Premier Destination for Sophisticated Buyers of Legal Services
Home > Search Legal Topics > Article Abstract




Join Matindale-Hubbell Connected


Supreme Court Limits CERCLA Arranger Liability and Upholds Apportionment Over Joint & Several Liability


by Sharon R. Newlon View Biography
Tammy L. Helminski View Biography
Dickinson Wright PLLC View Firm Credentials
Detroit Office

June 2, 2009

Previously published on May 2009

In its opinion issued on May 4, 2009 for the consolidated CERCLA cases of Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co, et. al v. United States and Shell Oil Co. v. United States, the Supreme Court limited arranger liability and found the methods of liability apportionment used by the District Court for the Eastern District of California to be reasonable such that joint and several liability did not apply.


 

The views expressed in this article are solely the views of the author and not Martindale-Hubbell. This article is intended for informational purposes only and is not legal advice or a substitute for consultation with a licensed legal professional in a particular case or circumstance.


 

Practice Area Resource Centers
Visit our Practice Area Resource Centers to view practice area specific content compiled from a variety of legal sources. Find related articles, podcasts, industry leader insights and much more. We currently offer the following Practice Areas: Litigation; Intellectual Property; Real Estate; Corporate Law; Criminal Law; Bankruptcy; Immigration; Business Law; Insurance; Taxation; Labor & Employment; Commercial Law; Medical Malpractice; Trusts & Estates; Securities; International Law ; Health Care; Environmental Law; Construction Law; Workers' Compensation





Total Practice Solutions

 

Terms & Conditions | Privacy | Copyright 2009 LexisNexis, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.