High Court Rejects Expansion of Judicial Review of Arbitration Awards

by Andrew C. Kolb View Biography
Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz, PC View Firm Credentials
Baton Rouge Office

More...

Articles by this author

Articles by this firm

Articles by this topic

May 9, 2008

Previously published on Spring 2008

By a 6-3 margin, the U.S. Supreme Court recently held in Hall Street Associates, L.L.C. v. Mattel, Inc., U.S. No. 06-989 (3/25/08) that parties to an arbitration agreement may not contractually expand the grounds upon which a federal court can review an arbitration award.

Start New Search

View the full text of this article

The views expressed in this article are solely the views of the author and not Martindale-Hubbell. This article is intended for informational purposes only and is not legal advice or a substitute for consultation with a licensed legal professional in a particular case or circumstance.

Search Legal Topics

High Court Rejects Expansion of Judicial Review of Arbitration Awards

More...