Home > Legal Library > Advanced Search > Search Results









Join Matindale-Hubbell Connected



Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer P.A. Document Search Results (5)

 

Sort by:
Sponsored Results

HTMLCheck--and Double Check--to Avoid Professional Liability in New Jersey
Grace D. Mack; Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer P.A.;
Legal Alert/Article
January 19, 2016, previously published on January 05, 2016
A recent New Jersey Supreme Court decision warns that health-care facilities that fail to do appropriate due diligence before granting privileges to physicians could face potential liability for that failure. In Jarrell v. Kaul, (2015 BL 315262, N.J., No. A-42-13, 9/29/15), the Supreme Court...

 

HTMLIntroducing Stark Phase V
Grace D. Mack; Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer P.A.;
Legal Alert/Article
January 19, 2016, previously published on January 5, 2016
On November 16, 2015, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (“CMS”) published the most significant changes to the physician self-referral law (“Stark Law”) regulations since 2008. Currently being referred to as “Stark Phase V,” these changes constitute...

 

HTMLSURPRISE!!! The NJ Out-of-Network Consumer Protection, Transparency, Cost Containment, and Accountability Act Goes Forward and Stalls
Grace D. Mack; Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer P.A.;
Legal Alert/Article
January 19, 2016, previously published on January 05, 2016
On November 17, 2015, New Jersey lawmakers forged ahead with the controversial legislation that addresses, among other things, “surprise” medical bills from out of network providers. According to its sponsors, the purpose of the Out-of-Network Consumer Protection, Transparency, Cost...

 

HTMLSpotlight on Telemedicine
Grace D. Mack; Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer P.A.;
Legal Alert/Article
January 19, 2016, previously published on January 5, 2016
Telemedicine is here to stay in 2016 and continues to be a rapidly evolving area of health law. Specifically, as of December, 2015:

 

Adobe PDFMain Street v. Hackensack: A Cure in the Redevelopment Area Process ... but Still in Need of an Ounce of Prevention
Anne S. Babineau, Laurie E. Meyers; Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer P.A.;
Legal Alert/Article
July 13, 2015, previously published on June 26, 2015
Until the recent Supreme Court decision in 62-64 Main Street, L.L.C. v. Hackensack, 221 N.J. 129 (2015) (“Hackensack”), many municipalities and developers of redevelopment projects were concerned that if an existing area in need designation was attacked, a court might invalidate the...