitrust action brought by a putative class of consumer purchasers alleging that the major record labels conspired to fix the price of Internet music and prop up the market for compact disks.

· Wheeler v. Pilgrim's Pride Corporation. Represented Tyson Foods, Inc. in an antitrust action brought by a putative class of chicken growers who alleged that the two major chicken integrators conspired to depress the price paid to chicken growers. Relying on Tyson's arguments, made by Mr. Isaacson, the court denied class certification and the Fifth Circuit denied plaintiffs' appeal.

· GTE New Media Services, Inc. v. Ameritech Corp., et al. Represented a major Internet company in a challenge to the RBOCs' exclusion of competition from key websites. Mr. Isaacson argued the case in the D.C. Circuit-the first appellate decision involving personal jurisdiction over an Internet business in the antitrust context.

· Rivendell Forest Products Ltd. v. Canadian Forest Products, Ltd. Represented Canadian lumber manufacturer defendants in an antitrust case in which a major class action was dismissed on grounds of international comity. The case is one of the principal decisions actually applying, rather than merely alluding to, principles of international comity.

· Eagle et, al. v. Star-Kist Foods, Inc. Represented Star-Kist Foods, a subsidiary of H.J. Heinz Co., in successfully defending against a class action antitrust case brought by employees of tuna boats alleging that Star-Kist and other tuna canners conspired to fix prices on tuna fish bought by the canners. The appeals court upheld dismissal of the complaint for lack of standing.

· American Association of Cruise Passengers v. Cunard Line, Ltd. Represented Holland America in lengthy antitrust litigation, including two appeals to the D.C. Circuit, that ultimately gave Holland America a complete defense to jurisdiction based upon the intersection of the Federal Maritime Commission's primary jurisdiction and the Sherman Act.

· Gann v. Star-Kist Foods, Inc. Represented Star-Kist Foods in successfully defending against an antitrust case by a large group of tuna boat owners alleging that Star-Kist and other tuna canners conspired to fix prices on tuna sold by the boat owners.

· Retail Clerks Union v. Shell Oil. Represented Shell Oil Co. in successfully defending against an antitrust class action brought by gasoline station owners alleging that Shell and other major oil companies conspired to fix the price of gasoline in the US.

Pro Bono

· Joseph Palmour and Aihua Palmour v. The Cathedral Avenue Cooperative Inc. Represented plaintiffs in a case that established, for the first time, that the reasonable accommodations provisions of the Fair Housing Act could require an owner to allow tenants to work in the building if their disability precluded them from working outside their home.

Memberships and Affiliations

· American Bar Association, Member

· District of Columbia Bar Association, Member

· Flatirons Climbing Council, President

· The Access Fund, Volunteer

· Appalachian Trail Club, Publications Editor and Legal Committee Member (1985-1995)

Publications and Speeches

· "Traders In Our Midst: International Trade Regulation," Ithaca Policy Research (1981), Author

· "The Rights of Consumers," National Textbook Co. (1980), Co-Author

· "Safe But Sorry: The Case Against Consumer Product Regulation," Ithaca Policy Research (1980), Author

Judicial Clerkship

· Hon. Vincent L. McKusick, Maine Supreme Judicial Court, 1983-1984

 
ISLN906245918
 
Profile Visibility
#1,824 in weekly profile views out of 47,588 lawyers in Washington, District of Columbia
#62,278 in weekly profile views out of 1,447,639 total lawyers Overall

Office Information

Thomas A. Isaacson
Covington & Burling LLP
1201 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, DC 20004-2401




Loading...
 

Professional Networking for Legal Professionals Only

Quickly and easily expand your professional
network - join the premier global network for legal professionals only. It's powered by the
Martindale-Hubbell database - over 1,000,000 lawyers strong.
Join Now