Home > Legal Library > Article




Join Matindale-Hubbell Connected


ALJ Bullock Denies Respondents’ Motion for Summary Determination in Certain Tires (337-TA-894)




by:
Katherine Cappaert
Eric W. Schweibenz
Oblon, Spivak, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, L.L.P. - Alexandria Office

 
January 17, 2014

Previously published on January 15, 2014

On January 13, 2014, ALJ Charles E. Bullock issued Order No. 27 in Certain Tires and Products Containing Same (Inv. No. 337-TA-894).

According to the Order, Respondents South China Tire and Rubber Co., Ltd. and Guangzhou South China Tire & Rubber Co., Ltd. (collectively, “Respondents”) moved for summary determination of patent misuse by Complainants and an order terminating the Investigation as to Respondents as a consequence of Complainants’ patent misuse.

After reviewing the submitted pleadings and exhibits, ALJ Bullock found that because genuine issues of material fact may remain, there was no good cause to grant the motion in lieu of a trial of all issues on the merits. Accordingly, ALJ Bullock denied Respondents’ motion.



 

The views expressed in this document are solely the views of the author and not Martindale-Hubbell. This document is intended for informational purposes only and is not legal advice or a substitute for consultation with a licensed legal professional in a particular case or circumstance.
 

View More Library Documents By...

 
Author
 
Katherine Cappaert
Eric W. Schweibenz
Practice Area
 
Intellectual Property
 
Oblon, Spivak, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, L.L.P. Overview