Home > Legal Library > Advanced Search > Search Results









Join Matindale-Hubbell Connected



Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP Los Angeles, CA Document Search Results (9)

 

Sort by:
Sponsored Results

HTMLU.S. Supreme Court Upholds Privacy Rights for Los Angeles Hotel Operators
Michael C. Douglass; Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
July 15, 2015, previously published on July 13, 2015
In a win for privacy advocates, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that a City of Los Angeles municipal ordinance permitting warrantless police searches of hotel registries is unconstitutional. The subject ordinance (Los Angeles Municipal Code section 41.49 3(a)) required hotel operators to hand over...

 

HTMLWelcome to the Digital Age, Officer
Michael C. Douglass; Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
July 14, 2015, previously published on June 25, 2015
California SB 178 Seeks to Apply Warrant Requirement to Electronic Devices and Online Data

 

HTMLTwitter Terrorism: Criminals Choose the Hack Attack
Ian A. Stewart, Scott Sweeney; Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
July 14, 2015, previously published on July 6, 2015
In what appears to be yet another brazen demonstration of capability following an earlier hijack of government social media sites, a group calling itself the Syrian Electronic Army (SEA) recently hacked into the U.S. Army’s main news and public information website, positing its own message...

 

HTMLSupreme Court’s Marriage Decision Should Prompt Employers’ Review of All Employment Policies
Angela M. Duerden, Dean A. Rocco; Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
July 8, 2015, previously published on June 30, 2015
“No union is more profound than marriage, for it embodies the highest ideals of love, fidelity, devotion, sacrifice, and family. In forming a marital union, two people become something greater than once they were. ... Their plea is that they do respect it, respect it so deeply that they seek...

 

HTMLToday's Immigration Debate Impacts California Employment Law and Litigation
Ashley R. Morris, Dean A. Rocco; Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
May 29, 2015, previously published on May 27, 2015
A year ago, the California Supreme Court limited damages in employment discrimination claims brought under the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) when an employer discovers it employed an unauthorized worker. In Salas v. Sierra Chemical Co. (June 26, 2014), the Court determined...

 

HTMLIs International Service of Process by Mail Permitted?
John R. Danos; Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
April 15, 2015, previously published on December 1, 2014
When a foreign client is sued in a U.S. court, the first question we typically address is the issue of how the complaint was served. It is not uncommon for some plaintiff’s lawyers to attempt service of process over a foreign entity by mailing the complaint to the company’s...

 

HTMLFourth District Reverses Lower Court Ruling in Construction Defect Litigation
John R. Clifford, Edward P. Garson, Gregory D. Hagen, Ian A. Stewart; Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
March 5, 2015, previously published on February 18, 2015
On January 22, 2015, the Fourth District Court of Appeals issued for publication its decision in McMillin Companies LLC v. American Safety Indemnity Company, 4th Dist. Div. 1, D063586.

 

HTMLCalifornia Appellate Court Limits Liability under California’s Medical Confidentiality Act for Disclosure of Medical Information
Jeremy L. Ross, Ian A. Stewart, Melissa K. Ventrone; Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
October 2, 2014, previously published on September 22, 2014
In what should be considered a win for the defense, the California Third Appellate Court recently overturned the lower court’s denial of a motion to dismiss a class action lawsuit seeking $4 billion in damages under California’s Medical Confidentiality Act (the Act) due to the alleged...

 

HTMLUnder the Right Circumstances, an Insured Entitled to “Independent Counsel” in California Can Retain More Than One Firm
Carey B. Moorehead; Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
September 8, 2014, previously published on September 5, 2014
In a case of first impression, a California District Court has ruled that California law does not preclude an insured from retaining multiple law firms as independent or Cumis counsel where the insurer is defending under reservation of rights. The court’s ruling came in the case of Signal...