Home > Legal Library > Advanced Search > Search Results









Join Matindale-Hubbell Connected



Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP Document Search Results (191)

 

View Page: Prev  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next  >>
Show: results per page
Sort by:
Sponsored Results

HTMLTwitter Terrorism: Criminals Choose the Hack Attack
Ian A. Stewart, Scott Sweeney; Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
July 14, 2015, previously published on July 6, 2015
In what appears to be yet another brazen demonstration of capability following an earlier hijack of government social media sites, a group calling itself the Syrian Electronic Army (SEA) recently hacked into the U.S. Army’s main news and public information website, positing its own message...

 

HTMLMassachusetts Appeals Court Adopts Two-Prong Continuity and Profit Motive Test to Determine Whether Business Pursuits Exclusion Applies Under Homeowners' Policy
William T. Bogaert, Kara Thorvaldsen; Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
July 13, 2015, previously published on July 7, 2015
The Massachusetts Appeals Court has provided some much needed guidance on the “business pursuits exclusion” in a recent coverage dispute between a homeowners’ insurer and a commercial liability insurer. In Preferred Mutual Ins. Co. v. Vermont Mut. Ins. Co., Mass. App. Ct. No....

 

HTMLEleventh Circuit Denies Coverage for Wrongful Acts of Directors and Officers That Arose Out of Their Wrongful Acts as Trustees, an Uninsured Capacity
Thomas M. Spitaletto, James K. Thurston; Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
July 8, 2015, previously published on June 30, 2015
On Monday, June 22, 2015, the Eleventh Circuit, in The Langdale Company v. National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA, No. 14-12723 (11th Cir. 2015), ruled for the insurer on a “capacity” exclusion in a director and officer policy that precluded coverage for loss in...

 

HTMLU.S. Supreme Court Upholds Disparate-Impact Claims in Fair Housing Act Cases
Robert A. Spolzino; Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
July 8, 2015, previously published on July 2, 2015
On June 25, 2015, in Texas Dep't of Housing and Community Affairs v. Inclusive Communities Project , the U.S. Supreme Court held that a plaintiff may establish a prima facie case under the Fair Housing Act (FHA) on the basis of statistical evidence that a governmental policy causes a disparate...

 

HTMLSupreme Court’s Marriage Decision Should Prompt Employers’ Review of All Employment Policies
Angela M. Duerden, Dean A. Rocco; Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
July 8, 2015, previously published on June 30, 2015
“No union is more profound than marriage, for it embodies the highest ideals of love, fidelity, devotion, sacrifice, and family. In forming a marital union, two people become something greater than once they were. ... Their plea is that they do respect it, respect it so deeply that they seek...

 

HTMLHope for Computer-Related Patents
Gregory N. Brescia, Robert P. Feinland, Jura Christine Zibas; Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
June 26, 2015, previously published on June 17, 2015
“Let's be clear: if all of these claims, including the system claims, are not patent-eligible, this case is the death of hundreds of thousands of patents, including all business method, financial system, and software patents as well as many computer implemented and telecommunications...

 

HTMLKentucky Supreme Court Reinforces Importance of Properly Incorporated Arbitration Provisions to Larger Agreements
Edward M. O'Brien; Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman Dicker LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
June 26, 2015, previously published on June 19, 2015
The Kentucky Supreme Court recently held that an arbitration provision signed by a class of students upon their application and acceptance to a for-profit college was unenforceable because the enrollment agreement did not properly incorporate the arbitration provision. Facing unemployment and...

 

HTMLMichael Jordan Defends His Right to Remain in Court to Protect His Likeness
Adam R. Bialek, Jason M. Kuzniar; Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
June 24, 2015, previously published on June 11, 2015
On March 19, 2015, Wilson Elser published “Michael Jordan Denied Summary Judgment on His Right of Publicity Claim against Illinois Grocer,” an Alert concerning a case in which Michael Jordan was denied summary judgment on his right of publicity claim against Jewel Food Stores, Inc.,...

 

HTMLColorado Supreme Court Upholds Employers’ Right to Terminate for Use of Medical Marijuana During Nonworking Hours
Shawna Ruetz, Henry L. Solano, Scott Sweeney; Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
June 24, 2015, previously published on June 16, 2015
On June 15, 2015, in Coats v. Dish Network, No. 13SC394, the Colorado Supreme Court unanimously held under the plain language of C.R.S. § 24-34-402.5, Colorado’s “lawful activities statute,” that the term “lawful” refers only to those activities that are lawful...

 

HTMLCommercial Division of the New York State Supreme Court Implements Rules to Streamline Litigation, Improve Efficiency, Enhance Judicial Expertise and Limit Costs
Peter A. Lauricella; Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
June 24, 2015, previously published on June 16, 2015
In 1995, due to a growing caseload of complex commercial litigation matters being filed in New York State Supreme Court (New York’s trial-level court of “supreme” jurisdiction), the Office of Court Administration (OCA) created the Commercial Division of the Supreme Court....

 


View Page: Prev  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next  >>