Join Matindale-Hubbell Connected



Search Results (1657)

  
Documents on computers office equipment
 

View Page: Prev  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next  >>
Show: results per page
Sort by:
Sponsored Results

HTMLITC Decides To Review In Part Initial Determination In Certain Ink Cartridges With Printheads (337-TA-723)
Alexander E. Gasser; Oblon, Spivak, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, L.L.P.;
Legal Alert/Article
August 18, 2011, previously published on August 16, 2011
On August 11, 2011, the International Trade Commission (the “Commission”) issued a notice determining to review in part an Initial Determination (“ID”) issued by ALJ Robert K. Rogers on June 10, 2011 finding a violation of Section 337 in Certain Inkjet Cartridges with...

 

HTMLALJ Rogers Issues Public Version of Initial Determination in Certain Inkjet Cartridges with Printheads (337-TA-723)
Andrew K. Beverina, Eric W. Schweibenz; Oblon, Spivak, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, L.L.P.;
Legal Alert/Article
August 17, 2011, previously published on August 12, 2011
On August 4, 2011, ALJ Rogers issued the public version of his Initial Determination (“ID”) (dated June 10, 2011) in Certain Inkjet Cartridges with Printheads and Components Thereof (Inv. No. 337-TA-723).

 

HTMLITC Issues Seizure And Forfeiture Order In Certain Inkjet Ink Supplies (337-TA-691)
Eric W. Schweibenz; Oblon, Spivak, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, L.L.P.;
Legal Alert/Article
August 11, 2011, previously published on August 8, 2011
On August 2, 2011, the ITC issued a Seizure and Forfeiture Order in Certain Inkjet Ink Supplies and Components Thereof (Inv. No. 337-TA-691).

 

HTMLALJ Bullock Sets Procedural Schedule In Certain Microprocessors (337-TA-781)
Eric W. Schweibenz; Oblon, Spivak, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, L.L.P.;
Legal Alert/Article
August 5, 2011, previously published on August 4, 2011
Further to our June 30, 2011 and July 1, 2011 posts, on August 2, 2011, ALJ Charles E. Bullock issued Order No. 5: Setting the Procedural Schedule in Certain Microprocessors, Components Thereof, and Products Containing Same (Inv. No. 337-TA-781).

 

HTMLALJ Bullock Sets 18-Month Target Date In Certain Universal Serial Bus (“USB”) Portable Storage Devices, Including USB Flash Drives (337-TA-789)
Eric W. Schweibenz; Oblon, Spivak, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, L.L.P.;
Legal Alert/Article
August 5, 2011, previously published on August 3, 2011
Further to our July 15, 2011 post, on August 2, 2011, ALJ Charles E. Bullock issued Order No. 5 in Certain Universal Serial Bus (“USB”) Portable Storage Devices, Including USB Flash Drives and Components Thereof (Inv. No. 337-TA-789).

 

HTMLThe Dangers Of Personal Use On Employer-Provided Laptops and Smartphones
Clarence L. Bennett, Justin Wies; Stewart McKelvey;
Legal Alert/Article
May 11, 2011, previously published on Spring 2011
In a recent case that went before the Ontario Court of Appeal, the court held that employees have a right to a reasonable expectation of privacy when using laptops, smartphones, or other computer devices belonging to their employer that they are allowed to take home with them outside of regular...

 

HTMLALJ Charneski Denies Motion to Amend Response to Complaint in Certain Personal Data and Mobile Communications Devices (337-TA-710)
John F. Presper, Eric W. Schweibenz; Oblon, Spivak, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, L.L.P.;
Legal Alert/Article
March 30, 2011, previously published on March 28, 2011
On March 22, 2011, ALJ Carl C. Charneski issued the public version of Order No. 91 (dated February 17, 2011) denying Respondents HTC Corp, HTC America, Inc., and Exedea, Inc.’s (collectively, “HTC”) motion for leave to amend their response to the complaint filed by Apple Inc. and...

 

HTMLIf Speech is Silver, then Silence is Golden?
Kara C. White; McCumber, Daniels, Buntz, Hartig & Puig, P.A.;
Legal Alert/Article
February 24, 2011, previously published by The Benchmark on First Quarter 2011
In September of 2010, the Pennsylvania Superior Court in Barrick v. Holy Spirit Hospital, 2010 WL 3584461 (Pa. Super.), affirmed the Cumberland County Common Pleas Court decision that correspondence between plaintiff’s counsel and plaintiff’s treating physician, who was also...

 

HTMLElectronic Communications Sent from Workplace May Not be Confidential
Mark B. Hartig; McCumber, Daniels, Buntz, Hartig & Puig, P.A.;
Legal Alert/Article
February 24, 2011, previously published by The Benchmark on First Quarter 2011
In a time where most people are communicating via electronic mail and other social media outlets, the fine line between what is considered personal and confidential communication and what is not, is becoming more blurry. This is especially true when someone communicates from their workplace on...

 

Adobe PDFCase Study: The Value of Patents to a Supplier of Components
Alston Bird LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
January 5, 2011, previously published on January 4, 2011
Casting Co. is about to land a substantial contract with a major computer manufacturer (“Customer”) to supply a cast metal frame for a laptop housing by proposing an innovative laptop latch mechanism incorporated into the frame. The Customer favors this design over the products of the...

 


View Page: Prev  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next  >>