Customer Support: 800-526-4902
 
Home > Legal Library > Article




Join Matindale-Hubbell Connected


ALJ Rogers Grants Motion to Compel Depositions in Certain Projectors with Controlled-Angle Optical Retarders (337-TA-815)




by:
Alexander E. Gasser
Oblon, Spivak, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, L.L.P. - Alexandria Office

 
July 10, 2012

Previously published on July 6, 2012

On June 28, 2012, ALJ Robert K. Rogers, Jr. issued the public version of Order No. 12 (dated May 9, 2012) in Certain Projectors with Controlled-Angle Optical Retarders, Components Thereof, and Products Containing Same (Inv. No. 337-TA-815). In the Order, ALJ Rogers granted Respondent Sony Corporation’s (“Sony”) motion to compel Complainants Compound Photonics U.S. Corporation and Compound Photonics Ltd. (collectively “Compound Photonics”) to schedule earlier depositions of Compound Photonics representatives and employees.

According to the Order, Sony sought to take the deposition of Complainant’s corporate representatives and ten employees, and the sole issue of the motion related to the timing of the deposition. Sony complained that it issued the deposition notices in March, but Complainant Compound Photonics proposed to schedule most of the depositions about two weeks prior to the July 27, 2012 deadline for the close of fact discovery, which Sony alleged was prejudicial. Compound Photonics responded it was unable to provide any witnesses during the entire month of May due to their devoting all of May to development projects making its “pico projector...available for demonstration by mid-2012.”

ALJ Rogers determined that since Complainants initiated this investigation, they “cannot unilaterally decide that the month of May is off-limits for depositions” due to certain development projects, and that they “cannot now delay discovery because” they are “too busy” working on these other projects. ALJ Rogers also stated that Compound Photonics offered no detailed declarations from its employees evidencing the time-sensitive nature of these development projects, and therefore, it could not delay discovery based on an “unsupported claim that its employees are too busy with other work.”

Based on the above, ALJ Rogers granted Sony’s motion to compel, and ordered the parties to meet and confer, and that the depositions shall be scheduled in May and June of 2012, such that all of them would be completed no later than June 15, 2012.



 

The views expressed in this document are solely the views of the author and not Martindale-Hubbell. This document is intended for informational purposes only and is not legal advice or a substitute for consultation with a licensed legal professional in a particular case or circumstance.
 

View More Library Documents By...

 
Author
 
Alexander E. Gasser
 
Oblon, Spivak, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, L.L.P. Overview


 

Practice Area Resource Centers
Visit our Practice Area Resource Centers to view practice area specific content compiled from a variety of legal sources. Find related articles, podcasts, industry leader insights and much more. We currently offer the following Practice Areas:Litigation;Intellectual Property;Real Estate;Corporate Law;Criminal Law;Bankruptcy;Immigration;Business Law;Insurance;Taxation;Labor & Employment;Commercial Law;Medical Malpractice;Trusts & Estates;Securities;International Law ;Health Care;Environmental Law;Construction Law;Workers' Compensation