Join Matindale-Hubbell Connected



Search Results (2672)

  
Documents on biotech life sciences
 

View Page: Prev  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next  >>
Show: results per page
Sort by:
Sponsored Results

HTMLThe Hare Loses Steam - Patent Litigation Reform Law Unlikely This Year
Ann G. Fort; Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
June 6, 2014, previously published on May 23, 2014
Efforts by the U.S. Senate to pass an alternative to the Innovation Act, which aims to reform abusive patent litigation, have stalled. Sen. Patrick Leahy, who is leading the effort, has announced that his committee is tabling that work until the interested parties reach a bipartisan compromise....

 

HTMLFederal Circuit Vacates Infringement of Braintree SUPREP Patent
Courtenay C. Brinckerhoff; Foley & Lardner LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
June 6, 2014, previously published on May 29, 2014
In a divided opinion issued in Braintree Labs., Inc. v. Novel Labs., Inc., the Federal Circuit reversed the district court on one of two challenged claim construction issues and vacated the district court’s finding of infringement to remand for further factual findings. When no judge agrees...

 

HTMLFTC PAE Study Would Collect Detailed Confidential Business Information From 25 PAEs
Simon J. Elliott; Foley & Lardner LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
May 30, 2014, previously published on May 22, 2014
In the May 19, 2014 Federal Register, the Federal Trade Commission published a Notice and Request for Comments concerning its proposal ”to collect information about Patent Assertion Entity (‘‘PAE’’) organization, structure, economic relationships, and activity,...

 

HTMLPublic Comments on UPSTO Proposed Attributable Ownership Rules
Simon J. Elliott; Foley & Lardner LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
May 30, 2014, previously published on May 27, 2014
The USPTO proposed attributable ownership rules would require the public disclosure of the “attributable owner” of patent applications and patents. In this article, I outlined some of my concerns with the proposed rules. Here, I provide a review of some of the written comments submitted...

 

HTMLUPDATE: The Hare Loses Steam - Patent Litigation Reform Law Unlikely This Year
Ann G. Fort; Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
May 27, 2014, previously published on May 23, 2014
Efforts by the U.S. Senate to pass an alternative to the Innovation Act, which aims to reform abusive patent litigation, have stalled. Sen. Patrick Leahy, who is leading the effort, has announced that his committee is tabling that work until the interested parties reach a bipartisan compromise....

 

HTMLKey Questions to Ask When Preparing a Data Breach Response Plan (Part II)
Peter I. Sanborn; Foley & Lardner LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
May 22, 2014, previously published on May 16, 2014
Following up on last week’s post, we return to the wide range of questions about a company’s operations that can guide a team building a data breach response plan to cover many of the risks encountered in the wake of a breach.

 

HTMLFederal Circuit Keeps Burden of Patent Clarity on Applicants on Issues of Patent Indefiniteness
Courtenay C. Brinckerhoff; Foley & Lardner LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
May 22, 2014, previously published on May 8, 2014
In In re Packard, the Federal Circuit affirmed the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) decision upholding the rejection of Packard’s claims for indefiniteness. The per curiam decision approaches the issue from the perspective of the USPTO’s examination function, while steering...

 

HTMLUSPTO Finally Updates Patent Term Adjustment Calculator - Sort of
Courtenay C. Brinckerhoff; Foley & Lardner LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
May 22, 2014, previously published on May 20, 2014
In a Federal Register Notice issued May 15, 2014, the USPTO announced that its Patent Term Adjustment (PTA) calculator finally has been updated to implement the changes to the PTA statute embodied in the Technical Corrections Act which was enacted on January 13, 2013, but has not yet been updated...

 

HTMLUpdate From the May 9, 2014 USPTO Patent Eligibility Guidelines Forum
Courtenay C. Brinckerhoff; Foley & Lardner LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
May 22, 2014, previously published on May 12, 2014
On May 9, 2014, the USPTO hosted a forum to receive public feedback on the patent subject matter eligibility guidance for examiners circulated on March 4, 2014. The USPTO heard formal presentations from ten speakers (including myself) and comments from audience members. Most speakers suggested...

 

HTMLStakeholders Testify on Patent Subject Matter Eligibility
Leon Y. Lum; Foley & Lardner LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
May 16, 2014, previously published on May 15, 2014
On May 9, 2014, the USPTO held a public forum on the USPTO’s new patent subject matter eligibility guidance (the “Guidance”). In promoting the forum, the USPTO stated that it wished to “to receive public feedback from organizations and individuals on the Guidance.” The...

 


View Page: Prev  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next  >>