Legal Articles: Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP

 







Document(s) published by this organization: 133


View Page: 1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next  >>
Show: results per page
Sort by:

HTMLChicago Federal Court Bars Expert Testimony Espousing the “Any Exposure” Theory 
Karen E. Bettcher, Anthony M. Goldner; Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
March 13, 2015, previously published on January 12, 2015
On December 22, 2014, in a pre-trial ruling, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, in Krik v. Crane Co., et al., No. 1:10-cv-07435 (N.D. Ill. December 22, 2014) barred perennial plaintiff’s expert Dr. Arthur Frank and other experts for the plaintiff from providing...

 

HTMLEvery Case Is an e-Discovery Case in Today’s Litigation Environment
Thomas W. Tobin; Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
March 13, 2015, previously published on January 15, 2015
Lawyers routinely negotiate the scope of litigation discovery demands. One such lawyer was recently faced with a wildly broad discovery demand for relevant emails from the time a product was manufactured more than fifteen years ago to the present. The lawyer deftly negotiated the demand down to...

 

HTMLA Pre-answer Motion to Deposit Funds 
Robert P. Lesko; Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
March 13, 2015, previously published on December 11, 2014
The federal interpleader statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1335 - Interpleader, on its face suggests that a disinterested stakeholder seeking interpleader relief must first deposit the funds with the Clerk of the Court for the district court to acquire jurisdiction over the proceeding and grant relief to...

 

HTMLCorporate Hacking and the Financial Services Industry
Carlos Enrique Provencio, Melissa K. Ventrone; Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
March 13, 2015, previously published on February 2, 2015
The question is not whether you are going to be hacked, but rather when and how often. That thinking is so pervasive in the cyber-security industry that industry participants now refer to “cyber-resilience” to better describe a realistic and effective cyber-defense plan. Nobody can have...

 

HTMLWisconsin Supreme Court: Pollution Exclusion Bars Coverage for Well Contamination Resulting from the Application of Manure and Septage as Fertilizer
William J. Katt, Carl J. Pernicone, Heather L. Utlaut; Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
March 13, 2015, previously published on January 14, 2015
In Wilson Mutual Ins. Co. v. Robert Falk and Jane Falk, 2013AP691 & 2013AP776, and Preisler v. Kuettel’s Septic Serv., 2012AP2521, the Wisconsin Supreme Court sought to resolve conflicting court of appeals’ decisions on whether excrement (manure and septic waste, respectively) are...

 

HTMLBoom or Bust? Cyber Security and Data Breach Loss in Latin America
Scott Sweeney; Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
March 5, 2015, previously published on February 25, 2015
Every day in the news we are assaulted by reports of cyber security and data breaches of industry giants, major retailers and financial conglomerates that compromise the privacy and security of millions. In the wake of such crimes, cyber insurance premiums last year reached $2.5 billion, a 25...

 

HTMLCalifornia Appellate Court Finds No Malicious Product Tampering Coverage for Westland’s Ground Beef
Joseph F. Bermudez, Suzanne M. Meintzer; Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
March 5, 2015, previously published on February 11, 2015
In 2008, Windsor Food Quality Company, Ltd. (Windsor) purchased Westland/Hallmark Meat Company’s (Westland’s) ground beef as an ingredient to be used in its José Olé® frozen food products. On January 30, 2008, the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) suspended...

 

HTMLColorado Supreme Court: Late Notice Inexcusable under Claims-Made Policies
Suzanne M. Meintzer; Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
March 5, 2015, previously published on February 23, 2015
In Craft v. Philadelphia Indemnity Ins. Co., 2015 CO 11 (Colo. Feb. 17, 2015), Craft was the principal shareholder and president of two entities to which Philadelphia issued claims-made directors and officers coverage. One of the entities sued Craft for misrepresentations allegedly made in the...

 

HTMLNew Jersey Supreme Court Rules No Time Bar for Spill Act Contribution Claims
Barbara Hopkinson Kelly, Suna Lee, Erik M. Ortega; Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
March 5, 2015, previously published on February 5, 2015
In a unanimous decision on January 26, 2015, the Supreme Court of New Jersey, in Morristown Associates v. Grant Oil Co., overturned two lower-court decisions and held that the six-year statute of limitations for damage to real property does not apply to Spill Act private contribution claims. The...

 

HTMLIndemnification by Insurance Precluded under Wyoming Anti-indemnity Statute in Oil & Gas Personal Injury Coverage Dispute
Cathleen H. Heintz; Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
March 5, 2015, previously published on January 16, 2015
On December 19, 2014, the Federal District Court in Wyoming issued a decision in Lexington Insurance Company v. Precision Drilling Co., LP, et al., D. Wyo., Case No. 12-cv-070-J, extending the reach of the anti-indemnity statute, Wyoming Statute §30-1-131, to preclude coverage of a drilling...

 


View Page: 1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next  >>