Join Matindale-Hubbell Connected



Search Results (1657)

  
Documents on computers office equipment
 

View Page: <<  Prev  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next  >>
Show: results per page
Sort by:
Sponsored Results

HTMLALJ Rogers Issues Initial Determination In Certain Printing And Imaging Devices (337-TA-690)
Eric W. Schweibenz; Oblon, Spivak, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, L.L.P.;
Legal Alert/Article
September 30, 2010, previously published on September 27, 2010
On September 23, 2010, ALJ Robert K. Rogers, Jr. issued a notice regarding the Initial Determination (“ID”) in Certain Printing and Imaging Devices and Components Thereof (Inv. No. 337-TA-690).

 

HTMLALJ Rogers Denies Motions For Reconsideration In Certain Notebook Computer Products (337-TA-705)
John F. Presper, Eric W. Schweibenz; Oblon, Spivak, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, L.L.P.;
Legal Alert/Article
September 22, 2010, previously published on September 21, 2010
On September 16, 2010, ALJ Robert K. Rogers, Jr. issued Order No. 18 in Certain Notebook Computer Products and Components Thereof (Inv. No. 337-TA-705). In the Order, ALJ Rogers denied motions filed by Respondents Wistron Corporation, Wistron InfoComm (Texas) Corporation, and Wistron InfoComm...

 

HTMLALJ Essex Sets Target Date in Certain Inkjet Ink Supplies (337-TA-730)
Eric W. Schweibenz; Oblon, Spivak, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, L.L.P.;
Legal Alert/Article
September 17, 2010, previously published on September 15, 2010
Further to our July 29, 2010 post, on September 10, 2010, ALJ Theodore R. Essex issued Order No. 3: Setting the Target Date and Date for Submission of Proposed Procedural Schedule in Certain Inkjet Ink Supplies And Components Thereof (Inv. No. 337-TA-730).

 

HTMLALJ Gildea Sets Procedural Schedule In Certain Toner Cartridges (337-TA-731)
Eric W. Schweibenz; Oblon, Spivak, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, L.L.P.;
Legal Alert/Article
September 15, 2010, previously published on September 14, 2010
On September 7, 2010, ALJ E. James Gildea issued Order No. 5: Setting Procedural Schedule in Certain Toner Cartridges and Components Thereof (Inv. No. 337-TA-731).

 

Adobe PDFFederal Circuit Issues Major Opinion on Patent Misuse Doctrine In Princo Corp.
Kaye Scholer LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
September 8, 2010, previously published on September 1, 2010
On August 30, 2010, in its en banc decision issued in Princo Corp. v. International Trade Commission, the Federal Circuit arguably narrowed the application of the judicially created doctrine of patent misuse in the licensing context. A finding of patent misuse by the patentee makes the...

 

HTMLITC Issues Public Version of Opinion in Certain Adjustable Keyboard Support Systems (337-TA-670)
Eric W. Schweibenz; Oblon, Spivak, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, L.L.P.;
Legal Alert/Article
August 27, 2010, previously published on August 18, 2010
On August 13, 2010, the International Trade Commission issued the public version of its opinion reversing Chief ALJ Paul J. Luckern’s February 23, 2010 Final Initial Determination (“ID”) in Certain Adjustable Keyboard Support Systems and Components Thereof (Inv. No. 337-TA-670). ...

 

HTMLALJ Gildea Sets Target Date In Certain Toner Cartridges (337-TA-731)
Eric W. Schweibenz; Oblon, Spivak, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, L.L.P.;
Legal Alert/Article
August 18, 2010, previously published on August 4, 2010
Further to our July 28, 2010 post, on August 2, 2010, ALJ E. James Gildea issued Order No. 2: Notice of Ground Rules and Setting Target Date and Date for Submission of Proposed Procedural Schedule in Certain Toner Cartridges and Components Thereof (Inv. No. 337-TA-731).

 

Adobe PDFFTC Settles High-Profile Unfair Competition Case Against Intel: Agreement Includes Restrictions on Various Commercial Practices
Scott Martin, Irving Scher; Greenberg Traurig, LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
August 18, 2010, previously published on August 5, 2010
On August 4, 2010, the Federal Trade Commission announced a proposed settlement (approved by a 4-0 vote, with Commissioner Kovacic recused, and subject to public comment) with Intel Corp. of charges of anticompetitive conduct in violation of Section 5 of the FTC Act. The FTC has exclusive...

 

HTMLFTC Settles Charges That Intel Violated Section 5 of the FTC Act
Robert A. Lipstein, Robert B. McNary, Andrew Slade, Michael G. Van Arsdall; Crowell & Moring LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
August 18, 2010, previously published on August 4, 2010
On August 4, 2010, the Federal Trade Commission approved a proposed consent order with Intel. This settlement resolved FTC allegations that Intel violated Section 5 of the FTC Act when it used de facto exclusive dealing arrangements and market share deals to induce original equipment manufacturers...

 

HTMLITC Institutes Investigation (337-TA-731) Regarding Certain Toner Cartridges
Eric W. Schweibenz; Oblon, Spivak, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, L.L.P.;
Legal Alert/Article
August 18, 2010, previously published on July 28, 2010
On July 26, 2010, the U.S. International Trade Commission issued a press release announcing that it voted to institute an investigation of Certain Toner Cartridges and Components Thereof (Inv. No. 337-TA-731).

 


View Page: <<  Prev  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next  >>