Search Results (1661)
Documents on computers office equipment
Show: results per page
|ITC Terminates Investigation With Finding Of No Section 337 Violation In Certain Computers and Computer Peripheral Devices (337-TA-841)|
Eric W. Schweibenz; Oblon, Spivak, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, L.L.P.;
January 6, 2014, previously published on January 3, 2014On December 19, 2013, the International Trade Commission (the “Commission”) issued a notice terminating the investigation with a finding of no violation of Section 337 in Certain Computers and Computer Peripheral Devices and Components Thereof and Products Containing the Same (Inv. No....
|“The Digital and Internet Age Meets the Law of Search and Seizure” As the SCC Clarifies the Law on Search Warrants and Computers in R v. Vu|
Justin H. Nasseri; McCarthy Tétrault LLP;
November 20, 2013, previously published on November 19, 2013The Supreme Court of Canada recently released a unanimous judgment in R. v. Vu, 2013 SCC 60, in which it ruled that authorities must obtain specific authorization in a search warrant in order to search computers located on premises covered by the warrant. In this case, the police collected...
|New Obstacles Are Raised to Protecting Computer-Related Inventions|
Bruce D. Sunstein; Sunstein Kann Murphy & Timbers LLP;
October 30, 2013, previously published on October 25, 2013Recent court decisions make it more challenging to protect computer-related inventions with patents. On September 5, in the case of Accenture v. Guidewire, the Federal Circuit issued a split decision holding that a computer-related invention was not eligible to be patented.
|HR Manager Hit with Large Damage Award|
Kaufman Canoles A Professional Corporation;
October 1, 2013, previously published on Fall 2013Tech Systems, Inc. ("TSI") is a woman-owned small business located in Alexandria, Virginia. Shortly after management counseled their Human Resources Manager, Lovelen Pyles, about her work performance, the head of TSI’s IT Department discovered that someone had compromised the secure...
|The Third Circuit Holds TCPA Permits Revocation of Prior Express Consent at Any Point After It Is Given|
Hinshaw Culbertson LLP;
September 26, 2013, previously published on September 16, 2013The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit recently became the first appellate court to hold that the Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991 (TCPA), 47 U.S.C. § 227 et al., permits a consumer to revoke prior express consent to be contacted on his or her cellular telephone line via an...
|ITC Issues Public Version of Opinion in Certain Toner Cartridges (337-TA-829)|
Lisa M. Mandrusiak, Eric W. Schweibenz; Oblon, Spivak, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, L.L.P.;
August 7, 2013, previously published on August 5, 2013On July 29, 2013, the International Trade Commission (the “Commission”) issued the public version of its opinion on remedy and bond in Certain Toner Cartridges and Components Thereof (Inv. No. 337-TA-829).
|Convolve, Inc. v. Compaq Computer Corp.: Federal Circuit Rules on Trade Secret Protection Loss Due to Noncompliance with Confidential Marking Requirement of NDAs|
Alston Bird LLP;
July 12, 2013, previously published on July 11, 2013In Convolve, Inc. v. Compaq Computer Corp., No. 2012-1074, 2013 WL 3285331 (Fed. Cir. July 1, 2013), the Federal Circuit held a trade secret will lose its trade secret protection, at the moment of disclosure, if the disclosing party fails to comply with the confidential marking requirement as set...
|ALJ Pender Denies Motion Seeking To Preclude Evidence In Certain Electronic Devices, Including Mobile Phones And Tablet Computers (337-TA-847)|
Eric W. Schweibenz, Thomas C. Yebernetsky; Oblon, Spivak, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, L.L.P.;
June 10, 2013, previously published on June 7, 2013On May 29, 2013, ALJ Thomas B. Pender issued Order No. 18 (dated May 28, 2013) in Certain Electronic Devices, Including Mobile Phones and Tablet Computers, and Components Thereof (Inv. No. 337-TA-847).
|ALJ Shaw Grants Motion To Quash In Certain Microprocessors (337-TA-781)|
John F. Presper; Oblon, Spivak, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, L.L.P.;
May 10, 2013, previously published on May 7, 2013On April 19, 2013, ALJ David P. Shaw issued the public version of Order No. 50 (dated August 9, 2012) granting Complainant X2Y Attenuator (“X2Y”) and non-parties Messrs. Draganic and Wish’s motion to quash subpoenas duces tecum and ad testificandum issued at the request of...
|FTC Updates Dot Com Disclosures Guide|
Andrew B. Lustigman; Olshan Frome Wolosky LLP;
April 1, 2013, previously published on March 2013On March 12, 2013, the Federal Trade Commission released an update of its guidance known as Dot Com Disclosures, which was first released in 2000. The revised guidance, .com Disclosures: How to Make Effective Disclosures in Digital Advertising (the “Guidance”), is intended to address...