Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP

  - Office Profile
 





                  Firm Logo for Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman Dicker LLP
Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman
& Dicker LLP
 
Houston, Texas Office
View all offices

5847 San Felipe, Suite 2300
Houston, Texas  77057-4033

(Ft. Bend, Harris & Montgomery Cos.)

Telephone: 713-353-2000
Facsimile: 713-785-7780
http://www.wilsonelser.com

Profile Visibility
#112 in weekly profile views out of 4,755 law firms in Houston, Texas
#12 in weekly profile views out of 279,821 total law firms Overall

CLM


About this office:

Wilson Elser helps individuals and organizations transcend challenges and realize goals by offering an optimal balance of legal excellence and bottom-line value.

Nearly 800 attorneys strong, our firm serves clients of all sizes, across multiple industries and around the world. Wilson Elser has 23 strategically located offices in the United States, another in London and several European affiliates. This depth and scale has made us one of the nation's most influential law firms, ranked in the Am Law 200 and in the top 50 of the National Law Journal 250.

Since our founding in 1978, Wilson Elser has forged a reputation as a formidable player in insurance coverage and defense. Our experience in this tightly regulated, cost-conscious industry has shaped a firm culture of accomplished professionalism and cost efficiency that delivers demonstrable value to clients.

Today, Wilson Elser provides clients with full-service, first-class legal services, spanning the spectrum of litigation and related areas. We apply the discipline and diligence of effective litigation to virtually all areas of the law, drawing from 55 service areas to create multidisciplinary teams that give each client matter the best of the firm's collective intelligence and capabilities.

Our firm's uncommonly high concentration of seasoned senior litigators gives us an advantage when handling our clients' most challenging and technical cases. More broadly, many of our attorneys have specialized degrees in business, engineering, medicine and accounting, as well as extensive on-the-ground professional experience, which translate into client solutions that work in the real world.

By combining our attorneys' deep experience with the vast resources and technical capacity of a large and highly respected firm, Wilson Elser consistently provides our clients with sound, uncompromising legal representation.



 

Specific Practice & Industry Groups Details:
AppellateArchitects & Engineers
AsbestosAviation & Aerospace
Class Action DefenseCommercial & Business Litigation
ConstructionEmployment & Labor
EnergyEnvironmental
EuropeGeneral Liability & Casualty
Insurance & Reinsurance CoverageInsurance & Reinsurance Defense
Intellectual PropertyLatin America
LawyersLife, Health, Disability & ERISA
Municipal/Local GovernmentPharmaceuticals & Medical Devices
Product LiabilityRailroad
Toxic TortTransportation
United Kingdom


Statement of Practice Summary:
Banking, Bankruptcy, Collections, Corporate and Partnership Law, Commercial Litigation, Construction Law, Civil Rights Litigation, Debtor and Creditor's Rights, Employment Practices, Environmental Regulation, Equipment Leasing, Foreclosures, Land Use, Municipal Law, Municipal Liability, Negotiable Instruments and Funds Transfer, Police Liability, Real Estate, Secured Transactions, Zoning and Planning.


Documents by Lawyers at this office
Subscribe to this feed

Texas Supreme Court Enforces Medical Criteria for Claims Involving Asbestos and Declares the Application of Chapter 90 Constitutional
Shawn D. Golden,Sean Higgins,James H. Powers, July 29, 2014
In a 5-4 opinion issued in Union Carbide Corporation v. Daisy E. Synatzske et al. No. 12-0617 (Tex. July 3, 2014), the Texas Supreme Court held that Chapter 90 of the Texas Civil Practices and Remedies Code as applied to the plaintiffs does not violate the Texas Constitution’s prohibition...

Texas Supreme Court Holds That Requirement to Provide Evidence of Approximate Dose Applies to Mesothelioma Cases as Well as Asbestosis Cases
Sean Higgins, July 29, 2014
On July 12, 2014, in Bostic v. Georgia Pacific Corp., No. 10-0775, a six-justice majority of the Texas Supreme Court issued a major decision on causation in asbestos cases. The Court held that the requirement to provide evidence of approximate dose announced in Borg Warner v. Flores, 232 S.W.3d 765...




Return to the Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman
& Dicker LLP
 Firm Overview


 

Complete a Client Review


Have you recently worked with this firm? Share your experience as a Client of this firm and complete a Client Review to help others make an informed choice when hiring legal counsel.
 
 

Purchase Report

Buy an atVantage Firm Profile for insight into a law firm's litigation, bankruptcy, corporate transaction and patent prosecution experience.
 
 

Compare this Firm

Compare this firm to other firms in your Favorites.
 

Add firm to Favorites

As a registered user of martindale.com Connected, you can add firms to your list of Favorites. You can securely add comments and compare the firms in your Favorites.