Search Results (1544)
Documents on apparel
Show: results per page
Sheppard Mullin Richter Hampton LLP;
April 11, 2014, previously published on April 8, 2014Native advertisements represent not only an increasingly popular and effective means of promotion for marketers, it also represents a massive headache for the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”). Native advertising, also known as corporate content or branded journalism, is marketing...
|Prohibiting “Message” Clothing Without Business Reason Violates the NLRA|
Maria Greco Danaher; Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C.;
February 17, 2014, previously published on February 10, 2014The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) recently deemed a car dealership’s prohibition on “pins, insignias, or other message clothing which are not provided to them by the company” overly restrictive and a violation of the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA). Boch Imports, Inc.,...
|Fashion Documentaries: A Fashion Do|
Sheppard Mullin Richter Hampton LLP;
February 3, 2014, previously published on January 14, 2014Since the first major fashion documentary featuring designer Isaac Mizrahi, “Unzipped,” made its debut in 1995, the popularity of fashion documentaries has only gained traction. Within the past five years, a smattering of renowned brands, including Marc Jacobs, Louis Vuitton, and...
|In-House Counsel Should Take Advantage of Amnesty Period for Limited Law License Applicants|
Dentons Canada LLP;
January 31, 2014, previously published on January 23, 2014Are you corporate counsel based in Illinois? Are you admitted to the Illinois bar? If not, are you complying with Supreme Court Rule 716? If not, now is the time for you to act!
|Southern District of New York Deepens Internal Split Over Loophole in Bankruptcy Safe Harbor for Capital Markets Transactions|
Joaquin M. C De Baca, Joel Moss, Brian Trust; Mayer Brown LLP;
January 29, 2014, previously published on January 24, 2014The Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York recently held in Edward S. Weisfelner, as Litigation Trustee of the LB Creditor Trust v. Fund 1., et al. (In re Lyondell Chemical Company, et al.) (“Lyondell”), that section 546(e) of the Bankruptcy Code does not bar fraudulent...
|DC Circuit Reinstates KV Lawsuit Over MAKENA and Compounded 17p in Light of Cook Decision and DQSA|
Kurt R. Karst; Hyman, Phelps & McNamara, P.C.;
January 13, 2014, previously published on January 9, 2014With primary briefing over, and a December 13, 2013 Oral Argument before Judges Griffith, Kavanaugh and Randolph concluded, we were waiting with bated breath for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit to rule on K-V Pharmaceutical Company’s (“KV’s”)...
|Slip and Fall at Grapevine Mills Mall|
Jeffrey H. Rasansky; Rasansky Law Firm;
January 6, 2014Have you been hurt or injured by a slip and fall at Grapevine Mills Mall (located in Grapevine, Texas)? You may be able to recover compensation for your injuries.
|Decision on Opposition Set Aside and Application for Trade-mark Refused|
Borden Ladner Gervais LLP;
December 3, 2013, previously published on November 27, 2013This is an appeal of a decision of the Registrar of Trade-marks (the Registrar) denying the opposition by International Stars to the registration of the trade-mark ZENERGY BY/PUR SIMON CHANGE & Design (the Mark) in association with sport clothing. International Stars alleged confusion between...
|BreathableSacks Choking Hazard Prompts Product Recall|
James P. Nevin; Brayton Purcell, LLP;
November 28, 2013, previously published on November 27, 2013BreathableBaby has issued a recall for 15,000 BreathableSacks, a sleeveless wearable blanket for infants. The blankets were found hazardous after it was discovered that the zipper pull tabs and sliders detatch, posing a choking hazard to infants. According to the US Consumer Product Safety...
|Lack of Evidence of Intent to Use Dooms an “ITU” Trademark Application|
Andrew Baum; Foley & Lardner LLP;
November 4, 2013, previously published on November 1, 2013The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) recently granted summary judgment sustaining an opposition against an application based on intent-to-use (“ITU”) on the sole ground that the applicant had no tangible proof of any genuine intent to use the mark in commerce at the time he filed...