Practice Areas & Industries: Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer P.A.

 




Appellate Practice Group Return to Practice Areas & Industries

Group Profile Lawyers in this Group Offices Locations for this Group
 

Practice/Industry Group Overview

In every tried case, there is a winner and a loser.  Whether you are victorious or vanquished and contemplating an appeal, the Appellate Practice Team at Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer can help.

Our appellate lawyers in NJ, NYC and PA recognize the practical need of many clients to have appeals handled in a thorough and professional yet economical fashion, a goal that we achieve by combining the talents of junior attorneys under the supervision and guidance of experienced senior appellate attorneys practicing within the Appellate Practice Team.  Regardless of the size of the case, we are prepared and have the resources to commit successfully to the handling and management of appellate matters from inception to conclusion.

Our Appellate Services

Our team has extensive appellate experience and a regular presence before both the federal and state appellate courts.  Our appellate attorneys collectively have a history, background and training in all facets of the appellate process — deciding whether and when to present an emergent application, move for leave to appeal, appeal from final judgments, how to structure appellate arguments, and the presentation of effective oral argument before appellate courts.  If your case is important enough to appeal or to defend on appeal, it should be important enough to hire experienced appellate counsel.

Representative Cases

The following are some of our appellate practice's more recent significant cases:

  • The firm established in a case of first impression that an exculpatory release, executed by a decedent as a condition to receiving scuba diving instructions, does not preclude the decedent's heirs from bringing a wrongful death action pursuant to New Jersey statute, and that the exculpatory agreement was unenforceable and void as against public policy.
  • In a case before the Appellate Division involving a novel interpretation and application of the redevelopment law, the firm defeated significant challenges in upholding the municipality's designation of its central business district as an area in need of redevelopment.
  • After being retained as appellate counsel, the firm successfully reversed a trial court's orders excluding an expert report submitted after the discovery deadline, and granting summary judgment to defendants in a professional malpractice action.
  • The firm successfully represented a major electric utility in upholding the comprehensive orders of the Board of Public Utilities, following lengthy, multi-party proceedings culminating in the restructuring of the electric utility industry in New Jersey. The firm, in the Appellate Division, the New Jersey Supreme Court, and the United States Supreme Court, overcame disputes over complex fact-finding regarding the valuation of power plants and the securitization of stranded original investment costs and numerous constitutional, statutory and procedural claims.
  • After the trial judge refused to grant a temporary restraining order against the award of a municipal contract, the firm successfully filed a motion for leave to appeal and for emergent relief, with the Appellate Court, which reversed the trial court's decision and directed issuance of an injunction. After trial, the firm's client prevailed on its claims.
  • In an unusual procedural case involving ancillary relief, the firm successfully petitioned the New Jersey Supreme Court to require an appellant to include in its supercedeas bond counsel fees awarded by the trial court, after the trial court, Appellate Division and a single Justice of the Supreme Court refused to do so.
  • The firm was successful on a motion for leave to appeal before the Appellate Division in reversing an order of the trial court that disqualified a law firm that had been extensively involved in the trial of the case.
  • The firm successfully represented an Abbott school district in complex and controversial litigation in the New Jersey Supreme Court, challenging budgets and programs for special-needs children.
  • The firm obtained a favorable ruling from the Third Circuit Court of Appeals, reversing the dismissal of the action by the district court regarding the due diligence requirement imposed upon counsel in connection with the practice of naming fictitious parties in a complaint.
  • The firm was successful in the Appellate Division in upholding a grant of summary judgment by the trial court in a matter in which the ownership of substantial commercial and residential property was at issue.

Our Appellate Lawyers

Our Appellate Practice Team has the distinctive ability to provide clients a "view from the bench" to help formulate winning appellate strategies and arguments. The team is co-chaired by Alan B. Handler, who served as an Associate Justice on the New Jersey Supreme Court for more than 22 years, and prior to that, as a member of the trial and appellate courts before joining the law firm as a member of its commercial litigation practice in September 1999. Justice Handler's insight and wealth of substantive knowledge developed over his extensive career offer reasoned evaluation of issues, sound advice for addressing them, and informed and skilled active participation in developing appellate strategy, positions, and arguments.

Other members of the Appellate Practice Team include Frederic K. Becker, former president of the Federal Bar Association, and Brian J. Molloy, co-chair of the Appellate Practice Team and Managing Director and President of the Firm. Mr. Molloy has been quoted in The New York Times and The Wall Street Journal and has appeared on "Good Morning America."

Many of our attorneys started their training in appellate practice while serving as judicial clerks to justices and judges on the New Jersey Supreme Court, the Appellate Division and the District Court of New Jersey. The law firm has an enviable track record of having its members appointed to the New Jersey Supreme Court and for recruiting distinguished former jurists to join the firm. In 1979, Robert N. Wilentz was chosen from the firm for appointment as Chief Justice of the New Jersey Supreme Court, one of the most significant higher courts in the nation, a position which he held with distinction until shortly before his death in 1996. More recently, Barry T. Albin, former chair of the firm's Criminal Law Department, was appointed an Associate Justice of the New Jersey Supreme Court, capping a remarkable career of 20 years at the law firm in trial and appellate work.


 

Services Available

 
 
Articles Authored by Lawyers at this office:

A Low or Mid-Level Employee Can Create A Privileged Communication, But Cannot Waive The Privilege Once Created
Donald E. Taylor,James E. Tonrey, October 29, 2013
Hedden v. Kean University, A-4999-12T2, decided by the New Jersey Appellate Division on October 24, 2013, provides a tutorial on the ability of low to mid-level employees to create privileged attorney client communications, and to waive that privilege by subsequent disclosures.