Premier Destination for Sophisticated Buyers of Legal Services
Home > Legal Library > Abstract




Join Matindale-Hubbell Connected


United States Supreme Court to Review Availability of 'Class Action Arbitration' Where the Arbitration Clause is Silent


by Dana H. Freyer
John L. Gardiner
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
New York Office

Lea Haber Kuck View Biography
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP View Firm Credentials
New York Office

Marco E. Schnabl
Timothy G. Nelson
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
New York Office

August 5, 2009

Previously published on June 18, 2009

On Monday, June 15, 2009, the United States Supreme Court announced that it would review the decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in Stolt-Nielsen S.A. v. AnimalFeeds International Corp., 548 F.3d 85 (2d Cir. 2008), a case involving "class action arbitration."


 

The views expressed in this document are solely the views of the author and not Martindale-Hubbell. This document is intended for informational purposes only and is not legal advice or a substitute for consultation with a licensed legal professional in a particular case or circumstance.


 

Practice Area Resource Centers
Visit our Practice Area Resource Centers to view practice area specific content compiled from a variety of legal sources. Find related articles, podcasts, industry leader insights and much more. We currently offer the following Practice Areas: Litigation; Intellectual Property; Real Estate; Corporate Law; Criminal Law; Bankruptcy; Immigration; Business Law; Insurance; Taxation; Labor & Employment; Commercial Law; Medical Malpractice; Trusts & Estates; Securities; International Law ; Health Care; Environmental Law; Construction Law; Workers' Compensation





Total Practice Solutions

 

Terms & Conditions | Privacy | Copyright 2009 LexisNexis, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.