martindale.com Legal Library
|
FCC Seeks Comment on a Broadband Clearinghouse |
October 20, 2009
Previously published on October 9, 2009
In its development of a National Broadband Plan, the FCC is seeking comment on whether to create a broadband clearinghouse for easy access to useful broadband information. Comments are due Nov. 16, 2009. The FCC seeks comment on the following issues:
- the concept of a broadband clearinghouse for best practices and whether the FCC or another federal agency should create a clearinghouse;
- what the primary purposes of a broadband clearinghouse are;
- type of content that a broadband clearinghouse would contain;
- whether there are current clearinghouses that would serve as a good model;
- the features that a clearinghouse should have;
- what types of entities (local governments, broadband providers, broadband-adoption-focused organizations, scholars) would most benefit from a broadband clearinghouse and how;
- what audiences would benefit most from a clearinghouse;
- whether the clearinghouse entity should engage in outreach or information sharing beyond those in a Web-based, electronic format;
- how could the clearinghouse be publicized;
- how a clearinghouse can be most useful;
- how can a clearinghouse identify or feature truly-effective broadband practices and avoid “bad” practices and data that may end up in the clearinghouse;
- how should information in the clearinghouse be structured and categorized to maximize the extent to which it is comparable and searchable;
- what editorial or other resources are necessary to ensure that a clearinghouse contains accurate and updated information;
- whether the manager should actively control or filter what data and best practices are allowed into the clearinghouse;
- how can the clearinghouse leverage public participation to obtain best managerial outcomes;
- whether the clearinghouse should have a retention schedule for contributed data; and
- who should update and maintain a broadband clearinghouse.
|
The views expressed in this document are solely the views of the author and not Martindale-Hubbell. This document is intended for informational purposes only and is not legal advice or a substitute for consultation with a licensed legal professional in a particular case or circumstance. |
Practice Area Resource Centers
|
|