Join Matindale-Hubbell Connected



Search Results (4559)

  
Documents on appellate practice
 

View Page: 1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next  >>
Show: results per page
Sort by:
Sponsored Results

HTMLNinth Circuit Reaffirms U.S. Antitrust Laws Apply To International Price-Fixing Cartels
Eric B. Fastiff; Lieff, Cabraser, Heimann & Bernstein, LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
July 30, 2014, previously published on July 11, 2014
In a significant ruling defining the scope of U.S. antitrust laws in our global economy, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the criminal convictions of AU Optronics ("AUO"), one of the world's leading manufacturers of Thin Film Transistor Liquid Crystal Displays...

 

HTMLPay Me Now: Court of Appeal Delivers Lessons on Fiduciary Duties, the Business Judgment Rule, and Executive Compensation
Shane C. D'Souza, Robert A. Glasgow, Elder C. Marques; McCarthy Tétrault LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
July 30, 2014, previously published on July 28, 2014
The business judgment of directors setting executive compensation was front and centre in the Ontario Court of Appeal’s recent decision in Unique Broadband Systems, Inc. (Re), 2014 ONCA 538 (UBS). Although the decision is based on unique underlying facts, it offers several important lessons...

 

HTMLIllinois Discovery Rule - Onus on the Insured to Know the Terms and Liability Limits of their Policy
Gabriel R. Judd; Johnson & Bell, Ltd.;
Legal Alert/Article
July 29, 2014, previously published on July 2014
The discovery rule is an equitable exception that tolls the statute of limitations period until the plaintiff discovers, or has reason to discover, the cause of action. Knox College v. Celotex Corp., 88 Ill. 2d 407 (1981). In cases applying the discovery rule, courts hold that the statute of...

 

HTMLMammoet v. Edmonton: The Alberta Court of Appeal Clarifies Judicial Review on Bylaw Validity
Terence Dalgleish; Davis LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
July 29, 2014, previously published on July 24, 2014
On July 10, 2014, the Alberta Court of Appeal released Mammoet 13220-33 Street NE Limited v Edmonton (City), 2014 ABCA 229, a decision dismissing the City’s appeal of a dismissal of a summary judgment application. This decision clarified the law surrounding the six-month limitation period for...

 

HTMLThe Affordable Care Act—Countdown to Compliance for Employers, Week 22: Charting the Future of the Premium Subsidies (and Employer Penalties): Halbig v. Burwell and King v. Burwell
Roy M. Albert, Alden J. Bianchi, Stephen M. Weiner; Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.;
Legal Alert/Article
July 29, 2014, previously published on July 28, 2014
On July 22, 2014, two federal appellate courts issued conflicting decisions, within hours of each other, regarding the IRS final rule published on May 23, 2012 (the “IRS Rule”), intended to implement the exchange-related tax credit provisions of the Affordable Care Act...

 

HTMLIPR Spotlight Series: What to Do When the PTAB Denies Your Petition to Institute IPR
Meaghan Hemmings Kent, Fabian M. Koenigbauer, Carly S. Levin, Steven J. Schwarz; Venable LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
July 28, 2014, previously published on July 24, 2014
Inter partes review (IPR) before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) became available on September 16, 2012 as a post-grant review procedure to challenge the patentability of issued claims based on prior art patents and publications. To help navigate the uncharted waters of this procedure,...

 

HTMLFederal Circuit Reverses Termination Of Enforcement Proceedings In Align Technology Appeal (2013-1240, 1363)
Lisa M. Mandrusiak, Eric W. Schweibenz; Oblon, Spivak, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, L.L.P.;
Legal Alert/Article
July 28, 2014, previously published on July 25, 2014
On July 18, 2014, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued its opinion in Align Technology, Inc. v. ITC (2013-1240, 1363). This was an appeal from the International Trade Commission’s (“the Commission”) decision that it could review the ALJ’s Order...

 

HTML$30, Four Opinions, and No Decision: The Province and Duty to Say What the Law Probably Is
Kellen C. Kasper; Foley & Lardner LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
July 26, 2014, previously published on July 25, 2014
Federal appellate courts ordinarily grant en banc hearings or rehearings only when “(1) en banc consideration is necessary to secure or maintain uniformity of the court’s decisions; or (2) the proceeding involves a question of exceptional importance.” Fed. R. App. P. 35(a). So,...

 

Adobe PDFUS Appellate Court Clarifies Due Process Rights for Parties Subject to CFIUS Review of Foreign Investments
Timothy J. Keeler, Simeon M. Kriesberg, Kelsey Rule, Margaret-Rose Sales; Mayer Brown LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
July 26, 2014, previously published on July 22, 2014
The US Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit has reversed a lower court’s ruling and held that companies undergoing review by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS or the Committee) have a due process right to notice of unclassified evidence and an opportunity to rebut...

 

HTMLRegistration for JACK BLACK allowed on appeal
Adrian J. Howard, Beverley Moore, Chantal Saunders, Ryan Steeves; Borden Ladner Gervais LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
July 25, 2014, previously published on July 23, 2014
The applicant for the registration of the trade-mark JACK BLACK has won before the Federal Court. The application is for wares relating to personal care and grooming products, including lotions and skin preparations, shaving gels and deodorants, among others. The mark was found to have been used...

 


View Page: 1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next  >>