Join Matindale-Hubbell Connected



Search Results (2420)

  
Documents on civil rights
 

View Page: Prev  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next  >>
Show: results per page
Sort by:
Sponsored Results

HTMLEffective July 1, 2014: Caps To Be Placed on Non-Monetary Damages Sought Under the THRA, TDA, and TPPA
Charlotte S. Wolfe; Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C.;
Legal Alert/Article
June 5, 2014, previously published on May 28, 2014
Tennessee’s governor just signed a highly significant employment litigation reform bill that will benefit employers throughout the state. The new law applies to all causes of action starting July 1, 2014. The bill places caps on the availability of non-monetary damages (pain, suffering,...

 

HTML“Men’s Day” Customer Appreciation Event Discriminatory
Meaghan McWhinnie, Meaghan McWhinnie, Daniel Pugen, Daniel Pugen; McCarthy Tétrault LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
June 3, 2014, previously published on May 21, 2014
In McConaghie v. Systemgroup Consulting Inc., 2014 HRTO 295, the Ontario Human Rights Tribunal (HRTO) found that an employer discriminated against a female employee on the basis of sex by sponsoring a customer appreciation event that was for men only. The HRTO also found that the employer...

 

HTMLThis Week in Racism (Part 2): Macklemore
Kohrman Jackson Krantz PLL;
Legal Alert/Article
May 29, 2014, previously published on May 20, 2014
Last night, I caught up on Louie on my DVR. At the end of the episode, Louis CK made the following observation about love:

 

HTMLWhen Is a Partner Not a Partner? Control, Dependency and the Lurking Spectre of a Duty of "Good Faith"
Julia Bennett, Alexandra Cocks, Jordanna Cytrynbaum; McCarthy Tétrault LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
May 29, 2014, previously published on May 27, 2014
On May 22, the Supreme Court of Canada upheld the British Columbia Court of Appeal’s decision that an equity partner in a law firm was not an employee for the purposes of the B.C. Human Rights Code (Code).

 

HTMLThis Week in Racism
Kohrman Jackson Krantz PLL;
Legal Alert/Article
May 29, 2014, previously published on May 19, 2014
If you’re a public figure and you’re caught calling the President “that f—king n-----,” do you:

 

HTML“Control and Dependency Define the Essence of Employment”, SCC Rules
Ryley Mennie; McCarthy Tétrault LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
May 29, 2014, previously published on May 22, 2014
The Supreme Court of Canada released a highly-anticipated decision for professional partnerships, employers and employees today in McCormick v Fasken Martineau DuMoulin LLP. We commented previously on the facts of the case and the history of proceedings to the British Columbia Court of Appeal.

 

HTMLSee No Evil, Hear No Evil: See No Defense for Third-Party Harassment?
Kevin E. Hyde; Foley & Lardner LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
May 22, 2014, previously published on May 19, 2014
It is rare that a distinguished federal appellate court invokes the “See No Evil, Hear No Evil” approach to deciding a case, but this is exactly what happened in a recent decision involving a North Carolina based tile and stone distributor. The case confronted the court with the...

 

HTMLFamily Status and Childcare Obligations: The Federal Court of Appeal Weighs In
Kate McNeill-Keller; McCarthy Tétrault LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
May 20, 2014, previously published on May 15, 2014
In recent years, courts, tribunals and arbitrators have considered the obligations of employers when dealing with family-related needs, including an employee's childcare obligations. As all employees have family responsibilities and many have childcare responsibilities, this topic continues to be...

 

HTMLMaryland General Assembly Employment Legislation Update
Shawe Rosenthal LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
May 16, 2014, previously published on April 30, 2014
During the Maryland General Assembly session that ended in April 2014, Shawe Rosenthal lawyers again worked with the Maryland Chamber of Commerce to oppose or moderate legislation affecting employers. Several employment bills were passed and have been or are expected to be signed by the Governor.

 

HTMLIs Your Business At Risk for Damages and Civil Money Penalties Based on Violations Stemming from Improper I-9 and E-Verify Procedures?
Mary E. Pivec; Ford & Harrison LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
May 16, 2014, previously published on May 15, 2014
Executive Summary: The Office of Special Counsel for Immigration-Related Discrimination (OSC) within the Civil Rights Division of the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) has made it a priority to pursue employers who allegedly misuse or abuse access to the E-Verify program and unlawfully discriminate...

 


View Page: Prev  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next  >>