martindale.com
Legal Library
|
Search Results (1596) Documents on computers office equipment Show: results per page Sort by:  | Federal Circuit Affirms in Ninestar Appeal (2009-1549)
Lisa M. Mandrusiak, Eric W. Schweibenz; Oblon, Spivak, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, L.L.P.;
Legal Alert/Article February 13, 2012, previously published on February 10, 2012 On February 8, 2012, the Federal Circuit issued a precedential opinion in Ninestar Tech. Co., Ltd., v. ITC (2009-1549). This was an appeal from the International Trade Commission’s (“Commission”) assessment of a civil penalty against Ninestar Technology Co. Ltd., Ninestar...
| | MT.Derm Files New 337 Complaint Regarding Certain Ink Application Devices
Alexander B. Englehart, Eric W. Schweibenz; Oblon, Spivak, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, L.L.P.;
Legal Alert/Article February 2, 2012, previously published on February 1, 2012 On January 30, 2012, MT.Derm GmbH of Germany (“MT.Derm”) and Nouveau Cosmetique USA Inc. of Orlando, Florida (collectively, the “Complainants”) filed a complaint requesting that the ITC commence an investigation pursuant to Section 337.
| | Canon Files New 337 Complaint Regarding Certain Toner Cartridges
Alexander B. Englehart, Eric W. Schweibenz; Oblon, Spivak, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, L.L.P.;
Legal Alert/Article January 27, 2012, previously published on January 25, 2012 On January 23, 2012, Canon Inc. of Japan, Canon U.S.A., Inc. of Lake Success, New York, and Canon Virginia, Inc. of Newport News, Virginia (“CVI”) (collectively, “Canon”) filed a complaint requesting that the ITC commence an investigation pursuant to Section 337.
| | ALJ Rogers Sets Target Date In Certain Dynamic Random Access Memory Devices (337-TA-821)
Eric W. Schweibenz; Oblon, Spivak, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, L.L.P.;
Legal Alert/Article January 10, 2012, previously published on January 9, 2012 Further to our December 21, 2011 post, on January 4, 2012, ALJ Robert K. Rogers, Jr. issued Order No. 3 in Certain Dynamic Random Access Memory Devices, and Products Containing Same (Inv. No. 337-TA-821).
| | Up In Smoke
Gary A. Watt; Archer Norris A Professional Law Corporation;
Legal Alert/Article January 6, 2012, previously published on January 4, 2012 A recent decision by the Third Appellate District is a reminder of the opportunity and the limits of a motion for judgment on the pleadings. The case is Collins v. eMachines, Inc.
|  | How to Craft Computer Policies on Personal Emails and Surfing
Nicole K. Skuggedal; Lawson Lundell LLP;
Legal Alert/Article January 5, 2012, previously published by Small Business Profit Guide on December 2011 This article discusses employee privacy rights for information stored on work computers and the importance of adopting a well-conceived policy on computer usage. The best way to protect your company from being found in violation of employee privacy is to adopt a well-conceived policy on computer...
| | General Court Confirms Commission Decision Not To Investigate Cartridge Market For Ink Jet Printers
Werner Berg, Miklos Mudrony; Crowell & Moring;
Legal Alert/Article December 12, 2011, previously published on December 9, 2011 On 24 November 2011, the General Court of the European Union ("GC") in Luxemburg confirmed a decision of the European Commission ("Commission") not to open a formal antitrust investigation against Hewlett Packard, Lexmark, Canon and Epson. The case is interesting because, inter...
| | ALJ Gildea Grants-In-Part Motion To Strike Contentions Regarding Conception Dates, Denies Motion To Strike Contentions Regarding Domestic Industry, And Denies Motion To Strike Expert Testimony In Certain Set-Top Boxes (337-TA-761)
John F. Presper, Eric W. Schweibenz; Oblon, Spivak, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, L.L.P.;
Legal Alert/Article December 5, 2011, previously published on December 1, 2011 On November 28, 2011, ALJ E. James Gildea issued the public version of Order No. 24 (dated November 18, 2011), Order No. 27 (dated November 21, 2011) and Order No. 28 (dated November 22, 2011) in Certain Set-Top Boxes, and Hardware and Software Components Thereof (Inv. No. 337-TA-761).
| | If You Build It, Will the Lawyers Come? 3D Printing and Copyright Infringement
Jake Linford; Pattishall McAuliffe Newbury Hilliard Geraldson LLP;
Legal Alert/Article November 22, 2011, previously published on November 18, 2011 As I previewed earlier this week, I want to talk about the copyright implications for 3D printers. A 3D printer is a device that can reproduce a 3-dimensional object by spraying layers of plastic, metal, or ceramic into a given shape. (I imagine the process smelling like those Mold-a-Rama plastic...
| | ITC Issues Final Determination Of Violation And General Exclusion Order In Certain Toner Cartridges (337-TA-740)
Alexander B. Englehart, Eric W. Schweibenz; Oblon, Spivak, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, L.L.P.;
Legal Alert/Article October 3, 2011, previously published on September 30, 2011 On September 27, 2011, the International Trade Commission (the “Commission”) issued a notice determining to terminate the investigation in Certain Toner Cartridges and Components Thereof (Inv. No. 337-TA-740) with a finding of a violation of Section 337. The Commission further...
|
|