Home > Legal Library > Advanced Search > Search Results









Join Matindale-Hubbell Connected



Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP New York, WY Document Search Results (29)

 

View Page: 1  2  3  Next  
Show: results per page
Sort by:
Sponsored Results

Adobe PDFWill Amendments to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 26(b)(1) and 37(e) Reduce the Scope and Costs of Discovery?
Daniel M. Braude, Marianna Codispoti; Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
December 9, 2015, previously published on December 1, 2015
December 1, 2015, which quite fittingly has been declared the inaugural E-Discovery Day, marks the implementation of a package of amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, concluding a process that began more than five years ago. Most notably, Rules 26(b)(1) and 37(e) have received...

 

HTMLNYCAL Presiding Judge Rules Manufacturer Should Have Reasonably Anticipated Asbestos Litigation 10 Years Before First Lawsuit
Erik C. DiMarco; Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
November 27, 2015, previously published on November 24, 2015
On November 5, 2015, Judge Peter H. Moulton, presiding judge over the New York City Asbestos Litigation (NYCAL), ruled in Warren v. AmChem Products, et al., 190281/2014, that J-M Manufacturing Company, Inc., was subject to spoliation sanctions for the destruction of corporate documents in two...

 

HTMLSupreme Court Adopts Amendments to Federal Rules That May Deter Patent Infringement Lawsuits, Especially Those Filed by Non-practicing Entities
Gregory N. Brescia, Jura Christine Zibas; Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
November 9, 2015, previously published on November 2, 2015
In April 2015, the United States Supreme Court adopted Congress’s amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, in part abolishing Rule 84 and along with it Form 18, which allows plaintiffs to file bare-bones patent complaints. Until the amendments, a plaintiff could file austere...

 

HTMLThe Internet of Things and the Inevitable Collision with Product Liability PART 4: Government Oversight
H. Michael O'Brien; Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman Dicker LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
October 26, 2015, previously published on October 16, 2015
The exponential growth of the Internet of Things (IoT) is far outpacing the ability of stakeholders to address safety standards and security concerns. This is not unusual as rapidly developing technology often challenges regulators and standards organizations to develop a framework for consensus...

 

HTMLNYC Institutes New Requirements for Cooling Towers in Wake of Legionnaires’ Disease Deaths
Jonathan L. Bing, Neha Dewan; Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
September 18, 2015, previously published on September 17, 2015
Twelve deaths from Legionnaires’ disease linked to a cooling tower in the South Bronx prompted New York City to pass a law on August 18, 2015, that requires all cooling towers to be registered with the Department of Buildings and includes specific mandates for compliance with health and...

 

HTML3D-Printed Prescription Drugs a Huge Stride Forward for Personalized Medicine
Amy L. Baker, Genese K. Dopson, Rosario M. Vignali; Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
September 17, 2015, previously published on September 16, 2015
Advances in 3D printing (3DP) technology have paved the way for pharmaceutical companies to print prescription drugs. Aprecia Pharmaceuticals recently announced that the FDA has granted it approval to manufacture Spritam® (levetiracetam), an antiepileptic medication, using 3DP technology....

 

HTMLIs Our Legal System Ready for the Evolution of 3D Printing Technology?
Amy L. Baker, Genese K. Dopson, Rosario M. Vignali; Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
September 10, 2015, previously published on September 9, 2015
When we wrote back in November 2013 about 3D Printing and Product Liability Law, we predicted that the 3D printing revolution “will challenge our long-held notions of product liability law and the common assumptions made regarding the liability of various entities in the chain of...

 

HTMLNLRB Issues Controversial Decision Changing the Standard for Joint Employer Status
Yoora Pak, Sara E. Robinson, Ricki E. Roer; Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
September 1, 2015, previously published on August 28, 2015
On August 27, 2015, in a 3-2 decision, the National Labor Relations Board (the Board) determined that Browning-Ferris Industries of California was a joint employer of workers hired by a contractor to staff one of Browning-Ferris’s recycling plants. Browning-Ferris contracted with Leadpoint, a...

 

HTMLThe Internet of Things and the Inevitable Collision with Products Liability PART 3: Initial Contact
H. Michael O'Brien; Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
August 13, 2015, previously published on July 28, 2015
This is the third in a series of blogs examining the rapid development of the Internet of Things (IoT) and its consequential impact on product liability risk. The development of the IoT has been so rapid and the applications so ubiquitous across every imaginable industry and commercial enterprise...

 

HTMLFRE 502(d) - An Underutilized “Safety Net” in Document Intensive Litigation
Selina A. Billington, Daniel M. Braude; Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
August 12, 2015
The inadvertent disclosure of privileged material may haunt a company for years, particularly in today’s era of pattern litigation and increased collaboration within the plaintiffs’ bar. Fortunately, in matters pending in federal court, this consequence can be avoided through the use of...

 


View Page: 1  2  3  Next