martindale.com
Legal Library
|
Troutman Sanders LLP Document Search Results (300) Show: results per page Sort by:  | California Court Denies Coverage Under D&O Policy for Claim Arising From the Offering of Securitized Mortgages
Troutman Sanders LLP;
Legal Alert/Article March 8, 2013, previously published on February 28, 2012 On February 26, 2013, the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, in Impac Mortgage Holdings, Inc., et al. v. Houston Casualty Company, et al., granted partial summary judgment to a D&O insurer, finding that D&O coverage was not afforded for liability arising out of a mortgage...
| | Sequester Haircut for Section 1603 Grants Clarified by Treasury
Troutman Sanders LLP;
Legal Alert/Article March 8, 2013, previously published on March 5, 2013 On March 1, 2013, the sequester provided for in the Budget Control Act of 2011 went into effect due to the failure of the Administration and Congress to agree on legislation to reduce the federal budget deficit. Last fall, the Office of Management & Budget (OMB) reported to Congress the...
| | With Sequester, Government Contracting Officers May Insist on Strict Compliance
Troutman Sanders LLP;
Legal Alert/Article March 8, 2013, previously published on March 4, 2013 With the sequester taking place on March 1, 2013, there may be an uptick in workouts involving loans to government contractors, particularly with contractors who rely on bank lines of credit to fund daily operations. Recently, we have experienced significant push-back by government contracting...
| | Illinois Court Finds No Coverage for Village Based on Policies’ Absolute Pollution Exclusions
Troutman Sanders LLP;
Legal Alert/Article March 8, 2013, previously published on February 26, 2013 On February 22, 2013, the First District for the Illinois Court of Appeals affirmed summary judgment to insurers that issued excess public entity general liability insurance to the Village of Crestwood, Illinois. The Court found that the insurers had no duty to defend or indemnify the Village...
| | It’s Not Easy Being a Federal Contractor These Days...
Troutman Sanders LLP;
Legal Alert/Article March 8, 2013, previously published on March 4, 2013 Is your company a federal contractor or subcontractor? Have you been audited recently by the Office of Federal Contractor Compliance Programs ("OFCCP")? If it’s been a while since your last OFCCP audit, you may not realize how much more aggressive the OFCCP has become in the last...
| | FINRA Releases FAQs Related to Public Offering Review
Troutman Sanders LLP;
Legal Alert/Article March 8, 2013, previously published on February 25, 2013 FINRA has released certain Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) related to public offerings, including underwriting compensation and disclosure requirements regarding certain items of value.
| | D.C. Circuit Upholds FCC’s Interpretation of Pole Attachment Statute
Troutman Sanders LLP;
Legal Alert/Article March 8, 2013, previously published on March 4, 2013 On February 26, 2013, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit (“D.C. Circuit”) upheld an April 2011 Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) order that revised the FCC’s previous interpretation of Section 224 of the Communications Act...
| | Terminating an Employee for Being an ”Irresistible Attraction” - The Iowa Supreme Court Says This Is Not Discriminatory?
Troutman Sanders LLP;
Legal Alert/Article March 8, 2013, previously published on March 4, 2013 Is it lawful to terminate a female employee because the boss, and the boss’ wife, are worried that the boss would try to have an affair with the employee? In a case that has drawn national attention, the all-male Iowa Supreme Court, in Nelson v. James H. Knight, DDS, P.C., unanimously ruled...
| | OVERTIME UPDATE: The Potential High Costs of Volunteer Labor, Ten Record-Keeping Requirements, and the DOL’s New Smartphone App
Troutman Sanders LLP;
Legal Alert/Article March 8, 2013, previously published on March 4, 2013 Employers have come to understand that being sued by a former employee (particularly a disgruntled former employee) is a fact of life. But few employers anticipate being sued by a volunteer. Yet, these lawsuits happen.
| | Terminating an Employee for Being an "Irresistible Attraction" - The Iowa Supreme Court Says This Is Not Discriminatory
Troutman Sanders LLP;
Legal Alert/Article March 8, 2013, previously published on March 4, 2013 Is it lawful to terminate a female employee because the boss, and the boss’ wife, are worried that the boss would try to have an affair with the employee? In a case that has drawn national attention, the all-male Iowa Supreme Court, in Nelson v. James H. Knight, DDS, P.C., unanimously ruled...
|
|