martindale.com
Legal Library
|
United States Supreme Court to Review Availability of 'Class Action Arbitration' Where the Arbitration Clause is Silent by Dana H. Freyer
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP - New York Office
John L. Gardiner
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP - New York Office
Lea Haber Kuck
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP - New York Office
Marco E. Schnabl
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP - New York Office
Timothy G. Nelson
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP - New York Office
|
|
June 24, 2009
Previously published on June 18, 2009
On Monday, June 15, 2009, the United States Supreme Court announced that it would review the decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in Stolt-Nielsen S.A. v. AnimalFeeds International Corp., 548 F.3d 85 (2d Cir. 2008), a case involving "class action arbitration."
|
The views expressed in this document are solely the views of the author and not Martindale-Hubbell. This document is intended for informational purposes only and is not legal advice or a substitute for consultation with a licensed legal professional in a particular case or circumstance. |
| | View More Library Documents By... | | | |
| | | | Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP Overview |
Practice Area Resource Centers
|
|