Home > Legal Library > Article




Join Matindale-Hubbell Connected


The Federal Trade Commission Again Targets 'Made-In-USA' Claims




by:
Irving Scher
Greenberg Traurig, LLP - New York Office

 
November 11, 2013

Previously published on November 11, 2013

After a more than 10 year hiatus, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has again brought an enforcement action under its 1997 Policy Statement on “Made in USA” claims.  The Policy Statement prohibits advertising a product as “Made in USA” (or equivalent statements) unless “all or virtually all” labor and materials are domestic.

The recent action was against E.K. Ekcessories, Inc., a distributor of cell phone accessories and other products. All the products were advertised as “Made in USA.” Some however, were allegedly imported. Others, while assembled in the United States, allegedly contained substantial amounts of imported content.  It is the first FTC enforcement action under its Policy Statement since an initial flurry of such actions in the late 1990s.

Under the FTC Policy Statement, no more than a “negligible” amount of foreign content or processing is allowed for a product advertised as “Made in USA.”  However, the Policy Statement does allow a seller to use a limited or “qualified” form of claim to signal when part of the labor and material in a product is domestic and part is not.  An example might be to advertise that a fashion product is sewn in the United States using imported fabric.  Information about what kinds of claims are allowed or not allowed can be found at www.business.ftc.gov/documents/bus03-complying-made-usa-standard.

Unfortunately, the guidance from the FTC on what forms of “qualified claims” are allowed is not always easy to interpret.  Accordingly, legal guidance should be sought with respect to any intended “qualified claims” that might be acceptable to the FTC.

Given the FTC’s renewed interest in “Made in USA” claims, manufacturers and distributors should take particular care to comply with the 1997 Policy Statement requirements. This is true not only to help avoid an FTC investigation, but also to help reduce the risk of consumer class action claims, which often follow in the wake of FTC enforcement activity.



 

The views expressed in this document are solely the views of the author and not Martindale-Hubbell. This document is intended for informational purposes only and is not legal advice or a substitute for consultation with a licensed legal professional in a particular case or circumstance.
 

View More Library Documents By...

 
Author
 
Irving Scher
 
Greenberg Traurig, LLP Overview