Thomas J. Fisher: Lawyer with Oblon, Spivak, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, L.L.P.

Thomas J. Fisher

Phone(703) 412-6046

Peer Rating
 5.0/5.0
AV® Preeminent

Client Rating

Featured AV Peer Review Rated Lawyer IconFeatured AV Peer Review Rated Lawyer Icon
Printer Friendly VersionEmail this PageDownload to My Outlook ContactsAdd lawyer to My FavoritesCompare this lawyer to other lawyers in your favorites

Experience & Credentials Ratings & Reviews
 

Practice Areas

  • ITC Litigation
  • Litigation
  • Opinions and Counseling
  • IP Transactions
 
Contact InfoTelephone: (703) 412-6046
Facsimile: 703-413-2220
http://www.oblon.com/professional/thomas-j-fisher
 
University University of Pittsburgh, B.S., Electrical Engineering
 
Law SchoolGeorge Mason University School of Law, J.D.
 
Admitted1999, Virginia; Supreme Court of the United States; U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit; U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit; U.S. Court of International Trade; U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia; Registered to practice before the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
 
Memberships 

Professional Affiliations

•American Bar Association, Section of Intellectual Property Law

•American Intellectual Property Law Association (AIPLA)

•Federal Circuit Bar Association

•IEEE Computer Society

•Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers

•ITC Trial Lawyers Association

•Virginia State Bar, Intellectual Property Law Section

 
Biography

Thomas J. Fisher practices in the firm's Litigation practice group, and is Chair of the ITC Litigation practice group. His primary focus is on litigating complex electrical, mechanical, and computer software patents in federal district courts, in 337 proceedings before the International Trade Commission (ITC), and in appeals to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. Mr. Fisher has worked extensively with electrical and mechanical technologies such as software, encryption, GPS systems, micro-electro-mechanical systems (MEMS) technology, and medical devices.

A former electrical engineer, Mr. Fisher has more than 12 years of industry experience in electrical engineering, software, and information technology. As an engineer, he developed software solutions for business and government applications as well as modeling and simulation tools, analyst workstations, and real-time control systems including satellite ground systems and traffic control systems. He also owned and operated his own software consulting business, and has significant project management experience on large software development projects, as well as government contract procurement experience.

Mr. Fisher brings a unique combination of skills to his client representation. In addition to his litigation and technical background, he has practiced in the firm's Electrical and Mechanical Patent Prosecution and Post Grant practice groups in the areas of computer software, internet-related technologies, e-commerce technologies, digital communications, and telecommunications. Additionally, Mr. Fisher drafts opinions and counsels both domestic and foreign clients on patent portfolio development, licensing, litigation avoidance, risk management, and post-litigation tactics.

Mr. Fisher is a founder of, and actively contributes to the firm's legal blog devoted exclusively to Section 337 investigations before the ITC - the ITC 337 Law Blog. The site is the leading blog of its kind, and provides insights about the ITC's daily activity and significant decisions. He has lectured on U.S. patent law for the NDS Intellectual Property program at the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in Zurich, and frequently lectures worldwide on patent litigation and ITC litigation practice.

Accolades

'IP Star', Managing IP Magazine- (2013, 2014)

I ntellectual Asset Management (IAM) Patent 1000: The World's Leading Patent Practitioners, named to its list of the top 1000 patent attorneys in the world ; recognized in the National - International Trade Commission (ITC) category for his ITC litigation work and in the Washington, D.C. Metro Area for his patent Litigation work (2012- 2014)

Martindale-Hubbell AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5

Blogs
Did You Know...Satisfying The Domestic Industry Requirement With Licensing Now Requires Proof Of Articles Protected By The Patent?
Monday, May 19, 2014

In Section 337 actions before the International Trade Commission (“the Commission”), the complainant must establish that a domestic industry for articles protected by the asserted patent(s) exists or is in the process of being established. 19 U.S.C. 1337(a)(2). The domestic industry requirement consists of two prongs: an economic prong and...

Did You Know ... ITC Remedial Orders Can Be Modified Or Rescinded?
Tuesday, March 29, 2011

Under Commission Rule 210.76, any person who believes that “changed conditions of fact or law, or the public interest” require that an exclusion order, cease and desist order, or consent order be modified or set aside can petition the Commission for such relief. The petition must state the changes sought and the changed circumstances...

ITC Institutes Investigation (337-TA-717) Regarding Certain Digital Imaging Devices And Related Software
Friday, May 14, 2010

On May 13, 2010, the U.S. International Trade Commission issued a press release announcing that it voted to institute an investigation of Certain Digital Imaging Devices and Related Software (Inv. No. 337-TA-717).

Events
Industrial Technology Research Institute's Conference on Patent Litigation and Trends on NPE
Tuesday, October 30, 2012 - Wednesday, October 31, 2012
Current Topics in United States Patent Litigation: NPEs, the AIA, the ITC and eDiscovery
Monday, October 29, 2012
2012 Japan Intellectual Property Association (JIPA) Conference
Friday, October 26, 2012

News
Eleven Oblon Spivak Attorneys Recognized in Managing Intellectual Property's IP Stars 2014
Monday, April 21, 2014
Oblon Spivak Named to IAM Patent 1000 for National Patent Prosecution, ITC Litigation and Post-Grant Practices
Monday, August 5, 2013
Eleven Oblon Spivak Partners named “IP Stars” by Managing Intellectual Property's IP Handbook.
Saturday, June 15, 2013

Publications
Recent Trends in NPE Litigation
Monday, July 30, 2012
An Opposition To The Recently Proposed Legislation Related To Business Method Patents
Tuesday, April 1, 2003

Presentations
Leahy-Smith America Invents Act
Tuesday, November 22, 2011

 
Reported CasesRepresentative Matters: Represents a domestic sporting goods technology company in multiple patent infringement actions in various district courts and the Federal Circuit concerning GPS-based golf rangefinders. Represents a domestic food industry manufacturer in multiple patent infringement actions concerning aseptic bottling technology. Represented a domestic sporting goods technology company in multiple patent infringement actions in various district courts and the Federal Circuit concerning GPS-based golf rangefinders. The cases were settled. Represented a domestic jewelry marketing company in a patent infringement action concerning watches. The case was settled. Represented a domestic printing services company in a copyright, DMCA, and Lanham Act action. The case was settled. Represented an Asian microelectromechanical device manufacturer a 337 proceeding before the ITC and Federal Circuit in an action concerning packages for silicone microphones. Represented an Asian manufacturing company respondent in a 337 proceeding before the ITC and Federal Circuit involving connectors used in pneumatic systems. The Federal Circuit affirmed the ITC's finding of no violation of 337. Represents a patentee in a declaratory judgment action involving implantable pacing systems for treatment of congestive heart failure before the district court, Federal Circuit, and Supreme Court. Represented a domestic sporting goods manufacturer in a patent infringement action concerning protective equipment for lacrosse. The case was settled. Represented an Asian manufacturing company defendant in a patent infringement action concerning ultrasonic flow meters. The Federal Circuit affirmed the district court holding that the patent was invalid as obvious on summary judgment.
 
ISLN914995447
 

Documents by this lawyer on Martindale.com

Subscribe to this feed

Did You Know...Satisfying The Domestic Industry Requirement With Licensing Now Requires Proof Of Articles Protected By The Patent?
Thomas J. Fisher,Lisa M. Mandrusiak, May 23, 2014
In Section 337 actions before the International Trade Commission (“the Commission”), the complainant must establish that a domestic industry for articles protected by the asserted patent(s) exists or is in the process of being established. 19 U.S.C. § 1337(a)(2). The domestic...


View Ratings & Reviews
Profile Visibility
#22 in weekly profile views out of 3,082 lawyers in Alexandria, Virginia
#10,526 in weekly profile views out of 1,587,858 total lawyers Overall

Office Information

Thomas J. Fisher

1940 Duke Street
AlexandriaVA 22314




Loading...
 

Professional Networking for Legal Professionals Only

Quickly and easily expand your professional
network - join the premier global network for legal professionals only. It's powered by the
Martindale-Hubbell database - over 1,000,000 lawyers strong.
Join Now