Home > Lawyer Profile
Home > Lawyer Profile
No photo Available

William Rutchow

Shareholder
Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C.
SunTrust Plaza, Suite 1200, 401 Commerce Street
Nashville, Tennessee 37219
Peer Rating
4.7 of 5.0
Client Rating
N/R
AV Rated
Experience & Credentials
Practice Areas
Employment Litigation (50%); Civil Litigation (20%); Occupational Safety and Health (5%); National Labor Relations Act (10%); Noncompetition and Non-Solicitation (15%);
University
Miami University, B.S., 1985
Law School
University of Michigan, J.D., 1988
Admitted
1988, South Carolina; 1995, Tennessee; 1999, Ohio
ISLN
901919142
Peer Reviews (17)
AV Rated
4.7/5.0
Peer Rating
 
High Ethical Standard
Employment Law, Civil Litigation, Labor and Employment, Litigation, Noncompete Litigation, Lanham Act, Employer Rights, Labor Relations and Employment Defense
Areas of Practice
Legal Knowledge
4.8/5
Analytical Capabilities
4.7/5
Judgment
4.6/5
Communication Ability
4.6/5
Legal Experience
4.7/5
Peer Reviews (17)
5.0/5.0 Posted by a Managing Partner on 06/08/14
Excleent lawyer of the highest caliber in legal and ethics !
Legal Knowledge
5.0/5
Analytical Capabilities
5.0/5
Judgment
5.0/5
Communication Ability
5.0/5
Legal Experience
5.0/5
5.0/5.0 Posted by a Managing Partner on 05/23/14
Excellent lawyer. highly ethical. Well thought of by peers and contemporaries.
Legal Knowledge
5.0/5
Analytical Capabilities
5.0/5
Judgment
5.0/5
Communication Ability
5.0/5
Legal Experience
5.0/5
5.0/5.0 Posted by a Sole Practitioner on 06/02/14
Legal Knowledge
5.0/5
Analytical Capabilities
5.0/5
Judgment
5.0/5
Communication Ability
5.0/5
Legal Experience
5.0/5
5.0/5.0 Posted by a Managing Partner on 05/31/14
Legal Knowledge
5.0/5
Analytical Capabilities
5.0/5
Judgment
5.0/5
Communication Ability
5.0/5
Legal Experience
5.0/5
5.0/5.0 Posted by a Of Counsel on 05/26/14
Legal Knowledge
5.0/5
Analytical Capabilities
5.0/5
Judgment
5.0/5
Communication Ability
5.0/5
Legal Experience
5.0/5
5.0/5.0 Posted by a Associate on 04/12/14
Legal Knowledge
5.0/5
Analytical Capabilities
5.0/5
Judgment
5.0/5
Communication Ability
5.0/5
Legal Experience
5.0/5
5.0/5.0 Posted by a Associate/Assistant General Counsel on 04/04/14
Legal Knowledge
5.0/5
Analytical Capabilities
5.0/5
Judgment
5.0/5
Communication Ability
5.0/5
Legal Experience
5.0/5
5.0/5.0 Posted by a Judge on 03/27/14
Legal Knowledge
5.0/5
Analytical Capabilities
5.0/5
Judgment
5.0/5
Communication Ability
5.0/5
Legal Experience
5.0/5
5.0/5.0 Posted by a Judge on 03/27/14
Legal Knowledge
5.0/5
Analytical Capabilities
5.0/5
Judgment
5.0/5
Communication Ability
5.0/5
Legal Experience
5.0/5
5.0/5.0 Posted by a Partner on 03/27/14
Legal Knowledge
5.0/5
Analytical Capabilities
5.0/5
Judgment
5.0/5
Communication Ability
5.0/5
Legal Experience
5.0/5
5.0/5.0 Posted by a Managing Partner on 03/27/14
Legal Knowledge
5.0/5
Analytical Capabilities
5.0/5
Judgment
5.0/5
Communication Ability
5.0/5
Legal Experience
5.0/5
4.8/5.0 Posted by a Member on 06/02/14
Legal Knowledge
5.0/5
Analytical Capabilities
5.0/5
Judgment
5.0/5
Communication Ability
5.0/5
Legal Experience
4.0/5
4.2/5.0 Posted by a Associate/Assistant General Counsel on 06/09/14
Legal Knowledge
4.0/5
Analytical Capabilities
4.0/5
Judgment
4.0/5
Communication Ability
4.0/5
Legal Experience
5.0/5
4.0/5.0 Posted by a Partner on 05/31/14
Legal Knowledge
4.0/5
Analytical Capabilities
4.0/5
Judgment
4.0/5
Communication Ability
4.0/5
Legal Experience
4.0/5
4.0/5.0 Posted by a Member on 05/27/14
Legal Knowledge
4.0/5
Analytical Capabilities
4.0/5
Judgment
4.0/5
Communication Ability
4.0/5
Legal Experience
4.0/5
4.0/5.0 Posted by a Partner on 03/27/14
Legal Knowledge
4.0/5
Analytical Capabilities
4.0/5
Judgment
4.0/5
Communication Ability
4.0/5
Legal Experience
4.0/5
3.8/5.0 Posted by a General Counsel on 05/23/14
Legal Knowledge
5.0/5
Analytical Capabilities
4.0/5
Judgment
3.0/5
Communication Ability
3.0/5
Legal Experience
4.0/5
*Individual reviews provided before 2009 are not displayed
Disclaimer: No representation is made that the quality of legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers. The testimonial or endorsement does not constitute a guarantee, warranty, or prediction regarding the outcome of your legal matter. Any result that the endorsed lawyer or law firm may achieve on behalf of one client in one matter does not necessarily indicate that similar results can be obtained for other clients. Past success cannot be an assurance of future success because each case must be decided on its own merits. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Martindale-Hubbell® does not undertake to develop a Client Review Rating or Peer Review Rating for all firms and/or lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed as unfavorable. Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for and will not be liable for the content and accuracy of the individual Reviews and the aggregated Reviews.