Join Matindale-Hubbell Connected



Search Results (1530)

  
Documents on apparel
 

View Page: <<  Prev  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next  >>
Show: results per page
Sort by:
Sponsored Results

HTMLThe Immigration Reform and Control Act & YOUR Business
Timothy D. Ronan, Yvonne E. Tagart; Davis Miles, PLLC;
Legal Alert/Article
August 16, 2011, previously published on August 8, 2011
The Immigration Reform and Control Act, enacted in 1986 (IRCA), made it illegal for employers to knowingly hire unauthorized workers and requires employers to verify that the employees they hire are eligible to work in the United States. The definition of knowingly includes not only actual...

 

HTMLITC Issues Opinion On Remedy, Public Interest, and Bonding In Certain Foam Footwear (337-TA-567)
Lindsay J. Kile, Eric W. Schweibenz; Oblon, Spivak, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, L.L.P.;
Legal Alert/Article
August 15, 2011, previously published on August 11, 2011
Further to our July 20, 2011 post, on August 2, 2011, the International Trade Commission issued its opinion with respect to remedy, public interest, and bonding in Certain Foam Footwear (Inv. No. 337-TA-567).

 

HTMLHow the First Amendment Protects Your Right to Be a Jerk
Lisa Y. Wang; Greenberg Glusker Fields Claman & Machtinger LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
August 11, 2011, previously published on August 8, 2011
Sadly, “shocking” racist or bigoted celebrity tirades no longer make for shocking news. Even if the Constitution can’t protect them in the court of public opinion, celebrities like Mel Gibson, Michael Richards, and Tracy Morgan are lucky enough to live in America, where the First...

 

Adobe PDFGene Patenting: Federal Circuit Upholds Patents to Isolated DNA
Patterson Belknap Webb Tyler LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
August 9, 2011, previously published on August 2011
On Friday, the Federal Circuit issued its highly anticipated decision in Association for Molecular Pathology, et al. v. Myriad Genetics. The Federal Circuit held that isolated DNA sequences (both genomic DNA and cDNA) are patentable subject matter, while Myriad's claims for "comparing" or...

 

HTMLALJ Luckern Grants Motion To Compel In Certain Handbags And Luggage (337-TA-754)
Lindsay J. Kile, Eric W. Schweibenz; Oblon, Spivak, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, L.L.P.;
Legal Alert/Article
August 3, 2011, previously published on August 3, 2011
On July 26, 2011, Chief ALJ Paul J. Luckern issued the public version of Order No. 5 (dated March 30, 2011) in Certain Handbags, Luggage, Accessories, and Packaging Thereof (Inv. No. 337-TA-754). In the Order, ALJ Luckern granted Complainants Louis Vuitton Malletier S.A. and Louis Vuitton U.S....

 

HTMLYSL Fights Back By Seeking To Cancel Louboutin's Red Sole Trademark
Sheppard Mullin Richter Hampton LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
August 2, 2011, previously published on July 29, 2011
As we previously reported here, Christian Louboutin ("Louboutin") filed a lawsuit against Yves Saint Laurent ("YSL") in early April, alleging that YSL and its affiliated companies violated Louboutin's red sole trademark by selling women's shoes with red uppers and outsoles...

 

HTMLNike Calls Illegitimate Goaltending on Point 3’s Attempt to Stuff its Jordan Fly Wade Sneakers
L. Robert Batterman, Robert E. Freeman, Howard L. Ganz, Wayne D. Katz, Joseph M. Leccese, Jonathan H. Oram, Howard Z. Robbins, Bradley I. Ruskin; Proskauer Rose LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
August 1, 2011, previously published on July 2011
Nike’s Jordan Brand basketball shoes have been getting serious air since they were first introduced in 1985. One of the brand’s latest models, the Dwyane Wade-endorsed Jordan Fly Wade, however, faces the threat of being permanently grounded.

 

HTMLALJ Luckern Grants Motion For Summary Determination On Domestic Industry Issues In Certain Handbags And Luggage (337-TA-754)
John F. Presper, Eric W. Schweibenz; Oblon, Spivak, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, L.L.P.;
Legal Alert/Article
July 28, 2011, previously published on July 27, 2011
On July 18, 2011 Chief ALJ Paul J. Luckern issued the public version of Order No. 7 (dated June 7, 2011) in Certain Handbags, Luggage, Accessories, and Packaging Thereof (Inv. No. 337-TA-754). In the Order, ALJ Luckern determined that Complainants Louis Vuitton Malletier S.A. and Louis Vuitton...

 

HTMLKnockout Blow to Knockoffs
Alexandra Kirschbaum, Peter E.J. Wells; McMillan LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
July 21, 2011, previously published on July 2011
In Louis Vuitton and Burberry v Singga Enterprises, the Federal Court has delivered a stern warning to those engaging in counterfeiting luxury goods in Canada by awarding an aggregate of $1.98 million in damages for trade-mark and copyright infringement and a further $0.5 million in punitive...

 

HTMLTenth Circuit Decides that Protective Gear Included in FLSA Exemption for Changing Clothes
Christopher M. McFadden; Ford & Harrison LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
July 11, 2011, previously published on July 7, 2011
Executive Summary: The Tenth Circuit, which includes Utah, Wyoming, Colorado, New Mexico, Kansas, and Oklahoma, decided this week that an employer did not violate the Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA") by failing to pay employees for time spent donning and doffing protective gear. See...

 


View Page: <<  Prev  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next  >>