Lexis Nexis
 |    |  
Premier Destination for Sophisticated Buyers of Legal Services

Home > Search Legal Topics > Article Abstract



Martindale-Hubbell Article RSS Feeds Article Feeds

Mediation: Is It Still a Poor Alternative to Judicial or Arbitral Proceedings?


by James Lloyd Loftis View Biography
Vinson & Elkins RLLP View Firm Credentials
London Office

Samantha Tite
Vinson & Elkins RLLP View Firm Credentials
Houston Office

July 18, 2008

Previously published on July 7, 2008

Historically, the general consensus of mediation - a form of alternative dispute resolution that typically entails a confidential process of negotiation that is facilitated by a neutral third party - has been that it is a watered-down version of dispute resolution that rarely results in settlement. In more recent years, however, a number of the myths surrounding mediation have been dispelled (at least in the UK) thanks to (i) the introduction of court procedures requiring parties to discuss the mediation option in any event and (ii) the high success rate of mediation (recent statistics suggest that 65 to 85 percent of cases referred to mediation settle at the mediation session).


 

The views expressed in this article are solely the views of the author and not Martindale-Hubbell. This article is intended for informational purposes only and is not legal advice or a substitute for consultation with a licensed legal professional in a particular case or circumstance.




Total Practice Solutions

 
Terms & Conditions | Privacy | Copyright 2008 LexisNexis, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.